Council archive · source document
Development Application Part 2 of 2 Planning report Geotechnical report and plans MCU11/0168 & OPW11/0257
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (12.5 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
GeoConsulting, Report #15988. July 1 1 Page 9
Lot 34 Marcus Dues Court. Marcus Beach
Areas initially of moderate or high risk level to property may be accepted for development subject to
detailed investigation to define hazards, provided that planning and treatment options are implemented
to reduce risks to acceptable levels.
Acceptable Risk - Risks which everyone affected is prepared to accept. Action to further reduce
such risk is usually not required unless reasonably practicable measures are available at low cost
in terms of money, time and effort.
r
Low to moderate risk levels are usually considered acceptable to regulators provided that the
development of the site be carried out in accordance with good engineering practice for hillside
developments and with the subsequent Section 6 of this report. r
6.0 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Good Engineering Practice
r
Attached as APPENDIX B, are extracts from Practice Notes £t Guidelines for Landslide Risk
Management, (AGC (2007c)), including: -
♦ "Some Guidelines for Hillside Construction"
♦ "Examples of Good Hillside Practice"
Recommendations and guidelines have been related to this allotment below.
6.2 Site Clearing
Only clear the site where required for construction of the proposed residence, and retain as much of the
natural vegetation as possible. Original dunal vegetation has been removed. It is envisaged the site will
be stripped within the construction envelope. Species should conform to the Foundation Maintenance
and Footing Performance: A Homeowner's Guide, (CS1RO 2003), a copy of which is attached as
APPENDIX C.
6.3 Earthworks
6.3.1 General Earthworks
Some moderate earthworks (approximately 2900mm cut) will be required in order to create a level
basement platform, (RL99.5 as specified on the architectural plans). The following details should be
considered:
♦
♦
Earthworks should be prepared in accordance with the guidelines of AS 3798.
A positive drainage gradient is to be maintained over the building areas.
t
♦ Spoon drains to be installed at the toe of cut embankments
♦ Fill batters should grade at not less than 1:3 (V:H).
♦ Cut batters that are not retained should grade at not less than 1:5 (V:H).
♦ Exposed surfaces should be vegetated to reduce the opportunity for runoff scour
The proposed building area is to be stripped of all organic material.
I
Office at: 1/8 Derma St. Maroochydore, Q, 4558.
Phone: 5443 6622, Fax: 5479 1899, Email: adminQyeoconsultiny.cnm.au
e
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application Part 2 of 2 Planning report Geotechnical report and plans MCU11/0168 & OPW11/0257Related documentApplication case desk ↗
Development Application Part 2 of 2 Planning report Geotechnical report and plans MCU11/0168 & OPW11/0257Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 12.5 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.