Council archive · source document
MCU21 0015 - Response to Information Request letter · MCU21/0015
MARC JOYCE – TOWN PLANNING AND HERITAGE CONSULTANT
62 Karelyn Dr Joyner 4500
E: [email protected] P: 07 3882 2159 M: 0401 865 385 ABN 55 206 783 816
11 March 2021
Noosa Shire Council
Attn Blake Coulston
Re: Information Response, MCU21 0015
21 Nannygai St Noosaville
Dear Blake,
Thanks for the information request dated 5 March 2021. In response to the items listed we
offer the following information and attached are revised plans.
1. Driveway cross overs. Linking the driveways together was considered but proved to
be too detrimental to the proposed design. Particularly it badly affected the sense of
security and privacy of the front yard spaces for the proposed units. Instead of
providing a single 6 m wide driveway, what we did was narrow the driveways to just
3 m wide each and separate them by the width of one car parking space to ensure
that on street parking was not unduly affected by the proposal.
2. Roof Pitch. The roof pitches have been increased to 5 degrees and the use of
parapets has been removed.
3. Ground Levels. The site is located surrounded by allotments that have been filled.
The proposal fills the lands to match the levels of surrounding developments.
Ground lines showing the ground levels (derived from survey) have been included on
the revised plans. A height line showing the 8 m height above that natural ground
level has also been included to demonstrate the proposal complies with required
heights.
4. Landscape. Landscape details have been included in the revised plans.
5. Plant Species. Landscape details have been included in the revised plans.
6. Fill. The plans have been revised to include details showing the extent of fill and
retaining structures where required.
7. Stormwater. The site drains to the street. The site does not cause any ponding of
overland flows as surrounding lands are also filled to drain to the street.
8. Front Fence Setback. The front fence has been recessed back 1 m in accordance with
council policy. The front gates remain at the boundary to ensure adequate room for
another vehicle to park within the driveway of each unit.
Document Set ID: 21419095
Version: 1, Version Date: 16/03/2021
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
9. Front Fence Materials. The proposed fencing is shown on the revised plans being a
maximum of 1.2 m high. The gates are powder coated metal. The fences are
rendered brick. The average transparency of the gates and fences, when considered
together, is 50% transparent. The solid parts of the fence are also ameliorated by
landscaping.
10. Front boundary landscaping. The revised plans shown landscaping details around the
front fence.
I trust this information satisfies your concerns and look forward to the early approval of the
proposal.
kindest regards
Marc Joyce
Marc Joyce
Town Planning and Heritage Consultant
(DipURP, BA, DipMiss, CLD3)
Document Set ID: 21419095
Version: 1, Version Date: 16/03/2021
Used in these records
MCU21 0015 - Response to Information Request letter.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 150 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.