Council archive · source document
Negotiated Report (Representations made) MCU24 0022 · MCU24/0022
The owner understands the gravel carpark adjacent to the crossover shall be removed and
reinstated with grass. There is no requirement for a separate operational works application for
these works.
Please amend the condition and issue the negotiated decision at your earliest convenience.
Assessment of Representation
Internal advice was sought from engineering on the request to amend part of Condition 13,
removing the requirement for an operational works permit to undertake the remediation works
along the frontage of the subject site.
Recommendation has been provided to uphold the original condition within the decision notice in
full and therefore refuse the representations made.
The required reinstatement works are to take place in the road reserve and as such need to be
undertaken in accordance with a separate development permit for operational works. It is noted
that Condition 14 already requires and necessitates the need for an operational works approval for
the driveway crossover. It would be reasonable for the reinstatement works to be included in the
same application as the one required for the driveway crossover.
There are no proposed changes to the approved plan.
3. CONCLUSION & REASONS FOR DECISION
The applicant had made representations on 3 June 2024 to amend part of Condition 13 of the
decision notice issued by council on 17 May 2024 for a Material Change of Use - Home-based
business (Home hosted accommodation).
The request was made to amend Condition 13 as follows:
13. Adam Street must be upgraded for the length of its frontage to the subject site. The works
must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in
particular:
a. removal of the gravel carpark adjacent to existing driveway crossover; and
b. reinstatement of the verge area to match the balance of the site frontage, including the
provision of topsoil and turf where the existing verge is grassed.
The request made in the representations has been refused by council on the basis that:
• Condition 13 is considered reasonable and relevant
• The nature of the works required facilitate the need for an operational works approval
• An operational works approval is required already by virtue of Condition 14
• A future operational works application can be combined between the driveway crossover
and the frontage (verge) works
Page 3 of 4
Document Set ID: 23050928
Version: 5, Version Date: 04/07/2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Negotiated Report (Representations made) MCU24 0022.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 601 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.