Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Carmel Reid - MCU18/0019
he NOOSA COUNCIL Ee _ Notice of Submission
| SS
To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that: | eee OT SF ]
| 1. be made to the assessment manager | De ie, |
2 be in writing | apt 20g
| 3. be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically /
_ 4. state the name and residential or business address of each person who Tiade the. submission
5. state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why ir if
S._be received by Council during the formal public notification period
As required by the Planning Act 2016, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website
and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whetherenn
they are properly made.
1. Application details
File No. MCU18 / 0019
"Full name of Submitter Carrel Reid
Postaladdress 1/1 BoTHEBRUSN AVE "pics de
Suburb _ Noosa State aus Postcode 496¢
Signature(s)
(We), make the following submission: See eee een
1. | object to the proposed development because it will impact on the amenity of the surrounding neighbourhood which is
Zoned Detached housing. The size and bulk of the proposed development (which is basically one continuous bullding
taking up 11 lots) will ook totally out of place on the site which is surrounded by modest residential houses.
2. The residential character of the area will be substantially diminished in nature as a result of the development.
3. This site is currently zoned Detached Housing. Having a 90 bed aged care facllity on this site is in direct conflict with
the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan was drafted based on extensive community consultation. The community expects that
the Council adheres to the Plan and does not allow development which blatantly contravenes it, such as the proposed
development. Development that would be consistent with the planning scheme would be 11 dwellings over the 11 lots,
| Which is very different to a 90 bed aged care facility, which is commercial in nature.
4. A 90 bed aged care facility is excessive ahd is an overdevelopment of the site.
5. | understand that the Sunshine Coast will need more aged care facilities in the future, however, they should be located
in more appropriately zoned areas. Val Crescent is not an appropriate site for such a development. :
8. The section of Goodchap Street near the hospital and Val Crescent are already under a lot of strain in terms of car
parking, with them being used as an overflow car park for hospital staff, patients and visitors. A 90 bed facility directly
across the road from the hospital which has up to 35 staff, visitors and commercial vehicles will exacerbate this problem
with more and more people parking on Goodchap St, Val Crescent and nearby side streets.
Eexi31is°° Bs
Privacy
-P aw
Council will use any personal information provided for the intended purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect
this information in accordance with the Local Goverment Act 2009 and other Local GovernmentActs. Your personal Information ts only accessed by
persons authorised to do so, Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council's regs
Www.noosa.gid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 6329 6500
PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4665 ABN 97 969 214 121
Page 1 of 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission Object - Carmel Reid - MCU18/0019Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 331 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.