Original source · versioned page text
9.0 Assessment Tables
Building design and Streetscape Table 6.5.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Y/N/NA
Kin Kin Business and Industry Precinct NA
PO13
No acceptable outcome provided
Buildings and other roofed structures for non-industrial uses have
a plot ratio not exceeding 1:1.
Setbacks Y – The development takes access from a reciprocal access
PO14 AO14 easement and thus is set back considerable from the road
Buildings and roofed structures are set back at least— which is Taylor Court. Outside of this the development is
Buildings and other structures are appropriately designed and
setback from the north by a 11m wide landscape buffer, to the
sited to— east by 3.05m by a landscaped swale and is only built to a 0m
Road frontage—
(a) provide amenity for users of the premises as well as boundary to the common side boundary of Lot 1 and 2.
(a) 6 metres to the primary road frontage;
preserve the visual and acoustic amenity of adjoining and
nearby properties (b) 4.5 metres to the secondary road frontage (where the
premises has frontage to more than one road); and
(b) maintain access to views and sunlight;
(c) 10 metres to boundaries that adjoin Walter Hay Drive,
(c) provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses; Eumundi Noosa Road, Eenie Creek Road and Holts Road
(d) allow space for required vehicle parking;
Other boundaries—
(e) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer the
proposed building; (a) 0.0 metres to boundaries that adjoin land in an industry
zone;
(f) allow for landscaping between buildings and within
frontages to soften buildings, car parking, infrastructure and (b) 10 metres to boundaries adjoining a residential zone;
services; (c) 10 metres to boundaries that adjoin Walter Hay Drive,
(g) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and Eumundi Noosa Road and/or Eenie Creek Road; and
landscape elements within the street; (d) 3 metres to any other boundary.
(h) avoid large areas of continuous wall planes by varying the
building setbacks and using appropriate techniques to
provide visual relief;
(i) not visually dominate the street or surrounding spaces
(j) avoid development within the Holts Road setback
All activities
Building design and Streetscape
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original (9.0 Assessment Tables.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.