Original source · versioned page text
Appendix O - SDAP Code Responses (002)
REPORT
Appendix O
SDAP Code Responses
PR139784 | Town Planning Report | v4 | 5 June 2019
rpsgroup.com
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 21 pages
Page 2
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road
environment
Table 1.2.1: Development in a state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings and structures
PO1 The location of buildings, structures, AO1.1 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, Complies with PO1
infrastructure, services and utilities does not services and utilities are not located in a state- The buildings on-site are setback at a significant
create a safety hazard in a state-controlled road, controlled road. distances from the state-controlled roads, and do
or cause damage to, or obstruct road transport AND not create a safety hazard for the roads from the
infrastructure AO1.2 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, proposed access as proven by the Site Access
services and utilities can be maintained without Advice letter included as Appendix F.
requiring access to a state-controlled road.
PO2 The design and construction of Buildings AO2.1 Facades of buildings and structures AO2.1 Complies
and structures does not create a safety hazard facing a state-controlled road are made of non- Facades of structures are made from non-
by distracting users of a state-controlled road. reflective materials. reflective materials.
OR
AO2.2 Facades of buildings and structures do
not reflect point light sources into the face of
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road.
AND
AO2.3 External lighting of buildings and
structures is not directed into the face of
oncoming traffic on a state-controlled road and
does not involve flashing or laser lights.
AND
AO2.4 Advertising devices visible from a state-
controlled road are located and designed in
accordance with the Roadside advertising guide,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 21
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO3 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges over AO3.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges Not Applicable
a state-controlled road are designed and over a state-controlled road include throw No bridges over state-controlled roads are
constructed to prevent projectiles from being protection screens in accordance with section proposed.
thrown onto a state-controlled road. 4.9.3 of the Design criteria for bridges and other
structures manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2014.
Filling, excavation and retaining structures
PO4 Filling and excavation does not interfere No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO4 Complies
with, or result in damage to, infrastructure or Filling will not interfere with any component of a state-
services in a state-controlled road. controlled road except where new access is created.
Note: Information on the location of services and
public utility plants in a state-controlled road can be
obtained from the Dial Before You Dig service.
Where development will impact on an existing or
future service or public utility plant in a state-
controlled road such that the service or public utility
plant will need to be relocated, the alternative
alignment must comply with the standards and design
specifications of the relevant service or public utility
provider, and any costs of relocation are to be borne
by the developer.
PO5 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO5 Complies
retaining structures do not undermine, or cause See response to PO4.
subsidence of, a state-controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ
certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in
accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And
Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 21
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response PO6 Filling, excavation, building foundations and No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO6 Complies retaining structures do not cause ground water See response to PO4. disturbance in a state-controlled road. Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the Road planning and design manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided. PO7 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting or fill No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO7 Complies compaction during construction of a Proposed works will not cause damage to the state- development does not result in ground controlled road. movement or vibration impacts that would cause damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road, road transport infrastructure or road works. Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the Road Planning And Design Manual 2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided. PO8 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO8.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material PO8 Complies extracted material or excavated spoil material is not transported to or from the development site The quantity of transported material will be managed exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not on a state-controlled road. to ensure no damage is caused to state-controlled damage the pavement of a state-controlled road. roads. Note: It is recommended a pavement impact assessment is provided in accordance with the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2017. PO9 Filling and excavation associated with the No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO9 Complies construction of vehicular access to a See response to PO4. State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0 State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 21
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
development does not compromise the operation
or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure for
a state-controlled road.
PO10 Fill material used on a development site AO10.1 Fill material is free of contaminants PO10 Complies
does not result in contamination of a state- including acid sulfate content. See response to PO4.
controlled road.
Note: Soils and rocks should be tested in accordance
with AS 1289.0 – Methods of testing soils for
engineering purposes and AS 4133.0-2005 –
Methods of testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO10.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in
accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
PO11 Filling and excavation does not cause AO11.1 Compaction of fill is carried out in PO11 Complies
wind-blown dust nuisance in a state-controlled accordance with the requirements of AS 1289.0 Dust nuisance will be appropriately managed through
road. 2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering a construction-management plan.
purposes.
AND
AO11.2 Dust suppression measures are used
during filling and excavation activities such as
wind breaks or barriers and dampening of
ground surfaces.
Stormwater and drainage
PO12 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO12 Complies
actionable nuisance, or worsening of, See Appendix G – Stormwater Management Report.
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a
state-controlled road.
PO13 Run-off from the development site is not AO13.1 Development does not create any new PO13 Complies
unlawfully discharged to a state-controlled road. points of discharge to a state-controlled road. See Appendix G – Stormwater Management Report
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 21
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO13.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO13.3 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the state-controlled road.
