Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 94, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
5754786 I and other Weyba Esplanade residents are against any extensions of Noosa Farmers Market due to Not of relevance to proposed scheme amendments – referred to DA as relates to an application That no change be made to
increase in traffic congestion. If it goes ahead this Council will be creating yet another Hastings Street proposed amendments as a
nightmare. Will you learn? result of this submission
In high season we have cars bumper to bumper from Lesley drive roundabout up through Noosa Junction
attempting to access Hastings Street. To extend the market means to join onto this traffic jam. If the
management are seeking more stalls it may be helpful to remove such stalls that sell Rocklea produce
and is not authentic local farmers produce. The FM original conditions were to have a traffic controller
and this isn't occurring. Nor are their health inspections. Weyba Esplanade has already had river
embankment erosion and a request to Council for yellow lines to be placed in our street was ignored. The
neighbours have had enough with the squeeze we contend with every Sunday just to get out of our
driveways. There is no more parking spaces available and the road is deteriorating due to the extra traffic.
23063897 I look forward to no more land clearing in the Noosa Shire and some urban density over the transit hub The amendments provide for affordable housing and small dwellings within and around key centres in That no change be made to
and supermarkets in Noosa junction to enhance the place and provide housing opportunity for all types Noosa Shire. This housing will cater for a broad spectrum of the community including key workers, elderly proposed amendments as a
of residents. residents, families who don’t need larger detached dwellings, people wanting to downsize etc. result of this submission
Built form provisions will apply to these developments ensuring good design outcomes in keeping with
the Noosa Design Principles and sub-tropical design outcomes.
5819135 This information should have been included with our rates notices. This is too important not to have had Submitters concerns about the consultation process are noted. The owners of any properties being That no change be made to
wide spread information given to all local residences. We should not have to our properties rezoned “rezoned” were personally notified so it is considered this submission may relate to a change in consistent proposed amendments as a
without proper consultation. What is being proposed is too dense and not enough car spaces being uses and densities instead. Development still requires onsite car parking. result of this submission
provided. I know council wants us all to walk or ride a bike but for a lot of us this is not possible. I
personally cannot do my job without a car! Let Noosa remain a beautiful green space not an Aura dense
mess.
23145647 Many of the proposed amendments reflect the current land uses. I agree that the 2020 plan should be It is not proposed to increase the number of public carparks. On-site carparking remains a condition of That no change be made to
brought up to date to align with current approved development. development or redevelopment. proposed amendments as a
result of this submission
Allowing intensified development without the provision of adequate car parking is questionable as this will Occupancy rates and numbers of persons usually resident is obtained from Census data. Residents are
cause parking congestion and conflict on existing residential streets. Currently it is difficult to find car people who live here, not family and friends who visit from time to time. It is not sustainable to continue
parks in much of the Gympie Terrace high use area. Is the council proposing to fill the gap by providing to build big dwellings to accommodate anybody who may want to visit Noosa. It does not improve housing
significant additional public parking? choice or affordability for residents and workers.
The council's assumption that two thirds of households in the council area having three or more bedrooms
only accommodate one to two people is incorrect. Many residents have larger houses encouraging their
family and friends to come and visit regularly due to the attractiveness of Noosa. These additional rooms
provide an opportunity for family members to come together and reunite in an increasingly global world.
Many friends and visitors also enjoy Noosa in these larger homes when alternative accommodation is not
available or is unaffordable.
5819720 The whole Plan 2020 is a slap in the face for every land owner and not tolerable. Why doesn't the council Local Government planning schemes regulate what new development can occur on any site. Every piece That no change be made to
just seize the blocks of land? That's what it basically is. We doubt that this invasive scheme is of land is included in a zone and the zoning affects what you can do with it. As an example the medium proposed amendments as a
constitutional at all. The short term rental fees were declared unlawful as well because only the federal density residential zone covers land that is mainly used for multiple dwellings such as apartments and result of this submission
government can introduce taxes. townhouses. Many uses are already inconsistent in the medium density residential zone. These
It is not the councils decision what people buy on their block of land. The Noosa council doesn't have the amendments propose to add the use of dwelling house to that list in an attempt to encourage housing
power for that and can only approve distances to the fence line, limiting building heights or similar things. choice. Existing houses can remain and Council can support replacement of an old house with a new
one.
23055148 Even with government subsidies, how can housing in areas like Noosa Junction ever really be classed as Building heights across the Shire will majority remain unchanged as part of the proposed amendments.
affordable? The only location where this could occur are in the Major Centre Zone and old bowls club site at Noosa
Agrees with the inclusion of “Encouraging transition to a Smart Biosphere that is future focused, evidence Junction, Noosa Business Centre and the High Density Residential Zone adjoining the centre and in
based and focuses on people and place. An economy less reliant on tourism and population driven Tewantin District Centre Zone within the Donella Street precinct. Building heights can only be increased
industries”, in the Amendment. by an additional 2m in height and are subject to the development including 25% of affordable rental
premises.
Transport does not seem to have any amendments yet is an area that requires huge change, innovative
thinking and careful consideration. Many housing and infrastructure issues could be solved, with little The additional 2m in building height within these specific defined areas is not considered to alter the
impact to the environment, with the implementation of a modern transport system in Noosa. Spending generally low rise village character of Noosa and not every site will realistically take up the option to
tax payers funds on upgrading our bus system rather than subsidising and incentivising developers, would provide affordable rental housing with the additional 2m. If they don’t the current building heights will still
ensure workers/students would not need to be housed in business precincts, rather they could make use be applied.
of affordable housing in residential areas- where residents are supposed to live. An integrated traffic and land use study is currently underway to identify the implications of the proposed
amendments and upgrades required to the road and intersection network. Providing more housing in
Noosa Junction will increased the activation of the centre and will have positive impacts on the local
economy and will help support local businesses in Noosa Junction. Noosa Junction is well located to
public transport and services and more affordable housing options will allow key workers to live near or
close to work therefore reducing impacts on the local traffic network.
The removal of the word predominantly provides a stronger policy intent for the residential zones. That is,
these zones are for residential purposes exclusively and therefore makes no allowance or consideration
for other non-residential uses in the zone. This coupled with the proposed amendments seek to make any
new short-term accommodation an inconsistent use in the medium and high density residential zones,
bring these zones in line with the Low density residential zone.
The proposed definition of affordable rental premise means one or more dwellings which are:
92
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.