Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2018-05-08 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

of 125

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (14.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                        8 MAY 2018


Roof pitch
The revised plans detail a revised roof pitch of 2 degrees for the main roof form with secondary
roof lines of up to 9 degrees. The 2017 approved plans detail and approved a 4 degree main roof
pitch.
The revised roof form will not be imposing to the surrounding area and maintains variation
through different roof lines. Due to the overall height of the building, variation of the balconies,
multiple roof and eave lines the reduced roof pitch does not detract from the character of the area
or building.
Height
Council has previously agreed to relaxations on the site for height on the basis that the sites
slope down from the road and the buildings are set down below the road and are not visible to
the surrounding area. The revised plans reduce the maximum height of the building from 15.84
meters to 15.74 metres whilst also changing the areas of encroachment over 15 metres.
It is noted that encroachment is generally located to the centre of the building and will not be
readily visible. The project architect details that:
   The overall encroachment is the same if not less.
   The encroachment areas have not been increased they have been moved.
   The encroachment has been pulled away from the street to reduce the visual impact.
   The portion at the middle of the roof, is on a clerestory roof that is generally less visible
     than the primary roof.
The following images and table provide a comparison of the intrusion above the 15 metre limit for
the existing approval and the current proposal for building 4A.




                            Figure 8: Approved building 4A – height blanket




                                                                                   Page 83 of 125
Log in to download the original file

2018-05-08 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda(PDF, 14MB).pdf · 14.7 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.