Skip to the record
Noosa's #1 Council Tracker.

Original source · versioned page text

TTM Traffic report

Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0137 Response to NC Information request - 5/8 Selkirk Drve Noosaville.

of 10

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

        Membership levels are commercially sensitive and may not be provided by gym operators.

       Parking rates for a gym are defined in The Noosa Plan 2006.

For these reasons, undertaking parking surveys of other sites is not warranted. In lieu of surveys, a sensitivity
analysis is considered an appropriate method to determine site parking demands with the gym. TTM have
undertaken a sensitivity analysis which includes:

       Anticipated maximum patronage at 30 minute intervals through the day. This is based on the
        methodology in section 5 and Table 3 in the preliminary parking assessment. Class schedules assessed
        include:

             o   Current class schedule for a Tuesday at Fernwood Morayfield (Attachment 1); and

             o   Amended class schedule based on TTM’s recommendations in Section 7 of the preliminary
                 parking assessment. This requires the removal of the 11:15 Yoga class to reduce any potential
                 overlap of patronage from 11:30 to 2:00pm.

       Surveyed parking site parking demands extrapolated from tenanted Units to all Units excluding Unit
        5.

       Gym parking scenarios assessed:

             o   3 persons per car (Council parking rate);

             o   2 persons per car (parking demands 50% higher than Council’s parking rate); and

             o   1.5 persons per car (parking demands 100% higher than Council’s parking rate).

Gym parking demands are unlikely to be higher than 1.5 persons per car due to:

       Public and active transport;
       Car sharing; and
       Patrons/staff getting dropped off.

As such, the application of a parking demand of 1.5 persons per car for the gym use results in a maximum gym
parking demand for the scenarios assessed and further sensitivity analysis is not warranted. Actual gym parking
demands may be higher than Council’s parking rate, however is likely to fall somewhere in the range of
scenarios assessed.

This sensitivity analysis is provided in Attachment 2 (electronic file) and can be interrogated Council.

Figure 1 shows the worst case site parking demands with the existing Morayfield Class schedule and a gym
parking demand of 1.5 persons per car.
Log in to download the original file

TTM Traffic report.pdf · 830 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.