Council archive · source document
Negotiated Report (Representations made) MCU24 0022 · MCU24/0022
REQUEST FOR NEGOTIATED DECISION REPORT
Author Development Planner, Cameron Smith
Development Assessment
APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No. MCU24/0022
Development Approval Material Change of Use - Home-based business (Home
hosted accommodation)
Applicant Robyn Anne Grant
Representations Received On 3 June 2024
Number of Submissions for N/A
Original Application
Report reviewed Tara Norley – 28 June 2024
PROPERTY DETAILS
Property Address 5 Adams St Sunshine Beach Qld 4567
RP Description Lot 547 RP 48112
Land Area 511 m²
Existing Use of Land Dwelling House
STATUTORY DETAILS
SEQRP Designation Urban Footprint
Zone Low Density Residential
Precinct Not Applicable
Local Plan Area Coastal Communities
Assessment Type Representations made to original approval
1. BACKGROUND
A development approval (MCU24/0022) for a Material Change of Use - Home-based business
(home hosted accommodation) was issued on 17 May 2024.
During the assessment of the application, it was identified that unapproved frontage works had
occurred previously in the verge to instal an informal car parking space (Refer Figure 1).
Page 1 of 4
Document Set ID: 23050928
Version: 5, Version Date: 04/07/2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
It was also identified that the driveway had not been constructed to council standard when the
dwelling was constructed. The development permit issued was conditioned to require a further
operational works permit to undertake works to reconstruct the driveway crossover lawfully and
remove/reinstate the verge where the car park has been installed.
Figure 1 – Streetview showing existing (unapproved) frontage works
The applicant suspended the appeal period and made representations on 3 June 2024 to the
development approval conditions. The representations are detailed below but primarily relate to:
• Contesting the requirement for frontage works and street upgrades to be undertaken in
accordance with an operational works approval
The applicant has requested the works to be conditioned without the need for a separate
operational works approval.
2. ASSESSMENT
An assessment in relation to each of the submitted representations is provided below:
Condition 13
13. Adam Street must be upgraded for the length of its frontage to the subject site. The works
must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in
particular:
a. removal of the gravel carpark adjacent to existing driveway crossover; and
b. reinstatement of the verge area to match the balance of the site frontage, including the
provision of topsoil and turf where the existing verge is grassed.
Applicant’s Representation
We seek to suspend the appeal period and make the following change representations to delete
the wording strikethrough below to condition 13 of the decision notice:
13. Adam Street must be upgraded for the length of its frontage to the subject site. The works must
be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in particular:
a. removal of the gravel carpark adjacent to existing driveway crossover; and
b. reinstatement of the verge area to match the balance of the site frontage, including the provision
of topsoil and turf where the existing verge is grassed.
Page 2 of 4
Document Set ID: 23050928
Version: 5, Version Date: 04/07/2024
Page 3
The owner understands the gravel carpark adjacent to the crossover shall be removed and
reinstated with grass. There is no requirement for a separate operational works application for
these works.
Please amend the condition and issue the negotiated decision at your earliest convenience.
Assessment of Representation
Internal advice was sought from engineering on the request to amend part of Condition 13,
removing the requirement for an operational works permit to undertake the remediation works
along the frontage of the subject site.
Recommendation has been provided to uphold the original condition within the decision notice in
full and therefore refuse the representations made.
The required reinstatement works are to take place in the road reserve and as such need to be
undertaken in accordance with a separate development permit for operational works. It is noted
that Condition 14 already requires and necessitates the need for an operational works approval for
the driveway crossover. It would be reasonable for the reinstatement works to be included in the
same application as the one required for the driveway crossover.
There are no proposed changes to the approved plan.
3. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
The applicant had made representations on 3 June 2024 to amend part of Condition 13 of the
decision notice issued by council on 17 May 2024 for a Material Change of Use - Home-based
business (Home hosted accommodation).
The request was made to amend Condition 13 as follows:
13. Adam Street must be upgraded for the length of its frontage to the subject site. The works
must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in
particular:
a. removal of the gravel carpark adjacent to existing driveway crossover; and
b. reinstatement of the verge area to match the balance of the site frontage, including the
provision of topsoil and turf where the existing verge is grassed.
The request made in the representations has been refused by council on the basis that:
• Condition 13 is considered reasonable and relevant
• The nature of the works required facilitate the need for an operational works approval
• An operational works approval is required already by virtue of Condition 14
• A future operational works application can be combined between the driveway crossover
and the frontage (verge) works
Page 3 of 4
Document Set ID: 23050928
Version: 5, Version Date: 04/07/2024
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
With regard to Application No. MCU24/0022, and the representations made, Council on 28 June
2024 decided to:
Refuse to the representations made for the following reasons:
1. The remediation works are to be undertaken on land in which council is the authority and
trustee;
2. The remediation works would require reasonable and relevant conditions which are specific
to an operational works approval;
3. An operational works approval is already required by Condition 14 of the original decision
notice, and;
4. The remediation works can reasonably be combined with the operational works application
for the driveway crossover.
Page 4 of 4
Document Set ID: 23050928
Version: 5, Version Date: 04/07/2024
Used in these records
Negotiated Report (Representations made) MCU24 0022.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 601 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.