Original source · versioned page text
2015-07-21 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 21 JULY 2015
Policy Provisions – Where offsets may be Assessment of DTMR’s proposal
delivered
In general terms, the location of koala offset sites Generally meets this requirement as the offset is
should be informed by the needs and status of local occurring in part within koala habitat areas mapped
koala populations and koala habitat, and the as part of the proposed planning scheme
proximity and significance of the impact being offset amendments. For offsets proposed outside the
on local and regional koala populations and koala mapped areas, these areas are suitable for
habitat. rehabilitation and will provide connectivity to
adjacent bushland.
Koala offset sites should form part of, or contribute Generally meets this requirement as discussed
to, strategic koala habitat networks within the local above.
government area or the South East Queensland
region (as appropriate).
The location of koala offset sites may also be Re-vegetation of cleared lands will increase local
informed by: biodiversity. However, it is noted that the previous
The potential benefits arising from the koala tender document allowed for the clearing of
offsetting activity to other biodiversity. regrowth vegetation to establish the koala habitat
offset planting.
The ability of the koala offset site to
complement local and State recreational
open space outcomes.
The Guideline: Offset for Net Gain of Koala Habitat in South East Queensland Policy also
outlines how to determine the optimum location for an offset obligation stating that:
Generally the optimum location for an offset is as close as possible to where the habitat was
cleared. This is based on the principle that the offset contributes to establishing koala habitat to
benefit the koala population where the loss occurred. However, locating offsets in the immediate
vicinity of a development site may not always be possible or appropriate. In some cases, greater
conservation outcomes may be delivered by locating offsets elsewhere (e.g. within other
identified strategic koala offset networks). The following hierarchy of criteria (from most to least
important) can be used to help determine the optimum location for the offset.
1. development site (if appropriate)
2. same suburb/local plan/development control plan area as the development site
3. same waterway catchment or biodiversity corridor as the development site
4. same assessable development area of the SPRP
5. same local government area as the development site
6. adjoining local government area within the SEQ bioregion.
Sites that are not considered suitable include areas that present a high risk to koalas or areas
that are physically isolated from other koala habitat. This may include sites that are surrounded
by major road infrastructure, located along roads with high volumes of traffic and/or located within
urban environments where very little habitat and habitat connectivity exist.
For example, State-controlled roads and arterial roads generally carry high traffic volumes that
would create significant barriers to koala safe movement if no mitigation techniques were
employed (refer to Koala Sensitive Design Guideline). However, there is a capacity for koalas to
move throughout the landscape across lower traffic volume roads found in suburban and
residential areas (typically 50km/h or less).
Page 65 of 140
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.