Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 5, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
I understand you are considering altering the areas that are deemed 'Tourist Areas' and those that should
be 'Residential'. I can understand this but my Family and Owners of Noosa Pacific 2 have Purchased
property for the long term future and their commitment to the Tourist trade in Queensland. Some of my
Owners already pay increased Rates for 'Transitory Accommodation' which is an impost already.
I must inform you that the Region needs both Tourist Accommodation that is viable for Owners to Invest
in, areas gazetted for Residential only areas should not affect the viability of this very Vibrant Tourism
Industry.
I believe that Noosa Pacific 2, is clearly in the Tourist Area within walking distance to Hasting Street and
or Noosaville.
I wish you the best but am concerned Owners might look to Sell their Tourist Units if this Review was
Successful in changing the perception of areas that are clearly Tourist Accommodation.
5806555 I do agree with the dividing of areas into Tourism, Low density residential, high density residential. This Support noted. That no change be made to
is a good start to reducing short term rentals in residential areas. It is acknowledged that many operators of short-term accommodation do an excellent job of managing proposed amendments as a
My neighbour operates short term rental from their home and I can only say they do all the right things, their property and guest behaviour, with respect for their neighbours. result of this submission.
they are registered, they ensure that their house is not used as a party house. They vet their clients and
I have never had any noise or other problems from them.
1.2. Thomas Street / Gympie Terrace / Albert St
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
23109015 Summary of submission Support for the District Centre zone is noted, however commercial uses should not extend down Albert That a change be made to the
• 6.1. Although an application is currently lodged for a code assessable application for a mixed-use Street which is residential. The proposed High Density Residential zone is therefore the most appropriate proposed amendments to:
development including Short Term Accommodation - this submission supports the rezoning and zone for rear Lot 2 of 207 Gympie Terrace given its frontage to Albert Street and location adjoining and ▪ remove 207 Gympie Terrace
creation of the District Centre Zone (Mainstreet Precinct) for the entire site and proposes appropriate within a residential area . from active frontage
changes/amendments. An unintended consequence of the proposed District Centre zone and High Density Residential zone requirements
• 6.2. The submission also recommends considering the entire site as a whole and removing part of the inadvertently reduced the GFA for sites over 2000m2 in the District Centre zone and over rear Lot 2 of ▪ reinstate 0.8:1 plot ratio for site
site adjoining Albert St from the High-Density Residential zone. 207 Gympie Terrace . The current 0.8:1 GFA allowed over this site under the current provisions of Noosa area above 2000m2 in the
Plan 2020 will therefore be reinstated so there is no loss of yield. District Centre zone in the
• 6.3. The scale and scope of the proposed changes to the Noosa Plan clearly constitute a materially
Some clarification of provisions regarding the District Centre zone and the Mainstreet precinct will be Mainstreet Precinct in
adverse planning change (see Section 30 of The Planning Act 2016) and diminishes the value of the
undertaken to ensure the requirements are clear. Noosaville, consistent with
submitter’s property. This results in a material adverse planning change - the consequence of which is
The submitter also seeks the active street frontage be removed from the Framework and Character Plan. current allowance;
the potential for a claim for compensation.
▪ reinstate 0.8:1 plot ratio for 207
• 6.4. PO15 of the District Centre Zone Code should clearly state the Plot Ratio beyond 2,000m2 is 1.1:1. The key focus of the proposed Mainstreet and activation is Thomas Street and the corner extent to
Gympie Terrace. It is considered reasonable that the extent of the requirements for active frontages not Gympie Terrace Lot 2 in the
6.5. AO41.2 of the District Zone Code should be deleted from the proposed amendments
extend to 207 Gympie Terrace and be removed. This is consistent wit the proposed changes to the extent High Density Residential zone,
• 6.6. PO41 (a) of the District Zone Code should be changed from ‘ancillary to and support’ to of the Mainstreet Precinct and District Centre zone applying to 185 Gympie Terrace discussed below. consistent with current
‘complementary to’. allowance.
A District centre provides services for the local community and visitors to the Shire. It is important to use
• 6.7. The Tables of Assessment for the District Zone Code should only limit the size of individual the land efficiently while maintaining a Noosa style-built form and character. Each locality is unique, and ▪ amend PO41 of the District
premises for non-residential uses. the proposed Mainstreet Precinct requires specific provisions to ensure these outcomes. Centre zone code to change
• 6.8. The Purpose and Overall Outcomes of the District Centre Zone Code should be amended to reference to residential
Dwelling in the District Centre zone will provide accommodation for permanent residents and need not be dwellings being “ancillary to” to
provide for mixed use buildings with ground floor business uses and permanent residents in a range of ancillary to the business use. A change from “ancillary” to “complementary to” is therefore warranted. To
dwelling types and sizes. “complementary to” and the
reinforce that t a mixed use format building is residential in conjunction with a business activity, the AO is corresponding AO to reinforce
• 6.9. The corner of Gympie Terrace and Albert St should be removed from the Primary Active Street also proposed to be amended. that a mixed use building
Frontage Character Plan. In terms of setbacks, the site is affected by flooding and requires development to be constructed at a format is residential in
• 6.10. This submission requests Council change the proposed amendments to encourage development minimum floor level which is considerably higher than the existing footpath level. The required 6m setback conjunction with a business
that is economically viable for a property owner and that delivers, for residents of and visitors to Noosa, for the lower storeys is required to provide a vegetated setback and dela with the changes in level which activity.
a development that celebrates environmental excellence, quality lifestyle and economic wellbeing. also allows for some outdoor dining opportunities to activate the public realm. Changes to the setback ▪ tidy up of provisions for greater
requirements are not appropriate in response to the submission. clarification and make any
consequential changes to the
provisions and mapping as a
result of the changes.
23087007 My wife and I own a property in "Twin Quays" in Albert Street immediately abutting a section of the former Lots 1 and 2 on RP96277 are both classed as 207 Gympie Tce. Proposed amendments show Lot 2, the That no change be made to
Service Station site fronting Gympie Terrace. It has never been clear whether the entire site is owned by smaller lot adjoining Twin Quays as going to the High Density Residential Zone, whereas Lot 1 is proposed amendments as a
one party or several so there is concern regarding how logical, efficient access can be given to each proposed to go to the District Centre Zone. Both lots, plus 203 Gympie Terrace, are subject to a current result of this submission
component part. development application for 26 Short Term Accommodation Units and 4 Food & Drink outlet tenancies.
The small site proposed to be rezoned for 3 storey (12 metre) high unit development will presumably be The proposed development application over 203-207 Gympie Terrace suggest vehicle access from Albert
accessed off Albert Street for guests’ cars, Trade deliveries etc. and would have a basement parking St and a landscape buffer adjoining the northern edge of Twin Quays. This application is a separate
area. The larger site fronting Gympie Terrace would not (presumably) have access off Gympie Terrace, process to the planning scheme amendments.
but also from Albert Street which will add congestion and distract from a pleasant street elevation to what Under the 1985 planning scheme, up until 2006 203 and 207 Gympie Terrace and 6-14 Thomas Street
is a pleasant, landscaped residential street, not a commercial zone. were all included in the Commercial A zone, allowing for a mix of business uses to 12 metres in height.
Ground floor commercial frontages to Gympie Terrace are expected but we would not be prepared to The 1997 Strategic Plan included the area in the Visitor Accommodation and Services designation which
accept those uses wrapping around on to Albert Street. lead to it being zoned Visitor Mixed Use in the 2006 planning scheme and then Tourist Accommodation
3
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.