Original source · versioned page text
NOOSA PLAN 2020 PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 - POST PUBLIC NOTIFICATION FOR FINAL STATE GOVERNMENT MINISTERIAL APPROVAL · Attachment 1 Table of submissions
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Original PDF page 96, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
5821408 This plan is too big a chance especially around density. Submission is noted. That no change be made to
proposed amendments as a
result of this submission.
23144997 Noosa Has always been Special – that is why we have all chosen to live here! We didn’t chose to live on Submission is noted. That no change be made to
the GOLD COAST with its develop at all costs attitude. We chose to live in a low rise environment with proposed amendments as a
an affinity with our wild life and a desire to retain our parks and landscape. We all understand the issues result of this submission.
at play in the world of supply and demand in the real estate landscape, Noosa Has ALWAYS been an
area that lacks room to expand, we are penned in by the river and sea and the Hinterland that provides
the water for our residents . I am NOT happy with the views of our council and their planning.
5746936 Long-term resident concerned amendments not based on evidence or studies showing how outcomes The proposed amendments are consistent with the recommendations of both the Housing Strategy and That no change be made to
will be achieved or are even the most appropriate or wanted outcomes. Short-Term Accommodation Monitoring report. The Housing Strategy was founded on a comprehensive proposed amendments as a
What costs are amendments going to impose on existing residents, in terms of rates, fees, and impact to Housing Needs Assessment in 2022 and the STA Monitoring Report was a comprehensive assessment result of this submission.
property values? of Council’s planning policy around visitor accommodation, including STA, both prior to the introduction
of Noosa Plan 2020 (under the provisions of The Noosa Plan 2006) and following Noosa Plan’s
Where is honest analysis of the impacts that other newly-imposed short-term-rental costs and regulations implementation. These reports looked at the implications STA and growth in online booking platforms has
have had? had on housing supply and affordability as well as residential amenity.
No amendments should be made without a legitimate and statistically accurate understanding of whether Rates are based on land use – so if a property is undertaking STA now, they should be paying the
or not those amendments are genuinely wanted by the residents of Noosa. Transitory Accommodation rate. This will not change with the proposed amendments. Likewise, all STA
properties (unless exempt by the local law) require a local law approval and annual renewal. This does
not change with the proposed amendments.
Property values are not a planning matter – however there is no loss to development yield under the
proposed amendments, with building heights and gross floor area allowances remaining the same, and
in some cases bonus provisions are allowed where affordable housing is provided.
The introduction of the local law has had a positive outcome for residential amenity and dealing with
complaints, the associated annual renewal fees for regulating STA under the local law are minimal.
Detached houses pay $1.10 per day and units pay $0.55 per day under their annual renewal fees.
The public consultation process of the proposed amendments provides residents the opportunity to have
their say, and all submissions are considered.
In summary, the proposed amendments are founded on comprehensive background studies and
strategies and the costs to STA operators does not change. The submission is not considered to warrant
any changes to the proposed amendments as publicly notified.
23080125 Submitters have various suggestions for pathways, connectivity, changes in land uses etc. Most of which Suggestions noted in the submission and will be considered. That no change be made to
are not related to the proposed planning scheme amendments. In terms of the low cost accommodation see a detailed response in Section 5 and 6 of this Table. proposed amendments as a
Suggests an investment program to encourage cooperative transformation within Noosa Junction starting result of this submission.
with the Cinema, Bowls Club Site, Noosa Fair, and Noosa Junction Plaza.
The grandfather rights are the legal interpretation of State Government planning legislation and currently
Convert low-cost holiday accommodation within the broader Noosa region into worker accommodation cannot be varied.
and develop new high-end visitor accommodation. The regional strategy for tourism requires affluent
tourists who provide the highest level of economic contribution per visitor. Existing low-cost holiday
accommodation is more suited to being affordable for worker accommodation than new-build
accommodation in major centres.
Worker accommodation is needed immediately and needs to be sustainability low cost. The success of
Airbnb in the region reflects an appetite from visitors to the region for accommodation more suitable to
families and groups. A loss of worker accommodation in the area negatively impacts multiple stakeholder
groups. These realities should not be ignored.
The solution to these problems is not to simply build low-cost accommodation in highly desirable areas.
New-build accommodation should always be of a higher quality than existing dwellings and
accommodation in highly-desirable locations will always be more expensive than other accommodation.
Recognise the natural features of different areas and work with them. This includes the attractiveness of
the Noosa Hill and Noosa Junction as a group-oriented tourist accommodation option within Noosa
Heads, particularly given the opportunity for the later to be redeveloped with this intent.
Incentivise use of accommodation in a way that is consistent with the collective needs of the community
through the dynamic adjustment of Council taxes. This may mean that accommodation likely to attract
high-value tourists and has a history of good management is allowed to operate as an STA with little
Council tax overhead, while properties which do not meet this standard are discouraged from operating
as an STA via increasing taxes.
Convert existing accommodation to its best long-term purpose. This will see existing accommodation
which does not attract high-value tourists instead converted into worker accommodation.
Equalise rights associated with STA by phasing out ‘grandfathered’ STA rights. All rights and incentives
(ie Taxes) should be established based on zoning, event history, and suitability to support collective goals.
23094931 Fully support proposed zone changes from Tourist Accommodation to High Density Residential for Support noted That no change be made to
permanent accommodation to allow for smaller dwellings. proposed amendments as a
Fully support rezoning of Parkridge from Tourist to High Density accommodation to reflect the current result of this submission.
use. Having this address zoned tourist accommodation has caused heartache for residents and should
be a residential area, as the properties were originally sold as.
94
Table of Submissions made regarding Noosa Plan 2020 Proposed Amendment No. 2, 2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.