Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Officer Report Dated 12 September 2023
The original of this document is very large (71.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 3, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 12 SEPTEMBER 2023 than the golf course and will generate significantly more traffic along Kabi Road to the detriment of nearby residents - currently 58 car trips during the week and 27 on Sundays compared to the proposed 352 car trips during the week and 116 on Sundays. The application is therefore recommended for refusal. RECOMMENDATION That Council note the report by the Acting Coordinator Planning Assessment to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 12 September 2023 regarding Application No. 131998.981211.5 for an Other Change to Development Approval (12637DA) - Integrated Permaculture Designed Organic Orchard and Golf Course Complex (18 holes) to include Group Farm Stay Accommodation (undefined use) and associated supporting infrastructure (maximum 299 beds), situated at 59 Kabi Rd Cootharaba and: A. Refuse the application for the following reasons: 1. The proposal does not further the SEQ Regional Plan 2017 strategy to intensify or diversify on-farm agricultural activities as the proposed permaculture and food production is not of a significant scale, largely intended for farm stay guests, will alienate agricultural land and compromise the rural production of the land. 2. The proposal is contrary to the Strategic Framework of the Noosa Plan 2020 as the proposed farm stay activity: a) Will permanently alienate land that is mapped as agricultural land conservation area and will not result in a direct expansion of the site’s agricultural activities. b) Will be more than complementary to the agricultural use of the land, as it will be the proposal’s primary use. c) Is not small scale or fit for its setting comprising 3 villages and a large common communal area with access via a small local rural road that currently has little traffic movement. 3. The proposal is contrary to Overall Outcomes 2(c), (h), (i) & (p), Performance & Acceptable Outcomes PO2, AO2.2, AO2.3, PO4 and PO5 of the Rural Zone Code of the Noosa Plan 2020 as: a) The applicant has failed to demonstrate there is an overwhelming need for the proposal to be located on land identified for Agricultural Land Conservation and the proposal will further alienate land from rural production in the future. b) The scale of the farm stay activity is not small scale, and the traffic anticipated to be generated would detract from the rural amenity enjoyed by nearby residents. 4. The proposal is contrary to Performance Outcome PO3 of the Visitor Accommodation Code as it is of a scale that is not compatible with the zoning intent and preferred character for the local area. 5. The proposal does not meet PO6 of the Bushfire Hazard Overlay Code as it has not been demonstrated that an efficient and safe evacuation route is available to residents and that emergency vehicles can access the site.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.