Council archive · source document
Coastal Hazard Assessment · MCU25/0087
Very large file (15.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 29, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
17 The Esplanade, Sunshine Beach Report Figure 5-2: (Vellinga, 1983) shows a conceptual representation of the profiles of the erosion and accretion zones associated with storm. The Department provides the following recommendation in relation to defining a storm event: “For a tide-dominated coast where storm tide levels can be large, the parameters adopted for the minimum design storm are: Storm tide level corresponding to an average recurrence interval of 1-in-100 years: and, Wave height for a moderate storm using the 1-in-20 year significant wave height (Hs). However, for wave-dominated coastlines where extreme storm tide levels can be relatively minor, such as the Gold Coast, the significant wave height and duration of the storm event are major factors influencing short-term erosion, rather than storm tide. Hence it may be necessary to consider a larger wave event (for example, a storm event with a 1-in-100 ARI) and a moderate storm tide level. Decisions on appropriate parameters to be used must be based on local conditions and the experience of the coastal engineer undertaking the assessment.” In relation to the probability of such an event occurring the (Department of Environment and Heritage Protection, 2013) states: “Although the abovementioned probability of occurrence may appear to be fairly high, it is considered that this choice is reasonable when considered in conjunction with the method used to determine erosion prone area widths. This method implies that the erosion prone area has sufficient width to accommodate the design storm erosion in 100 years’ time, when all of the estimated long-term erosion has occurred. Therefore, it also follows that for much of the 100-year planning period, the erosion prone area is sufficient to accommodate a larger storm than the one selected for design purposes. In fact, in the most critical last 10 years of such a planning period, there is only a 10% probability of occurrence of the design storm. Thus, the risk of a storm breaching the entire erosion prone area at some time during the 100-year period will be significantly less than 63%.” This assessment has adopted a combination of a 100-year ARI Storm Tide level and 100-year ARI significant wave height as the design storm event for the reassessment of erosion prone area. It should be noted that the joint probability of a combined 100-year ARI storm tide and 100-year ARI significant wave height is likely to be significantly greater than a 100-year ARI storm event. The design parameters for the assessment of the short-term beach erosion are presented in Table 5-2. 252662-MN-RP-CO-0001B | 10 November 2025 | Page 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Coastal Hazard Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 15.7 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.