PO14 Run-off from the development site during AO14.1 Run-off from the development site PO14 Complies
construction does not cause siltation of during construction is not discharged to See Appendix G – Stormwater Management Report
stormwater infrastructure affecting a state- stormwater infrastructure for a state-controlled
controlled road. road.
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road
PO15 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO15.1 Development does not require new or PO15 Complies
that is a limited access road is consistent with changed access to a limited access road. See Appendix F – Site Access Advice
government policy for the management of limited
access roads. Note: Limited access roads are declared by the
transport chief executive under section 54 of the
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 and are identified in
the DA mapping system.
OR
AO15.2 A new or changed access to a limited
access road is consistent with the limited access
policy for the state-controlled road.
Note: Limited access policies for limited access roads
declared under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994
can be obtained by contacting the relevant
Department of Transport and Main Roads regional
office.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 21
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO15.3 Where a new or changed access is for a
service centre, access is consistent with the
Service centre policy, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013 and the Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities on limited
access roads, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013, and the Service centre strategy for
the state-controlled road.
Note: The Service centre policy, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013, Access policy for
roadside service centre facilities, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013 and the relevant
Service centre strategy for a state-controlled road can
be accessed by contacting the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
PO16 The location and design of vehicular AO16.1 Vehicular access is provided from a PO16 Complies
access to a state-controlled road (including local government road. See Appendix F – Site Access Advice
access to a limited access road) does not create OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
a safety hazard for users of a state-controlled apply:
road or result in a worsening of operating
conditions on a state-controlled road. AO16.2 Vehicular access for the development is
consistent with the function and design of the
Note: Where a new or changed access between the state-controlled road.
premises and a state-controlled road is proposed, the AND
Department of Transport and Main Roads will need to AO16.3 Development does not require new or
assess the proposal to determine if the vehicular
changed access between the premises and the
access for the development is safe. An assessment
can be made by Department of Transport and Main state-controlled road.
Roads as part of the development assessment
process and a decision under section 62 of Transport Note: A decision under section 62 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where sufficient Infrastructure Act 1994 outlines the approved
information is provided. conditions for use of an existing vehicular access to a
state-controlled road. Current section 62 decisions
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 21
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
can be obtained from the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
AND
AO16.4 Use of any existing vehicular access to
the development is consistent with a decision
under section 62 of the Transport Infrastructure
Act 1994.
Note: The development which is the subject of the
application must be of an equivalent use and intensity
for which the section 62 approval was issued and the
section 62 approval must have been granted no more
than 5 years prior to the lodgement of the application.
AND
AO16.5 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so
vehicles do not queue in a road intersection or
on the state-controlled road.
PO17 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road AO17.1 Vehicular access and associated road PO17 Complies
or local government road (and associated road access works are not located within 5 metres of See Appendix F – Site Access Advice
access works) are located and designed to not existing public passenger transport
damage or interfere with public passenger infrastructure.
transport infrastructure, public passenger AND
services or pedestrian or cycle access to public AO17.2 The location and design of vehicular
passenger transport infrastructure and public access for a development does not necessitate
passenger services. the relocation of existing public passenger
transport infrastructure.
AND
AO17.3 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so
vehicles using a vehicular access do not obstruct
public passenger transport infrastructure and
public passenger services or obstruct pedestrian
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 21
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
or cycle access to public passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger services.
AND
AO17.4 The normal operation of public
passenger transport infrastructure or public
passenger services is not interrupted during
construction of the development.
Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road
PO18 The location and design of vehicular AO18.1 Vehicular access is located as far as PO18 Complies
access to a local road within 100 metres of an possible from the state-controlled road See Appendix F – Site Access Advice
intersection with a state-controlled road does not intersection.
create a safety hazard for users of a state- AND
controlled road. AO18.2 Vehicular access is in accordance with
volume 3, parts, 3, 4 and 4A of the Road
Planning And Design Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
AND
AO18.3 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to
give priority to entering vehicles at all times so
vehicles do not queue in the intersection or on
the state-controlled road.
Planned upgrades
PO19 Development does not impede delivery of AO19.1 Development is not located on land AO19.1 Complies
planned upgrades of state-controlled roads. identified by the Department of Transport and Development is not located on land identified as
Main Roads as land required for the planned land required for the upgrade of a state-
upgrade of a state-controlled road. controlled road.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of a
state-controlled road is identified in the DA mapping
system.
OR
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 21
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO19.2 Development is sited and designed so
that permanent buildings, structures,
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
on land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO19.3 Structures and infrastructure located on
land identified by the Department of Transport
and Main Roads as land required for the planned
upgrade of a state-controlled road are able to be
readily relocated or removed without materially
affecting the viability or functionality of the
development.
