Original source · versioned page text
2019-04-09 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 APRIL 2019
The applicant has requeted to make a minor change to a development approval under s78 of the
Planning Act 2016. An application for a minor change to a development approval can only be
made in circumstances where a change would constitute a ‘minor change’.
The proposed change to the development approval requested by the applicant is determined to
constitute a minor change on the grounds that:
the development would not result in substantially different development as the use and built
form are not significantly altered;
the change does not include prohibited development;
the change would not require the application to be referred to an additional referral agency
or cause a referral agency to have regard to new matters prescribed by regulation;
where the original application was code assessable, the change would not cause the
application to become impact assessable.
3.2. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme
The applicant seeks to amend condition 2.
Condition 2 Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally
comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the
following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
1620/DA/1.02 D Existing/Demolition Ground Floor Plan 15/05/17
1620/DA/2.01 P Proposed Basement Plan – Stage 4 28/07/17
1620/DA/2.02 L Proposed Ground Floor Plan – Stage 4 28/07/17
1620/DA/2.05 K Proposed Roof Plan – Stage 4 28/07/17
1620/DA/3.01 G Sections – Stage 4 28/07/17
1620/DA/4.01 K Elevations – Stage 4 28/07/17
1620/DA/5.01 G Landscape Concept Strategy – Plan 28/07/17
1620/DA/5.02 E Landscape Concept Strategy 28/07/17
For clarity, in regard to Plan No. 1620/DA/2.02 Rev. L Proposed Ground Floor Plan – Stage
4 dated 28/07/17 the maximum number of gaming machines is limited to 195 machines.
Applicant’s Request
The applicant requests that condition 2 be amended to reflect the building façade as constructed
on site. The applicant states:
As seen below, the current Pelican Street façade of the RSL building is considered to be
generally consistent with the stamped plans referenced within the decision notice. Whilst the
timber look aluminium louvres are slightly different to that approved by Council, the chosen
materials are still considered to be in keeping with the heritage character of Tewantin and thus
complies with Condition 12 of the decision notice.
Page 38 of 90
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.