Original source · versioned page text
Development Application Part 2 - Report/ Plans
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnKHA DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS 100350 -
JUNE 2012
Queensland Koala Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions has identified that the proposed
development will require assessment against the relevant assessment criteria, as it involves
reconfiguring a lot that will result in the creation of an additional lot. Compliance with the relevant
assessment criteria in the context of the proposed development is outlined below:
T bl 7D . t’ K I A bl D . tA
Column 1 Assessable Proposal Column 2 Assessment criteria Proposal
development to which for assessable development
Division 7 does not apply
1. Development for a domestic Does not apply 1. To the extent the premises is Not Applicable
activity. The proposal is not for outside the Urban Footprint and The site is within the
a ’domestic activity’ not in an urban area under a urban footprint
2. Development on premises that planning scheme, site design does
will not result in any of the not result in the clearing of non-
following: juvenile koala habitat trees in
a. clearing of native Does not Apply areas of bushland habitat.
vegetation that will result in No substantial clearing
a total cleared area of more is required/ proposed. 2. To the extent the premises is Not Applicable
than 500 m2; inside the Urban Footprint, site The site is not mapped
b. a new building or Applies design must avoid clearing non- as ’bushland habitat’. No
extension and any The proposed juvenile koala habitat trees in areas of bushland
reasonably associated reconfiguration is areas of bushland habitat, with habitat will be cleared.
infrastructure that will result associated with an any unavoidable clearing
in a total development approved unit minimised and offset in
footprint of more than 500 development over the accordance with the Offsets for
m2; land. Net Gain of Koala Habitat in
South East Queensland Policy at a
c. extracting gravel, rock or Does not apply ratio of five new koala habitat
sand from an area of more No extraction is trees for every one non-juvenile
than 5,000 m2; proposed koala habitat tree removed or an
equivalent cash contribution.
d. the excavation or filling of Does not apply
an area of more than 5,000 No excavation or filling 3. Site design must avoid clearing Not Applicable
m2. over an areaexceeding non-juvenile koala habitat trees in The site is not mapped
5000m2 is proposed areas of high value rehabilitation as ’rehabilitation
habitat, and medium value habitat’.
3. Reconfiguring a lot that will not Applies rehabilitation habitat, with any
result in the creation of an The proposal is not for unavoidable clearing minimised
additional lot. reconfiguring a lot and offset in accordance with the
Offsets for Net Gain of Koala
Habitat in South East Queensland
Policy at a ratio of five new koala
ha bitat trees for every one non-
juvenile koala habitat tree
removed or an equivalent cash
contribution.
4. Site design provides safe koala Not Applicable
movement opportunities as Site assessment in
appropriate to the development accordance with
type and habitat connectivity schedule 2 reveals that
values of the site determined by the site is cleared, with
reference to the factors for no particular ecological
consideration in Schedule 2. attributes. The site is
mapped as generally not
suitable and surrounded
by established
residential development.
No koala movement
opportunities exist or are
applicable.
5. During construction phases: Not Applicable
a. measures are taken in There will not be any
construction practices to not increased risks to Koala
increase the risk of death or during the construction
injury to koalas; and of the proposal.
b. native vegetation that is Not Applicable
cleared and in an area No clearinq of native
Development Application For Reconfiguring a Lot Page 7
2 Lots and Common Property
42 Avocet Parade, Peregian Beach
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.