Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Council archive · source document

Coastal Hazard Assessment · MCU25/0087

of 93

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Very large file (15.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

Original PDF page 72, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

SandMap – Report of Survey for Sunshine Beach Profiles



           Seabed coverage
                  Method to ensure seabed coverage criteria is met
           Survey lines were run along pre-determined profiles and met up with land based survey work.
           Cross lines were run across the survey as a check.

                  Echo sounder pulse repetition rate
           Ping rate was 20 pings per second at 20m range.

                  Beam widths along and across track
           Beamwidth for the CEE ECHO system was 9° in diameter.

                  Survey vessel speed over ground
           SOG was generally 6 knots on average to maintain good data density and to ensure safe
           operation close to the beach.

                  Rejection criteria for line running
           Distance from profile line was set at 2m. Any deviation from this maximum limit was run
           again.

           Calibration and quality assurance
           Equipment was mounted to a fixed bracket and a pole and as such offsets were measured and
           incorporated within the software prior to the commencement of this survey. This
           arrangement has been used for many surveys in the past.
           All results for the checks detailed below can be found in Appendix C: Calibration Checks.

                  Static calibration method
           The Altus NR3 RTK GNSS unit was used to capture the beach profiles out to as deep as possible
           at low tide to provide overlap with the single beam acquired data. This overlap effectively
           established a small reference surface at each profile for comparison.
           Results were very good overall, especially noting the potential for sand movement in the surf
           zone area. There was approximately 4 hours between the RTK GNS


           S pole shots in the surf and the SBES acquired data due to having to wait for tides.
           Results detailed at Appendix C: Calibration Checks.




Rev. no.    Doc No.                                        Version Date          Doc Approver
  1         P0100-20251020                                 20/10/2025            Rod Tansley                        Page 11 of 20

                      The controlled version of this document is registered. All other versions are uncontrolled.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
15.7 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Coastal Hazard Assessment.pdf · 15.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.