Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Original source · versioned page text

PM Submission Object ADDITIONAL - Bruce Molloy - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                 From:                 Bruce
                 Sent:                 25 Apr 2017 15:46:18 +1000
                 To:                   Mailbox Council Mail
                 Subject:              Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal



                 Att: Patrick Murphy

                 Assessment Officer, Noosa Shire Council

                 [email protected]



                 Dear Mr Murphy,

                 File No MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041

                 Postal Address 215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH

                 Proposed Development Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accommodation



                 1) This Material Change of use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy
                 Peregian’s point of difference & the attraction of our village for residents, holiday makers &
                 shoppers. The Caravan Park amenity, that was the real ‘essence’ of Peregian village, will be
                 replaced by urban density with scarce landscaping to soften the architectural bulk & concrete
                 structures.

                 2) There’s No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with most the accommodation
                 proposed for Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly
                 provides low cost visitor accommodation for the needs of this community nor the wider Noosa
                 Shire. Peregian Beach has already been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing
                 developments that lack public amenity, open space & village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation
                 for campers & RVs would be an acceptable community solution, celebrating the open space &
                 providing a beach holiday experience for all.

                 3) Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St
                 Renewal which is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community
                 consultation process intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage
                 increased usage. The leafy ambience planned for both Rufous laneway & Pocket Park to
                 encourage parking & pedestrian access to the village would be greatly compromised by the 2m
                 proximity & 7m height of the proposed Reed & Wallum buildings, on top of whatever level of
                 fill is added to natural ground level.




Document Set ID: 20307808
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object ADDITIONAL - Bruce Molloy - MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 130 KB (small file)

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

                 4) The Development’s significant impact on the Creek & Wetland, both during construction &
                 upon completion is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of &
                 beside this ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park – Emu Swamp Section.
                 The natural spring, recognised in the 1960s & probably for thousands of years by our indigenous
                 forebears, known locally as Little Rufous Creek creates a watercourse that feeds into the wetland
                 & contributes to its ecological value.

                 Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at
                 least 3 months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low
                 Way, down Sandpiper Court, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St
                 roundabout. The impacts of such large amounts of fill, will create fragmentation & attrition of
                 the watercourse, its habitat values & biodiversity - an environmental injustice for Qld Govt’s
                 identified Mandatory Essential Habitat.

                 There is no reference in the DA to the planned disturbance to essential wetland habitat for the
                 vulnerable Wallum Froglet (Crinia tinnula), Wallum Rocketfrog (Litoria freycinet), Wallum
                 Sedgefrog (Litoria oblongburensis), nor the impact on wetland heathland & sedgeplain,
                 inhabited by the vulnerable Ground Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) recorded less than 500ms from
                 the site.

                 5) Significant & continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining
                 streets, laneway, PB Hotel, Hardware store, business & private premises near the roadways &
                 roundabout is guaranteed. The impact will be to the detriment of acoustic & visual qualities,
                 lifestyle, holiday village ambience & business, especially the al fresco dining/coffee shops that
                 all enjoy fresh air & ocean sounds.

                 6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic
                 queues currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times,
                 exacerbated further during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a
                 serious source ofadditional congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to
                 mitigate in the future.

                 7) Foreground Vistas of the wetland & its vegetation across Noosa National Park-Emu Swamp
                 Section to Mt Cooroy will be diminished, in fact lost, to the bulky Hotel/Motel building’s
                 projected heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current
                 expansive views are maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of
                 Noosa’s logo ‘Different by Nature’ by altering design or lowering the amount of fill to protect
                 the invaluable amenity of open space & ‘community vistas’.

                 8) Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision
                 of scarce green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the
                 provision of public access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend
                 passive surveillance, particularly at night. Light pollution is a further issue as every new light
                 bulb impacts adversely on Peregian’s disappearing night sky, particularly of concern with the
                 density planned for this site.




Document Set ID: 20307808
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017

Page 3

                 9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s
                 Master Plan for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north-western
                 corner’s existing vegetation could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish
                 the precinct for visitors & local community with potential to make genuine connections between
                 Rufous St /laneway with this development. Instead, it separates itself from the village feel, in
                 fact opposes the local residential community & village activities associated with the function &
                 interaction of Veggie Village, Tennis Club, Kindergarten & Community House, all nearby
                 neighbours of the planned development.

                 This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those whochoose
                 this relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead,
                 undesirable urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much
                 sought after open space linkages, relaxed village character & community engagement.

                 Bruce Molloy




Document Set ID: 20307808
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.