AND
AO19.4 Vehicular access for the development is
consistent with the function and design of the
planned upgrade of the state-controlled road.
AND
AO19.5 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, land
required for a planned upgrade to a state-
controlled road.
AND
AO19.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre-
development condition at the completion of the
use.
Network impacts
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 21
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO20 Development does not result in a No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO20 Complies
worsening of operating conditions on the state- The development will not result in a worsening of
controlled road network. operating conditions on the state-controlled
network.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified traffic impact assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017.
PO21 Development does not impose traffic AO21.1 The layout and design of the Not Applicable
loadings on a state-controlled road which could development directs traffic generated by the The site is in a rural area and adjoins two state-
be accommodated on the local road network. development to the local road network. controlled roads and is therefore dependent on
using them for connectivity.
PO22 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a AO22.1 Upgrade works required as a result of AO22.1 Complies
state-controlled road are built in accordance with the development are designed and constructed Proposal will comply.
Queensland road design standards. in accordance with the Road planning and
design manual, 2nd edition, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Road works in a state-controlled road require
approval under section 33 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 before the works commence.
Table 1.2.2: Environmental emissions
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Noise
Accommodation activities
PO23 Development involving an accommodation AO23.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is AO23.1 Complies
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and The development will comply with the identified noise
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed: criteria.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 21
Page 12
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
habitable rooms. all facades of the building envelope:
a. ≤60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am ≤40 dB(A))
b. ≤63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) façade corrected
(measured L90 (8 hour) free field between
10pm and 6am >40 dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
In some instances the design of noise barriers and
mounds to achieve the noise criteria above the
ground floor may not be reasonable or practicable. In
these instances, any relaxation of the criteria is at the
discretion of the Department of Transport and Main
Roads.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 21
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO23.2 Buildings which include a habitable room
are setback the maximum distance possible from
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO23.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so
that habitable rooms are located furthest from a
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO23.4 Buildings (other than a relevant
residential building or relocated building) are
designed and constructed using materials which
ensure that habitable rooms meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over
24 hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 21
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Habitable rooms of relevant residential buildings
located within a transport noise corridor must comply
with the Queensland Development Code MP4.4
Buildings in a transport noise corridor, Queensland
Government, 2015. Transport noise corridors are
mapped on the DA mapping system.
PO24 Development involving an accommodation AO24.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is
activity or land for a future accommodation provided which is designed, sited and
activity minimises noise intrusion from a state- constructed:
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
outdoor spaces for passive recreation. outdoor spaces for passive recreation:
a. ≤57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight ≤45
dB(A))
b. ≤60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free field
(measured L90 (18 hour) free field
between 6am and 12 midnight >45
dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 21
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO24.2 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor AO24.2 Complies
space for passive recreation which is shielded Outdoor spaces will be appropriately shielded from
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- state-controlled roads from buildings and vegetation.
modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
AND
AO24.3 Each dwelling with a balcony directly AO24.3 Complies
exposed to noise from a state-controlled road or The development contains no balconies directly
type 1 multi-modal corridor has a continuous facing a state-controlled road.
solid gap-free balustrade (other than gaps
required for drainage purposes to comply with
the Building Code of Australia).
Child care centres
PO25 Development involving a: AO25.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
2. educational establishment constructed:
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in indoor all facades of the building envelope:
education areas and indoor play areas. a. ≤58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour) façade corrected
(maximum hour during normal opening
hours)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 21
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-
comply setback distances for buildings stipulated by
the local planning instrument or relevant building
regulations should be used.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO25.2 Buildings which include indoor education
areas and indoor play areas are setback the
maximum distance possible from a state-
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so
that indoor
education areas and indoor play areas are
located furthest from the state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor.
AND
AO25.4 Buildings are designed and constructed
using materials which ensure indoor education
areas and indoor play areas meet the following
internal noise criteria:
1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 21
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report, prepared in accordance
with the State Development Assessment Provisions
Supporting Information – Community Amenity (Noise),
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, is
provided.
PO26 Development involving a: AO26.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or provided which is designed, sited and
2. educational establishment constructed:
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor each outdoor education area or outdoor play
education areas and outdoor play areas. area:
a. ≤63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free field
(between 6am and 6pm)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise
Management Code of Practice – Volume 1
Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
OR
AO26.2 Each outdoor education area and
outdoor play area is shielded from noise
generated from a state-controlled road or type 1
multi-modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 21
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Hospitals
PO27 Development involving a hospital AO27.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not Applicable
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled using materials which ensure patient care areas
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in patient meet the following internal noise criteria:
care areas. 1. ≤35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour
during opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be
measured in accordance with AS1055.1–1997
Acoustics – Description and measurement of
environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
noise assessment report is provided, prepared in
accordance with the State Development Assessment
Provisions Supporting Information – Community
Amenity (Noise), Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2013.
