Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

9.0 Assessment Tables

of 25
Building design and Streetscape                     Table 6.5.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)



 Performance outcomes                                                    Acceptable Outcomes                                               Y/N/NA

 Kin Kin Business and Industry Precinct                                                                                                    NA
 PO13
                                                                         No acceptable outcome provided
 Buildings and other roofed structures for non-industrial uses have
 a plot ratio not exceeding 1:1.
 Setbacks                                                                                                                                  Y – The development takes access from a reciprocal access
 PO14                                                                    AO14                                                              easement and thus is set back considerable from the road
                                                                         Buildings and roofed structures are set back at least—            which is Taylor Court. Outside of this the development is
 Buildings and other structures are appropriately designed and
                                                                                                                                           setback from the north by a 11m wide landscape buffer, to the
 sited to—                                                                                                                                 east by 3.05m by a landscaped swale and is only built to a 0m
                                                                         Road frontage—
  (a)   provide amenity for users of the premises as well as                                                                               boundary to the common side boundary of Lot 1 and 2.
                                                                         (a)    6 metres to the primary road frontage;
        preserve the visual and acoustic amenity of adjoining and
        nearby properties                                                (b)    4.5 metres to the secondary road frontage (where the
                                                                                premises has frontage to more than one road); and
  (b)   maintain access to views and sunlight;
                                                                         (c)    10 metres to boundaries that adjoin Walter Hay Drive,
  (c)   provide adequate distance from adjoining land uses;                     Eumundi Noosa Road, Eenie Creek Road and Holts Road
  (d)   allow space for required vehicle parking;
                                                                         Other boundaries—
  (e)   preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer the
        proposed building;                                               (a)    0.0 metres to boundaries that adjoin land in an industry
                                                                                zone;
  (f)   allow for landscaping between buildings and within
        frontages to soften buildings, car parking, infrastructure and   (b)   10 metres to boundaries adjoining a residential zone;
        services;                                                        (c)   10 metres to boundaries that adjoin Walter Hay Drive,
  (g)   maintain the visual continuity and pattern of buildings and             Eumundi Noosa Road and/or Eenie Creek Road; and
        landscape elements within the street;                            (d)    3 metres to any other boundary.
  (h)   avoid large areas of continuous wall planes by varying the
        building setbacks and using appropriate techniques to
        provide visual relief;
  (i)   not visually dominate the street or surrounding spaces
  (j)   avoid development within the Holts Road setback

 All activities

 Building design and Streetscape

Log in to download the original (9.0 Assessment Tables.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.