Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Carmel Robinson - MCU25/0118
To: Assessment Manager- Noosa Shire Council Date:/d'/l 1/25 Re: Application Number MCU25/0118 Description: Development Permit for Material Change of Use by Coast2Bay for Multiple Dwellings-Affordable Rental Premises 25 X small dwellings plus one community room dwelling. Site Address: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy Qld 4563 on Lot 2 (part) SP348613 Formal Submission Requesting Refusal of Development Application I request that Council refuse the above development application for the following reasons: 1. Conflict With Zoning Intent The proposal is inconsistent with the Community Facilities (cemetery) zoning and undermines the long-term strategic purpose of land reserved for essential community infrastructure. 2. Precedent Risk Approval would weaken the integrity of Community Facilities zoning across the Shire and set an undesirable precedent for repurposing land intended for community needs. 3. Incompatible Scale and Character The proposed medium-density development is out of scale with the surrounding low-density neighbourhood and conflicts with the Cooroy Local Plan’s vision, resulting in loss of local character and amenity. 4. Unsuitable Location for Affordable Housing The site is too remote from shops, services, and public transport. Concentrating affordable or social housing in this location would create social disadvantage and is not supported by the Noosa Plan’s housing principles. 5. Traffic and Access Constraints Dianella Court is not designed to accommodate the traffic volumes and vehicle movements generated by the proposed development, creating safety concerns and reduced amenity for existing residents. 6. Loss of Future Community Infrastructure Capacity Using land intended for community purposes for residential development compromises Council’s ability to provide essential community facilities into the future. /7 ro 1 \ UOM
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Conclusion The proposal is inconsistent with zoning, incompatible with local character, poorly located, and detrimental to future community infrastructure. Accordingly, I request that Council refuse the application. Name: Signature: Address: //3// Xw cS7W Email (optional)
Used in these records
PM Submission - Carmel Robinson - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 784 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.