Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 33, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
Permanent residents are required to obtain permission to conduct business activities from their homes, existing use rights or development approvals for STA which continue with the land. Council continues to
ensuring considerations for neighbours and community standards are met. In contrast, STA operators, lobby the State government with regard to existing use rights and STA.
driven by commercial interests, frequently prioritise profitability over the tranquillity and cohesion of The Short Stay Letting or Home Hosted Accommodation local law cannot remove development rights or
residential areas. This disparity in behaviour and responsibility significantly impacts the quality of life for existing use rights- and is limited to the ongoing operation of the use and enforcement of the requirements
permanent residents. of the local law.
We have experienced firsthand the detrimental effects of an STA operating next door, which has
dramatically diminished our residential amenity. The decision to prioritise commercial interests over the
well-being of residents is deeply concerning and must be rectified. It is imperative that Council reassesses
the balance between "existing use rights" and the rights of residents to enjoy a peaceful living
environment. It is our belief that a legal test case is required to determine the priority of residential homes
in Noosa – tourist accommodation or permanent residences?
A speedy transition from approved whole-of-house STAs is required in all non-tourist zones to return
these areas to “residents first” zones. This can be done in several ways such as:
No new STA applications are approved in non-tourist zones.
Owners are given 5 years notice that all residential properties will be inconsistent with STA
accommodation by 1 July 2029.
Removal of rights If council rates are not paid on time
The property is returned to residential use upon the sale of the property – there are no ‘existing use’ rights.
‘3 Strikes you’re out” – Owners lose STA rights if they have 3 upheld complaints against their property.
23108708 Noosa Council should conduct further tourism and real estate industry specific consultation when While the State government has indicated it will look into the implementation of a short-term rental No change be made to proposed
considering changes to visitor accommodation and clearly communicate facts around existing use rights. registration system there would appear to be little appetite for a mandatory code of conduct or state-wide amendments as a result of the
regulatory system. submission
In the absence of a state-wide scheme, Noosa Council should mobilise its efforts for state-wide solutions
which are fair, sustainable, and enforced from the State Government level. The resourcing to monitor and
regulate STRA at a local level is an imposition on Council officers and staff. Moreover, different local level
regulations create an opaque patchwork which can be confusing for hosts, guests, and the industry.
Council could partner with Airbnb to lobby the State Government for a statewide registration scheme, and
a statewide code-of-conduct which will help provide a stronger and clearer framework for guests, hosts,
and the entire sector. Housing the regulation in a State Government department like New South Wales
and Tasmania currently do, will also free up resourcing for Noosa Council, at a time where Councils are
spread very thin in their remit and responsibilities.
23099361 These amendments will result in an increase in STA that would otherwise be unachievable. Places Submitters are concerned that the proposed prohibition of STA will generate an influx of applications No change be made to proposed
23101851 decision making in the hands of administrative staff. Requests leadership and major administrative under the superseded planning scheme assessed by officers rather than Council. It is not considered this amendments as a result of the
reform. These amendments do not reflect the community’s aims. Residents will have no access to STA is likely. submission
decision making: no role, no right to know of, or make submission on STA applications if these
amendments are endorsed. They will diminish the lived environment of Noosa and make it an undesirable
place to live and an undesirable location to visit. Will destroy Noosa’s distinct qualities.
Noosa Council has the capacity to effectively manage and control STA via the local law and effective
assessment and management of existing rights applications. We don’t need Plan changes to achieve
effective STA outcomes, we need effective leadership.
2.3. Concerns and objections to STA amendments
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
23055043 Wants freedom to rent house (in the LDR zone) for STA without controls from Council. Noosa Plan 2020 makes short term accommodation an inconsistent use I the Low Density Residential That no change be made to
Too many controls and fees to make it worthwhile doing just a few times a year. zone which is intended for permanent residents. This has been in place since the plan’s commencement proposed amendments as a
in 2020. result of this submission.
A permanent resident may undertake short term accommodation of their principal place of residence for
no more the 4 times and a maximum of 60 days per calendar year.
5758831 With regard to limiting Short-term accommodation to 4 times and maximum of 60 days per calendar year, STA in a permanent resident’s principal place of residence is limited to 4 times and a maximum of 60 That no change be made to
when undertaken by a resident in their principal place of residence: please consider some residents are days per calendar year. Reference to guests wanting to stay 1-2 months would fit within the 60 days proposed amendments as a
often away more than 60 days a year - please consider the income for those months away to the resident. limitation for STA. result of this submission.
It seems wasteful to leave a property empty while away, especially when there is a low rental vacancy If a permanent resident was to be on holidays longer than 60 days they may rent their principal place of
environment. residence for a minimum of 3 months, which is regarded permanent occupancy and not STA.
Consider the loss of property values if short term letting opportunities are limited, I don't think any
residents of the area want downward pressure there.
31
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.