Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Council archive · source document

Coastal Hazard Assessment · MCU25/0087

of 93

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (15.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 37, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

                                           17 The Esplanade, Sunshine Beach                              Report


The beach profile adopted by BMT (2018) for ETA 602 is shown in Figure 5-11 and was derived from
(LIDAR, 2016) data combined with the Sunshine Coast Bathymetric (Department of Environment and
Science, 2011) for the nearshore section.
The beach profile for this assessment (refer Figure 5-11) was based on detailed site survey (refer
Appendix C) supplemented with a Digital Elevation Model (ELVIS, 2024) for the stable high dune
areas. The profiles are different and this impacts on the extent of erosion that may occur during the
adopted design storm event.




                           Figure 5-11 ETA 602 Beach profile and storm ETA 2100

5.3.2   Depth of Closure
The depth of closure adopted BMT (2018) was -11.5m AHD. However, M&N has adopted a depth of
closure of -12m AHD. This difference is unlikely to significantly alter the Bruun Rule calculation.
5.3.3   Dune of Toe
BMT (2018) determined the dune toe position by utilising the manually digitised coastline from the
Department of Resources and incorporating the Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT) contour.
M&N have adopted a level of 2.3m AHD as the toe of the dune based on site inspection (seaward
edge of vegetation) and detailed survey (refer Section 2.4).
5.3.4   Active beach width and height
The active beach width represents the horizontal distance from the dune crest to the depth of closure.
According to BMT (2018) and M&N, the adopted active beach width measures 525m and 520m,
respectively. The variation in these measurements is attributed to BMT's approach of taking the dune
location as the frontal dune.
5.3.5   Dune height
Figure 5-12 Dune heights and beach profile shows the dune heights adopted by BMT (2018) and
M&N against the beach profile adopted for the assessment in this report. BMT (2018) adopted 4.9m
AHD which corresponds to the frontal dune and therefore underestimates the reserve of sand
available in the dune system. M&N adopted a dune height of 15m AHD which was determine over an
iterative process (see Section 5.2.3).




                                                               252662-MN-RP-CO-0001B | 10 November 2025 | Page 32

Used in these records

About this file

File size
15.7 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Coastal Hazard Assessment.pdf · 15.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.