Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 75, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Your Say ECM Submitter comments Response Recommendation
Reference reference
private partnerships, incentives for developers, and streamlined approval processes for affordable
housing projects.
Re-evaluate the regulatory framework to remove barriers that stifle creativity and prevent the development
of innovative housing solutions. A more flexible and supportive planning scheme will encourage the
development of diverse and affordable housing options, helping to achieve the council's goals.
23113004 Beachfront and beachside streets in some of Australia's most expensive suburbs isn't usually the target
for "affordable". 75m2 in some areas with those zonings are ridiculous. (I have been working with our
town plan since 1990).
5826568 Why is Noosa council trying to place the onus of affordable housing/cheaper housing on the private
individuals? It’s a very socialist/Marxist policy whilst simultaneously lining the pockets of developers.
23055061 Cheap accommodation for workers is admirable but all workers have some travel time and distance to
contend with. Such top-storey workers accommodation would become a ghetto and very detrimental to
the Noosa brand.
23055043 Large specific areas for rental accommodation will create future slums.
5808529 The amendment does not contain any cost analysis demonstrating the viability of what has been
proposed, no inducements will overcome the land value being a barrier to building affordable property in
Noosaville.
23094937 Of total gross floor of affordable rental premises should be at least 60%. What is the point of allowing an
extra storey if you aren’t serious about increasing affordable permanent residences – 20% is a joke!
5829852 Small multiple dwellings are definitely not a solution for affordable housing so close to the beach, how do
you balance the land purchase cost and construction?
23145647 The council policy decision requiring at least 75% of small affordable housing of not more than 75 m2s
be provided as a part of new development in the urban medium and high density zones of Noosa will not
achieve the intended outcomes. The high cost of land and rising building costs are significant and will
defeat the policy to provide low cost affordable housing.
5829853 The proposed approach is pretty much “social engineering” by forcing those that want to live in high
density areas to live in small 2 bedroom units. These units will not be “affordable housing” for obvious
reasons just check similar sized unit price levels and will not allow families to live in these areas.
I am all for “proper” affordable housing which needs to be subsidised and built where land is a lot cheaper
than in the high density zones of Noosaville. The Council needs to be realistic when using this term -
affordable housing. It has to be affordable!
5825156 We totally object to the Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Noosa Plan 2020 . If it were to be adopted, It
will devalue our property at 7/2-4 William Street , Noosaville by 33% . Obviously, the Councillors have
not had time to do an economical study. This proposal is a total disregard to hundreds of local property
owners, small local businesses and Noosa Council Rate Payers.
5828354 I do not believe that it is possible to have ""affordable accommodation"" in Noosa because property values
are so high. The only way would be if State Government builds and owns the property. Putting 4 stories
on Gympie Terrace will not provide cheap accommodation for workers because it's prime location with
highly sort after views. This will make the value of the accommodation very expensive and it will not be
affordable to the average worker.
5821244 While I understand the necessity of creating additional housing for residents and key workers, I believe
this plan fails to achieve that goal. Key workers are unlikely to afford these high-density living areas in
prime locations like Gympie Terrace. This plan appears to prioritize developers over the community’s
needs.
5819720 Not everybody can expect to find housing within the Noosa area. If people cannot find a place or afford
it, they have to move into the outskirts like it is usual everywhere.
5824573 I would like council to comprehensively consider the need to regulate/oversee the allocation of new
affordable homes to ensure that target populations eg. Health and education professionals and other key
worker roles, which are critical for a growing community are prioritised in the short, mid and long term.
I would want council to oversee the developers interests to ensure that affordable housing options are
sustainable long term options and offer high quality housing options to lower income professionals who
work and provide critical support to our community.
The artist impressions of these new multi residential dwellings look great but I note these are artist
impressions only. As such I have concerns re the comment that gardens and water features should not
be costly so as to not create expensive body corporate fees. Whilst I agree with keeping body corporate
fees as low as possible, I believe it is essential that green spaces and nature areas are essential to ensure
that people living in these apartments have quality considered aesthetics both inside and out. Correct
73
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.