Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

SubmissionRS_1 · MCU18/0015

Attached to the e-mail MCU180015 - Submission - Rebecca Stead.msg.

of 1

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

a NOOSA COUNCIL Notice of Submission

1. Application details
File No.: MCU18/0015 on Lot 27 RP89506
Postal address of Land (as advertised): 27Attunga Heights, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567

Nature of Proposed Development: Material change of Use and Reconfiguring of a Lot (1 into 3)

2. Submitter details
Full name of Submitter: Rebecca Stead

Email address (preferable): [email protected]

Address (residential or business): 1/29 Edgar Bennett Ave

 

 

 

 

Suburb: Noosa Heads State: QLD Postcode: 4567
Z J

Signature(s) ee

This form must igfed by each person who made the submission to be accepted by council

3. Details of Submission - State what aspects of the plan or proposed development you support or

oppose and why. If necessary, use separate sheet and attach
| (we) make the following submission opposing the Proposed Development:
Full submission of opposition is attached.

| oppose the Material change of Use, see full opposition attachment

 

 

 

1. 13 Dwelling locations are located on slope-sensitive locations and habitat

2. Original zoning was established in keeping with the wildlife conservation and
zoning legacy of the Attunga Heights street and area.

3. Biodiversity overlay code is disregarded No acknowledgement or analysis is
made of the Biodiversity overlay code covering the site or essential habitat
protection or rehabilitation for skink or koalas with exception of Bushfire report

4. ‘Of concern’ regional ecosystems are disregarded No acknowledgement or
analysis is made of the site’s “Environment Enhance or Protect status or ‘Of
concern regional ecosystems’ for vegetation rehabilitation’ see Bushfire report pg 14

5. Vegetation removal is understated with 61% of the total site vegetation
affected by the proposal for buildings, infrastructure and fire setbacks

6. Water usage and consumption for the 12 new units is not addressed. This ts an
additional burden arising from this site for resident usage (by at least 39.6 residents)
and landscape watering (rooftop, fern gardens). No provision for rainwater tanks
for the 12 units is addressed, only for the 2 dwellings. This does not seem to be in
keeping with best practice and drought awareness.

 

 

 

1 Refer Bushfire report pg 14Figure 9 shows the proposed development location in relation to vegetation
mapped by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy as “Of Concern” and “Of

Used in these records

About this file

File size
1.2 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

SubmissionRS_1.pdf · 1.2 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.