Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 69, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
6. Affordable Housing & Affordable Rental Premises
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
23108597 We are delighted to see that the Draft Amendments to the Noosa Plan have a strong focus on facilitating The proposed amendments seek to apply development incentives for ‘affordable rental premises’ and a That a change be made to the
pathways for the delivery of additional housing supply, housing choice, housing diversity and housing pathway forward through subsidised rents for those who meet the affordable housing criteria. proposed amendments in
affordability. This demonstrates Council’s commitment to tackling the housing crisis that is currently Housing Cost response to submissions to:
gripping the Shire and the nation more broadly. This submission outlines our observations of the proposed ▪ retain the current Noosa Plan
amendments and our view on their success in achieving the desired objectives: The median sale price for dwellings in Noosa Shire is almost twice that for the whole State. The gap
between Noosa Shire and the State has been widening over the last several years. Accordingly median 2020 small dwelling definition
Whilst the inclusion of a new administrative definition for social housing is supported in principle, we rents across Noosa Shire are also considerably higher than other areas, particularly in areas close to and small dwelling size of
recommend the second point be amended to reference an entity other than the state (e.g. a not-for-profit employment options. 100sqm of gross floor area.
organisation or local government) as registered community housing. ▪ retain the current Noosa Plan
Noosa Shire has a high proportion of housing that is owned outright, as high as 49% in Noosa Heads.
In addition to our concerns with the reduced size of small dwellings, we recommend consideration for This represents households for whom housing security and affordability may not be a concern. 2020 small dwelling bonus
reducing the minimum use period for Affordable rental premises from 30 years to 20 years. For our typical provisions as opt-in rather than
funding requirements (eg. if subsidy funded) the subsidy will expire after 20 years, so there may not be There are factors beyond the control of Noosa Council that influence housing affordability, for instance mandatory in the Medium and
the ability to operate as affordable rental premises for the last 10 years. tax regimes that favour property investments and desirability of short term letting holiday homes. High Density Residential zone;
We support the introduction of dual occupancy and multiple dwellings as a consistent use Influencing factors include the very high land values, given local amenity and the finite supply of ▪ make dual occupancies
Community Facilities Zone subject to code assessment if for affordable rental accommodation. This developable land. Construction costs have also risen exponentially in the last few years and borrowing consistent on lots less than
opens up a multitude of opportunities on what may otherwise be underutilised land throughout the Shire. costs have risen. It is appreciated that builders and property developers are operating businesses and 1000sqm in the Medium
need to make money to stay afloat. They are not expected to operate at a loss. Density Residential zone;
We support the introduction of PSP11 Provision of Affordable Rental Premises which offers clear
guidance to developers on the process for successfully delivering affordable housing in partnership with Many tourist destinations are feeling the impacts of tourism eroding residential amenity and short term ▪ make dual occupancies
a Registered Community Housing Provider. accommodation is in part contributing to the issue of demand for permanent housing stock and rising inconsistent of lots 1000sqm or
asset values and high rental costs. Competing demand between visitors and residents is addressed in greater in the Medium Density
23109495 The requirement to ensure affordable rental premises for 30 years places unreasonable burden on both more detail in sections 4, 5 and 6 of this submissions table. Residential zone;
Council and landowners to maintain a legally relevant mechanism which can enforce this requirement. Social Housing
Affordable rental premises should not extend beyond 10 years, in line with existing legislative framework. ▪ make the use of a dwelling
For the size of the population there is a reasonably good mix of social housing within Noosa Shire, and house consistent and accepted
23108640 The costs involved with realising the incentives or complying with requirements risks compromising the more is planned. However, a relatively small proportion of people qualify for social housing, and waiting development subject to
financial feasibility of undertaking development on the former Noosa Heads Bowls Club, preventing any lists are long. Affordable rental premises for low to medium income workers are desperately needed. requirements if located on a lot
additional housing from being realised at all. The aspirations for providing greater housing choice for the Household needs less than 500sqm, in the
community, including affordable housing and small dwellings, must be balanced with the commercial Medium and High Density
The 2021 census indicated that compared to the broader Sunshine Coast region, most parts of Noosa
realities of undertaking development in the current economic climate that is significantly constrained by Residential zones; and
Shire have higher proportion of lone person and two person households (small households). Across the
high construction costs and diminishing returns. ▪ make the use of a dwellings
Shire 66.9% of all households were small households.
