Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Officer Report Dated 12 September 2023
The original of this document is very large (71.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 31, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
3. CONSULTATION
3.1. Referral Agencies
Not applicable
3.2. Internal Council Referrals
The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers:
• Coordinator Operational Works
• Senior Environment Officer
• Waste Collection Officer
• Technical Officer
3.3. Public Notification
The application was publicly notified for 15 business days in accordance with the Planning Act
2016. Two properly made submissions were received. The following table provides a summary
and assessment of the issues raised by submitters.
Matters Raised Comments
The existing approval the applicant seeks While Kabi Road golf course has not operated for
to change has lapsed when the previous some time, the use is not considered to be
owner closed the business. The closure abandoned (and thus the approval has not lapsed)
of the golf course was widely given the golf course and orchards remain on site,
acknowledged in 2011. the property has been for sale during this time and
skeletal staff have continued to maintain the
property.
The scale of the proposal conflicts with the Agreed – as detailed above the size of the
acceptable outcomes for development in buildings and total gross floor area are
the Rural Zone as described in the Noosa inconsistent with the intent of Rural zoning and
Plan 2020. The proposal exceeds a scale character of the area.
and intensity that could be reasonably
considered compatible with the intent of
the zone and preferred character of the
local area in which it is located. It also
significantly alters the site’s character and
impacts compared to the original Kabi Golf
Course and Orchard approval.
The applicant has failed to prove an Agreed – whilst the site has a connection to the
overriding need in the public interest for rural setting there is limited community benefit for
the development, which would overcome the proposals use of agricultural land.
its conflicts with the Noosa Plan 2020.
There has been considerable backlash
against short term accommodation
proposals across the shire and more
tourism is not needed in Noosa, with the
industry already finding it difficult to secure
and accommodate staff.
The inclusion of Lot 650 increases the The submitters concerns are noted but the
potential development area by 40ha and inclusion of Lot 650 as part of another change
seemingly assists the applicant to application is permitted under the Planning Act
increase the gross floor area and visitor 2016.
numbers. It is unclear what is planned for
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.