Council archive · source document
App3 - DILGP Pre-lodgement Written Advice · OPW17/0024
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application 2 of 2 OPW17/0024.
Our reference: SPL-1216-035751 Your reference: 1901 13 January 2017 Osco Finance Pty Ltd C/- Martoo Consulting PO Box 1684 NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567 Attention: Greg Martoo Dear Mr Martoo Pre-lodgement Written Advice Proposed Operational Works for Prescribed Tidal Works 9 Cardell Road, Tewantin QLD 4565 (Lot 20 on CP907535) Thank you for your correspondence received on 12 December 2016 in which you sought pre-lodgement advice from the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning (the department) regarding the proposed development described above. The department has undertaken a preliminary assessment of the proposal and its impact. Based on your written correspondence, the following advice is provided: Reference information Departmental role: Concurrence agency Jurisdiction: Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 13—Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 15—Tidal works, or development in a coastal management district Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 25—Works or other development in a fish habitat area Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 26— Works or other development in a fish habitat area Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 30—Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants Page 1 SEQ North Region Level 3, Mike Ahern Building 12 First Avenue PO Box 1129 Maroochydore QLD 4558
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 6 pages
Page 2
SPL-1216-035751
Site details
Street address: 9 Cardell Road, Tewantin QLD 4565
Real property description: Lot 20 on CP907535
Site area: 1,127m²
Local government area: Noosa Shire Council
Existing use: Jetty and Marine Facilities
Relevant site history: Lease initially issued in 1951 for marine type facilities. A
new term lease of 30 years was issued to current lessee in
2015 with requires as part of the terms and conditions of the
new lease to conduct upgrades to the structure on site.
Proposed development details
Development type: Operational work
Development description: Prescribed Tidal Works – Alterations and additions to
existing jetty
Supporting information
Version and
Plan / Report title Author Reference no.
date
Site Plan large Natani Design A001 Rev. A
07/11/2016
Site Plan Natani Design A002 Rev. A
07/11/2016
Site Plan Demo Natani Design A003 Rev. A
07/11/2016
Set Out Plan Natani Design A101 Rev. A
07/11/2016
Office Floor Plan and Natani Design A201 Rev A
Elevations 12/12/2016
Store Plans and Natani Design A202 Rev A
Elevations 12/12/2016
The following advice outlines the matters of interest to the department and matters that
should be addressed if you proceed with your proposal to application stage.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.2
Page 3
SPL-1216-035751
Pre-lodgement Advice
Item Discussion and advice
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF)
Removal, destruction or damage of marine plants
1. The proposed works occur within the tidal reaches of the Noosa River, therefore it
is possible that the proposed works will involve the removal, destruction or damage
of marine plants.
Marine plants include:
any plant (a tidal plant (including marine algae) that usually grows on or
adjacent to tidal lands whether it is living, dead, standing or fallen; or
any plant material on tidal land (up to the level of Highest Astronomical Tide
(HAT))
Plants such as mangroves, mangrove fern, saltcouch or samphire species are
considered marine plants regardless of whether or not they are above or below the
level of HAT.
Marine plants do not include:
a plant that is prohibited matter or restricted matter under the Biosecurity
Act 2014; or
a plant that is controlled biosecurity matter or regulated biosecurity matter
under the Biosecurity Act 2014
Marine plant protection applies irrespective of the tenure (e.g. unallocated state
land and all state tenured lands, including private freehold and leasehold lands) of
the land on which the plant occurs, the time the plant has been growing at the
location, or the degree of or purpose of the disturbance.
2. Any works involving the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants must be
undertaken in accordance with one of the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
(DAF’s) self-assessable codes
(https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/fisheries/habitats/fisheries-development/self-
assessable-codes) or under a development approval.
The proposed works appear not to meet the requirements of any of DAF’s self-
assessable codes and therefore may require a development approval.
If possible, avoiding marine plant disturbance would remove the need for an
approval and potential fees for this component of the works.
3. The applicant will need to provide the following in an application for a development
approval:
IDAS forms 1 and 26, and all mandatory supporting information as stated in
the forms;
A full response to the relevant sections of the State Development
Assessment Provisions (SDAP), Module 5.3 Removal, destruction or
damage of marine plants state code;
The total amount of marine plants that will be disturbed, identifying portion
of permanent and/or temporary disturbance (in square meters or hectares);
A plan clearly showing the location of the marine plants to be disturbed in
relation to the development works;
The location of Highest Astronomical Tide (HAT);
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.3
Page 4
SPL-1216-035751
Item Discussion and advice
If applicable, a plan clearly showing the location of the marine plants to be
disturbed that will result in a Significant Residual Impact as defined under the
Environmental Offsets Act 2014.
4. Should the works involve the removal, destruction or damage or marine plants, the
applicant must demonstrate compliance with the SDAP, Module 5.3. The applicant
should pay particular attention to the following Performance Outcomes (PO’s):
PO3 - There is an overriding functional requirement for the development or
part of the development to be located on tidal lands;
o Marina offices do not depend on their location to be on or over tidal
lands to function. Alternatives of lesser impact exist.
PO8 - Development of, or adjacent to, fish habitats avoids the unnecessary
loss, degradation or fragmentation of fish habitats and their values and the
loss of fish movement.
PO17 - Works for dredging or extracting sediment for private infrastructure
are only undertaken where there is an overriding public need exists for the
work.
PO20 - Maritime infrastructure providing for private access avoids impacts
on marine plants and fish habitat.
PO25 - Impacts to marine plants or legally secured offset areas for marine
plants are avoided or mitigated, and an environmental offset is provided for
any significant residual impact.
