2020-05-21 Ordinary Meeting Minutes

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                           21 MAY 2020


               3.2. Frontage works conditioned is not consistent with current Council Standard
                    Drawing requirements under the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
               3.3. Erosion and sediment control measures conditioned are not consistent with
                    current requirements of the Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
               3.4. The access driveway is not consistent with current Council Standard Drawing
                    requirements under the Driveways and Carparking Code; and
               3.5. Earthworks conditioned is not consistent with current Council Standard
                    Drawing requirements under the Earthworks Code.
         4.    The development approval was designed in conjunction with 7 Park Crescent,
               Sunshine Beach, which has now lapsed and accordingly has the potential to
               adversely impact on the future amenity of 7 Park Crescent, Sunshine Beach.
         5.    The contributions payable towards trunk infrastructure under this approval are not
               consistent with the current Infrastructure Charges Resolution.
         6.    The proposed development is contrary to the outcomes sought for the site under
               the draft Noosa Plan, with duplex dwellings identified as inconsistent for the area
               in order to accommodate the projected housing needs for Shire.
    B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.




7   RAL19/0008 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT INTO
    2 LOTS) AT 216 BLACK MOUNTAIN ROAD, BLACK MOUNTAIN
    That Council note the report by the Development Planner to the General Committee Meeting
    dated 18 May 2020 regarding Application No. RAL19/0008 for a Development Permit for
    Reconfiguring A Lot (1 Lot into 2 Lots), situated at 216 Black Mountain Road, Black Mountain
    and:
    A.   Refuse the application for the following reasons:
         1.    The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 14.181.2a), c) and g) and
               Specific Outcomes O1 & O5 of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code, as proposed lot 2
               does not meet the minimum lot size required, is not suitable for its intended use,
               with the proposed house site and access located on steeply sloping land.
         2.    The proposal does not comply with Specific Outcomes O15 and O77 of the Cooroy
               & Lake Macdonald Locality Code, as the proposal is not responsive to the natural
               topography, and proposes significant earthworks to create a house site.
         3.    The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcome 13.30.2a) and b) and Specific
               Outcomes O1and O2 of the Natural Hazards Overlay Code, as proposed lot 2 is
               located in a landslide hazard area and significant earthworks are proposed to
               create the house site potentially placing people and property at risk from future
               landslides. .
    B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.




                                                                                 Page 11 of 13