Original source · versioned page text
RFI - updated flood investigation report
The original of this document is very large (21.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 18, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
4.3.2.2. Afflux
Afflux mapping has been undertaken for the 63.2%, 39%, 10% and 1% AEP to identify whether
there are any impacts resulting, and if so, whether an alternative development arrangement
needs to be investigated. Afflux maps have been provided in Appendix H.
The afflux mapping shows that there are no external impacts resulting to any adjoining
properties as a result of the development. An increase in flood levels of up to 330mm is
estimated upstream of the proposed Internal Road extension in the 1% (2100) AEP, however,
this is contained within the site boundary.
4.3.2.3. Flood Storage
A flood storage assessment has been completed over the site to ensure there is no loss of
flood plain storage as a result of the development. For the existing flood storage calculation,
the existing peak 1% (2100) AEP flood surface was compared to the existing model terrain.
Similarly with the proposed flood storage calculation, the proposed peak 1% (2100) AEP flood
surface was compared to the proposed model terrain. Details of the flood plain storage in
the existing and proposed cases is summarised below in Table 4-4, where it is shown there is
an increase in the amount of flood storage as a result of the development, which is
considered positive outcome.
Table 4-4: 1% (2100) AEP Flood Storage Comparison.
Scenario Flood Plain Storage (m3)
Existing 36,831
Proposed 45,932
Difference +9,102
4.3.2.4. Internal Road
The Internal Road extension has been designed achieve flood immunity in the 10% AEP
event, whilst allowing some overtopping in the 1% AEP (major event). The high point of the
road (which acts as a weir) is at a minimum 12.81m AHD (refer Figure 4-1). This results in a
flow depth of less 0.2m occurring over the road pavement in the 1% AEP, with flow velocities
less than 1.6 m/s and flow hazard less than 0.3m2/s. These parameters are below the
trafficability requirements of QUDM, which require a maximum depth of 0.2m and hazard less
than 0.3m2/s in the 1% AEP event.
The new culverts have a flow velocity of 2.1m/s. Outlet scour protection will be required to
be provided with D50=200mm rock provided and extend 3.0m past apron.
It is recommended that appropriate depth markers and flood warning signs be placed on
either side of the internal road flood extents to warn residents of flood risk and depth of water
over road should it overtop.
21-0288-FS001-V3 | Flood Investigation | 60 Glenridge Drive, Cooroibah | 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.