5. In accordance with PO25 of the SDAP Module 5.3, the department maintains an
‘avoid, mitigate, offset’ requirement that applies to those activities that will, or are
likely to, have a significant residual impact on prescribed environmental matters.
Depending on the type of works being proposed and the amount of marine plants
to be disturbed, the works may have a Significant Residual Impact.
The applicant will need to provide details on how the impacts to fish resources will
be avoided or minimised and where this cannot be reasonably achieved, offset
(see DILGP’s Environmental offsets and the planning framework factsheets and
guidelines for further details).
Development completely or partly within a declared Fish Habitat Area
6. Lot 20 on CP907535 immediately adjoins the Noosa River declared Fish Habitat
Area (FHA), management A area. Management A areas are the strictest
management level for declared FHAs.
Development within a declared FHA must be conducted in accordance with one of
the DAF’s self-assessable codes, or under a development approval. Should the
applicant be proposing works (temporary or permanent) within the declared FHA it
is advised that the applicant review DAF’s self-assessable codes (particularly
MP02 and or MP06) to determine if works can meet the requirements. If not, a
development approval is required.
7. If any works occur in the declared FHA and require a development approval, a
Resource Allocation Authority (RAA) will also be required under the Fisheries Act
1994.
RAAs authorise interference with a declared FHA, as required under section 76A
of the Fisheries Act 1994.
Section 215 of the Fisheries Regulation 2008 broadly outlines the restrictions on
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.4
Page 5
SPL-1216-035751
Item Discussion and advice
the issue of RAAs and the matters that must be taken into account in deciding an
application:
An RAA may only be issued in a declared FHA for a prescribed
development purpose specified in section 214 of the Fisheries Regulation
2008.
Regard must be had to the effect of the development proposal on
maintenance of:
o community use of the area (particularly fishing activities);
o the effect of the development on the maintenance of the natural
condition of fish habitats and natural processes in the area within a
management A area;
o the effect of the development on current fish habitat values and
functions of a management B area.
Further information on RAA’s and the relevant application forms can be found at
https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/fisheries/habitats/fisheries-development/making-an-
application.
Avoiding the FHA would remove the need for the aforementioned approvals and
potential fees for this component of the works.
8. As per PO2 of the SDAP Module 5.1, for works to be supported within a declared
FHA, the proposed works need to meet one of the prescribed development
purposes specified in section 214 of the Fisheries Regulation 2008
It is advised that the applicant review Operational Policy: Management of declared
Fish Habitat Areas to determine what prescribed development purpose any
proposed works in the declared FHA would meet.
9. An application for development approval for works completely or partly within a
declared FHA must include the following information:
IDAS forms 1 and 26, and all the mandatory supporting information as
stated in the forms;
A full response to the relevant section of the SDAP, Module 5.1
Development in a declared Fish Habitat Area state code.
Department of Environment and Heritage Protection
10. The proposed works may be able to be carried out under the Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection’s Excluded Works (Coastal) Guideline under
Schedule 26 Item 2. It is recommended that the applicant read the relevant
sections of the guideline to determine if the proposed development meets the
exclusion and is compliant with the conditions and restrictions imposed by the
Excluded Works Framework.
The Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Excluded Works (Coastal)
Guideline can be found at: https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/coastal/development/pdf/gl-
excluded-works-em2734.pdf.
EHP can also provide advice as to whether proposed works is able to be carried
out under this Excluded Works (Coastal) Guideline.
11. If the proposed works do not satisfy the criteria required by the Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection’s Excluded Works (Coastal) Guideline under
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.5
Page 6
SPL-1216-035751
Item Discussion and advice
Schedule 26 Item 2, ‘for construction’ plans certified by a registered RPEQ will
need to be provided, which outline the proposed development in relation to the
following:
real property boundaries
the high water mark (mean high water spring)
the coastal management district
the erosion prone area and/or coastal hazard area
any areas of ecological significance
12. The trigger for ERA 16 (dredging) is 1000t/year. If the proposed development is not
removing over 1000t/year of material below the high water mark, an approval for
dredging will not be required. Minor benthic disturbance will be assessed as part of
the tidal works assessment.
Department of Natural Resources and Mines (State Land Assessment Management
(SLAM))
13. From the drawings provided, it appears the proposal wouldn’t contravene the
purpose or conditions of existing lease TL238411, over Lot 20/CP907535. However
all works to be carried out would be subject to compliance of the conditions of the
lease which does include development and use of the land meeting with Planning
Scheme, Local Laws and requirements of the Noosa Shire Council.
Department of Transport and Main Roads (Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ))
14. The proposed works involves prescribed tidal works which requires referral under
Schedule 7, Table 2, Item 15 of SPR.
Any development application made is to provide a response to the latest version of
the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) Module 14–Maritime
safety, identifying how the proposed development meets each performance
outcome by addressing all applicable acceptable outcomes.
The application will need to provide the following details –
The maximum size of vessel associated with each berth. Length, Beam,
Displacement.
Confirm the lighting will be placed on the structure to ensure visibility by
mariners.
Construction methodology if marine civil plant is to be used.
If the marina is to hold six (6) vessels or more, the application should
demonstrate what arrangements will be made for management of sewage
under Policy 6 of the State interest guideline – Coastal environment – April
2006 and Appendix 2 – SPP code: Ship-source pollutants reception
facilities in marinas of the State Planning Policy.
Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.6
Page 7
SPL-1216-035751 If you require any further information, please contact Candace Mitchell, Senior Planning Officer, on 5352 9708 who will be pleased to assist. Yours sincerely Garth Nolan Manager (Planning) Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning Page.7
Used in these records
App3 - DILGP Pre-lodgement Written Advice.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 169 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.