Original source · versioned page text
9.0 Assessment Tables
Built form Table 6.5.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Y/N/NA
All activities
Built form
Height N – The development proposes areas of the building which
PO9 AO9.1 exceed 10m in overall height. Specifically, 10.59m and 11.03m
Buildings and other structures— Buildings and structures are no more than 10 metres in building (best viewed on the Elevations as part of the Proposal Plan
height. package. The height has been exceeded in this instance as the
(a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and architectural scale site has been retained to create a relatively flat and graded
consistent with structures on adjoining and nearby land; Factory Street Business and Industry Precinct surface for the development. As a result the eastern portion of
(b) have a maximum building height of 2 storeys; AO9.2 the site exhibits a retaining wall which at its highest is 3m from
Buildings and structures are no more than 8 metres in building natural ground. The building is then situated on top of this
(c) do not visually dominate the street or surrounding spaces;
height. retaining wall and given the contours and undulation of the land
(d) preserve the amenity of surrounding residential beyond the retaining wall results in the building exceeding 10m
development including privacy, views and access to in height.
AO9.3
sunlight; and
Where excavation is required, the maximum portion of the We consider this proposal meets PO9 as follows:
(e) respond to the topography of the site; and exposed external façade of the building cannot exceed the
(f) are well articulated with strong horizontal and vertical respective building heights in AO9.1 and AO9.2 a) The development measured from the slab is no higher
than 7.75m We expect that development of the
elements to provide interest to the street.
Editor's note—refer to figure AP3-13A adjoining lot (4) in future will incur similar issues with
respect to building height if built towards the eastern
boundary. However we would also expect the finished
slab levels of both development sites to be fairly
consistent and as such the buildings heights in
comparison would be similar;
b) The development is not more than 2 storeys;
c) The height exceedance does not occur for the entire
length pf the eastern boundary and only a corner of
the building where viewed from the northern boundary;
d) The development does not adjoin residential
development and is afforded some natural visual
screening from existing and proposed landscape
which is approved by way of another development
application;
e) The development has responded as best as possible
to the topography of the site with regards to the
positioning and site plan of the buildings. The
development has achieved an appropriate grade for
the site and avoids unnecessary steps and ramps
within the development; and
f) The development is built to a continuous line along the
elevation however proposes low and high level glass
windows whilst also not having a continuous building
line across the whole of the eastern elevation provides
for a view through the development site.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (9.0 Assessment Tables.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.