Within the High Density Residential Zoned portion of the site, it is acknowledged that the amendment house inconsistent on a lot
Noosa Shire however has high proportions of large dwellings of 3 or more bedrooms, being 76.8% across
aims to provide incentives where development provides affordable rental premises. It is considered that 500sqm or greater in the
the whole Shire, noticeably higher in Tewantin and the hinterland.
providing 20% of the gross floor area as affordable rental premises is too high and would deter the Medium and High Density
incorporation of affordable housing into future development on the site. We request that this be reduced Key workers will be of various ages and stages of life, some have dependent children living at home and Residential zones.
to a 10% requirement for gross floor area to be affordable rental premises. This will allow for inclusion of some do not. It is not assumed they are all single. Households with more than one income may have
▪ remove the affordable rental
affordable housing to be a more commercially viable option. t is requested that the same incentives be more options however they are still limited.
bonus provisions from the
provided within the Major Centre Zone, in that the category of assessment be reduced to code Community Housing Providers Medium and High Density
assessment where 75% of units are small dwellings and 10% affordable rental premises are provided. The definition of Affordable Rental Premises relies on management by a Community Housing Provider. Residential zones except on
23109126 We considered the proposed definition of Affordable Rental Premises to be too restrictive particularly, the Private build-to-rent developments rely on a certain scale to be feasible. While a proportion of the the key sites being the former
requirement for the dwelling to be owned or leased by a registered Community Housing Provider (CHP); dwellings might be affordable, they need to be cross-subsidised by profitability of the balance as there is Noosa Bowls Club site and
and managed by a registered CHP, as long-term rental housing for a minimum of 30 years. no residual gap funding available to private property managers. The likelihood of a development within Noosa Business Centre; and
Whilst we acknowledge that housing provided by a CHP should be one of the options for delivering Noosa Shire being able to operate under such circumstances without the involvement of a CHP is low. ▪ Retain the proposed
affordable housing in Noosa, it should not be the only option. The ability for the private sector to deliver Feasibility amendment for additional
affordable housing without a community housing provider (i.e. private build-to-rent accommodation) bonuses for 20% affordable
The affordable rental premises (ARP) provisions advertised were based on the ability, in part, for the rental premises provisions in
should also be contemplated within the definition. We note that Noosa Council contemplates entering developer/owner to access capital funding and/or availability payment funding from the State or Federal
into both an Infrastructure Agreement, and use of a covenant on title (between Council and the landowner) the Major Centre Zone (Noosa
Governments via a community housing provider (CHP). These funding streams, while available in some Junction and the Village Mixed
to secure the use for its intended purpose for the agreed term – thereby negating the requirement for a form, are not suited for small scale development or for a mum and dad investor wanting to place their
CHP. Use Precinct of Noosa
investment unit with a CHP and receive market return with the CHP accessing gap funding (availability or Business Centre), District
The proposed additional storey at a maximum of 2.0 meters is considered to be too restrictive on built- recurrent funding sources). Recurrent funding is required for the ARP package to be feasible for a small Centre Zone Doonella Street
form. We consider that an additional storey at 3.0 metres (total building height of 15.0 metres) would be investor, needing a similar scheme to the National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS), which has now Precinct and the High Density
a more appropriate outcome – allowing for superior design and built-form outcomes, and better integration finished and has not been replaced. Residential zoned site at the
of commercial and retail spaces at the ground floor. The current recurrent funding sources rely on feasibility of a whole development’s life cycle and a complex Noosa Business Centre and
The Amendments for Housing Choice provide a strong foundation for facilitating the delivery of further funding application to State or Federal Governments and unlikely to be accessed by small developers as the High Density Residential
affordable dwellings in Noosa Junction, however the Amendments in their current form will not facilitate seen in Noosa Shire. Therefore, with no appropriate or suitable type of funding available, this places the Zoned portion of Lot 3
the sustainable and feasible delivery of new homes. feasibility of development providing ARP at risk, particularly in the MDR and most of the HDR sites across RP884396 at Noosa Junction.
the Shire.
23099355 Our understanding for renewal of a 500m2 Lot – with a combined 320m2 GFA of restaurant/ café/ retail
Lots on ground and 3 x 75m2 apartments on each of levels 1 & 2 above, we estimate over 20 car parks Considering the above it is recommended not to proceed with the ARP and associated bonus provisions
as being required, even with bundling/car pool considerations noted in the “draft” amendments. Cleary in the MDR zone and most of the HDR zone (some exceptions).
this is not achievable, desirable nor financial. In terms of the ARP in the Major Centre zones and selected HDR sites, when considering the ability of
Likewise for our holding on western side of Arcadia Walk (Lot 2 on RP109923 & Lot 2332 on RP95668) these zones to access an additional storey and 2m in building height and the associated plot ratio may
– which currently has 720m2 retail on 992m2 land. With several tenants likely to vacate soon including allow a scale of development needed for the ARP to proceed. Therefore, it is recommended to retain the
anchor Westpac, it would be perfect opportunity to re-position the Retail Lots (many of the current tenants ARP and associated provisions in the Major Centre (Noosa Junction), Noosa Business Centre Village
can’t survive with continuing losses with past 3 wet seasons & limited internal seating), and add affordable Mixed Use Precinct, District Centre Zone Doonella Street Precinct and the advertised HDR zoned sites
small dwellings above. For similar ground floor retail and say 10-12 small apartments above results in a which were subject to the additional 1 storey and 2m in building height.
planning need 40 plus car, on a site that currently has NIL parking. With seemingly little to No Council
67
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.