Vibration
Hospitals
PO28 Development involving a hospital AO28.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed Not Applicable
minimises vibration impacts from vehicles using to ensure vibration in the treatment area of a
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal patient care area does not exceed a vibration
corridor in patient care areas. dose value of 0.1m/s1.75.
AND
AO28.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed
to ensure vibration in the ward area of a patient
care area does not exceed a vibration dose
value of 0.4m/s1.75.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 21
Page 19
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified
vibration assessment report is provided.
Air and light
PO29 Development involving an accommodation AO29.1 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor AO29.1 Complies
activity minimises air quality impacts from a space for passive recreation which is shielded Outdoor spaces are appropriately sited.
state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
corridor in outdoor spaces for passive recreation. modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free
fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
PO30 Development involving a: AO30.1 Each outdoor education area and Not Applicable
1. child care centre; or outdoor play area is shielded from a state-
2. educational establishment controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by
minimises air quality impacts from a state- a building, solid gap-free fence, or other solid
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor in gap-free structure.
outdoor education areas and outdoor play areas.
PO31 Development involving an accommodation AO31.1 Buildings for an accommodation activity AO31.1 Complies
activity or hospital minimises lighting impacts or hospital are designed to minimise the number No windows are directly facing a state-controlled
from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi- of windows or transparent/translucent panels road.
modal corridor. facing a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
modal corridor.
OR
AO31.2 Windows facing a state-controlled road
or type 1 multi-modal corridor include treatments
to block light from a state-controlled road or type
1 multi-modal corridor.
Table 1.2.3: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 18 of 21
Page 20
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO32 Development does not impede delivery of AO32.1 Development is not located in a future AO32.1 Complies
a future state-controlled road. state-controlled road. Development is not located in a future state-
OR controlled road.
AO32.2 Development is sited and designed so
that permanent buildings, structures,
infrastructure, services or utilities are not located
in a future state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes
apply:
AO32.3 Structures and infrastructure located in a
future state-controlled road are able to be readily
relocated or removed without materially affecting
the viability or functionality of the development.
AND
AO32.4 Development does not involve filling and
excavation of, or material changes to, a future
state-controlled road.
AND
AO32.5 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre-
development condition at the completion of the
use.
PO33 Vehicular access to a future state- AO33.1 Development does not require new or PO33 Complies
controlled road is located and designed to not changed access between the premises and a See Appendix F – Site Access Advice.
create a safety hazard for users of a future state- future state-controlled road.
controlled road or result in a worsening of AND
operating conditions on a future state-controlled AO33.2 Vehicular access for the development is
road. consistent with the function and design of the
future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 19 of 21
Page 21
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: Where a new or changed access between the
premises and a future state-controlled road is
proposed, the Department of Transport and Main
Roads will need to assess the proposal to determine
if the vehicular access for the development is safe. An
assessment can be made by Department of Transport
and Main Roads as part of the development
assessment process and a decision under section 62
of Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 issued where
sufficient information is provided.
PO34 Filling, excavation, building foundations No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO34 Complies
and retaining structures do not undermine, or See response to PO4.
cause subsidence of, a future state-controlled
road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this
performance outcome, it is recommended that an
RPEQ certified geotechnical assessment is provided,
prepared in accordance with volume 3 of the Road
planning and design manual, 2nd edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO35 Fill material from a development site does AO35.1 Fill material is free of contaminants PO35 Complies
not result in contamination of land for a future including acid sulfate content. See response to PO4.
state-controlled road.
Note: Soil and rocks should be tested in accordance
with AS1289 – Methods of testing soils for
engineering purposes and AS4133 2005 – Methods of
testing rocks for engineering purposes.
AND
AO35.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in
accordance with the requirements of AS1289.0
2000 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 20 of 21
Page 22
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO36 Development does not result in an No acceptable outcome is prescribed. PO36 Complies
actionable nuisance, or worsening of, See Stormwater Management Report –
stormwater, flooding or drainage impacts in a Appendix G.
future state-controlled road.
PO37 Run-off from the development site is not AO37.1 Development does not create any new PO37 Complies
unlawfully discharged to a future state-controlled points of discharge to a future state-controlled See Stormwater Management Report –
road. road. Appendix G.
AND
AO37.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a
lawful point of discharge.
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply,
2013, provides further information on lawful points of
discharge.
AND
AO37.3 Development does not worsen the
condition of an existing lawful point of discharge
to the future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.0
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 21 of 21