Original source · versioned page text
RFI - updated flood investigation report
The original of this document is very large (21.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 14, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
changed from 720min to the 120min, with the TUFLOW hydraulic model considered a better
representation of flow routing within the catchment.
Table 3-4: 1% AEP Peak Flow Comparison
Parameter Value Value
Sub-Catchment 1A 2C
WBNM (Hydrology) 8.1 (720min) 33.0 (720 min)
TUFLOW (Hydraulics) 7.5 (120 min) 33.5 (120 min)
Difference -0.6 +0.5
A comparison of the peak 1% (2100) AEP flood levels from the NSC flood search and TUFLOW
model results from this investigation is presented below in Figure 3-1. This highlights that the
estimated levels are a close match across the site with a levels at the downstream boundary
of the site slightly higher in this current investigation (which is considered to create a
conservative outcome). As such it is considered that a suitable verification between the NSC
regional flood model and the current investigation has been achieved.
12.56
.36
13.36
12.37
.36
12.37
13.00
Figure 3-1: NSC Flood Search Levels (orange box) versus Site Model Results (white box)
21-0288-FS001-V3 | Flood Investigation | 60 Glenridge Drive, Cooroibah |9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.