Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object - Mark Sullivan MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 15

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                      The proposed development is not consistent with the reasonable expectations of
                       residents in the locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan site is to primarily provide for
                       budget visitor accommodation, which is in the public interest;

                      The Proposed development does not in any way conform to the written advice, cited
                       below, from the Council to the developer prior to the pre-lodgment meeting held on 14
                       December 2016 (between Council and the developer):

                       The Open Space Recreation zone in Peregian Beach specifically seeks to protect and retain
                       the site for low cost visitor accommodation needs reflective of the site’s previous use as a
                       caravan park, but also acknowledges that a range of visitor accommodation may be
                       provided where integrated with budget accommodation. There is no support given to
                       permanent residents on the site.

                       It is noted that the current approval included only visitor accommodation, with no
                       permanent resident accommodation proposed. This approved development was supported
                       by Council through an appeal process as it was acknowledged that it included low to mid
                       cost visitor accommodation being a reasonable alternative to the Planning Scheme’s
                       intent to retain the caravan park.

                       It is considered the current proposal does not meet the Planning Scheme’s intent for the
                       site as there is a lack of and a limited range of visitor accommodation proposed…….

                      The Noosa Council has correctly performed, as reflected in the cited correspondence
                       above, its role as custodian of what was formerly publicly (ratepayer) owned land by
                       informing the developer that the DA proposal does not comply with the requirements
                       requested by the Council in regard to provision of low cost, non-permanent
                       accommodation. For Noosa Council to now allow the development application would be a
                       failure of its duty to the Noosa ratepayers.

                      There are no grounds provided that are sufficient to overcome the level of conflict
                       identified with the Noosa Plan.

             The proposed development application should be refused for the above reasons.

             Kind regards,

             Mark Sullivan
             4 Tern St
             Peregian Beach
             4573 QLD




Document Set ID: 20306256
Version: 1, Version Date: 21/04/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Mark Sullivan MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.