Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

TTM Traffic report

Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0137 Response to NC Information request - 5/8 Selkirk Drve Noosaville.

of 10

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

        Used Council parking rates to determine gym parking demands.

The gym parking demands and surveyed parking demands of the existing site were then added to determine
suitability of Unit 5 to operate as a gym. This analysis determined that a gym operating from Unit 5 would
result in a minimum parking availability of 16 spaces, or 17% of the existing parking supply.

Further, TTM recommended classes are limited to ensure suitable parking availability for the primary industrial
use on site.

This analysis followed a standard methodology. This analysis has been further interrogated and it is TTM’s
opinion that issues raised by Council in the Information Request are generally addressed in the preliminary
parking assessment, as will be detailed in this letter.

A key overarching principle of this assessment is that existing peak parking demands on site are approximately
50% of Council’s parking requirement at 1 space per 99m2 Unit Area. This is consistent with:

       Surveys of several industrial sites with multiple tenancies.

       Parking requirements in several other planning schemes in Queensland.

The Units range in size from 199m2 to 719m2 with an average size of 367m2. These Unit sizes are more
conducive to warehouse uses (8 of the 12 occupied tenancies are warehouse uses) or personal/industrial
storage. Both uses are low traffic generating with relatively low staff and customer parking demands. These
tenancy sizes are not conducive to manufacturing, general retail or distribution activities which may generate
higher parking demands.

For these reasons, the surveyed parking demands are anticipated to be generally reflective of future parking
demands, regardless of change of tenancies. As the parking demands are lower than the approved number of
parking spaces, the site has suitable parking availability for a gym to operate in Unit 5, subject to conditions on
the number, size and times of classes.

3. Information Request Response

    3.1. Existing Tenant (Item 1a)

The applicant has advised that Blink Living Pty Ltd are the current tenant of Unit 5 at 8 Selkirk Drive. Parking
demand for this tenant was included in the parking assessment.

    3.2. Future Tenants (Item 1b)

The Information Request states that the development is approved for Industrial Business Type 1 (warehouse)
and Industrial Business Type 2 (light industrial) under the Noosa Plan. The parking requirement for Industrial
Business Type 1 was addressed in the parking assessment and does not require further review. The Noosa Plan
states that Industrial Business Type 2 must supply the following vehicle parking:
Log in to download the original file

TTM Traffic report.pdf · 830 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.