Council archive · source document
ASTP-Resp_To_IR · OPW22/0204
Our ref: 211221
Council Ref: OPW22/0204
31 August 2022
The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
Tewantin QLD 4565
Attention: Development Assessment – Daniel Epps
Via Email: [email protected]
Dear Daniel,
Re: Response to Council’s Information Request
Development Permit for Operational Works (Civil Engineering and Stormwater)
54 Ward Street, TEWANTIN
Lot 10 RP 28718
Council ref: OPW22/0204
I refer to Council’s Information Request, dated 24 August 2022 in relation to the abovementioned development.
On behalf of the applicant, Abbey & Rick Anderson, and in accordance with Part 3(13) of the DA Rules 2017, we
provide a response to all the issues raised. A response to the item(s) raised in Councils Information Request is
outlined below:
ITEM 1:
Provide additional detail demonstrating that the proposed grate will be constructed with a
Class D bike safe grate.
RESPONSE
Please refer to Amended Civil Engineering Plans prepared by ARCOS (Attachment 1), as detailed the new grate
to be installed is to be ‘Class D bike safe’ and delivered in accordance with Council standards.
ITEM 2:
Provide additional detail on the access driveway and areas of verge. The detail must be
prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of
Queensland) and include, but not be limited to:
a. levels and grades of the driveway;
b. demonstrate that a B99 vehicle will not scrape or bottom out while entering or
exiting the driveway; and
c. demonstrate how trip hazards will be eliminated within the road reserve by
indicating the full extent of the transition to the adjoining areas of verge.
Page 1 of 2
Our ref: 211221
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
RESPONSE
Please refer to accompanying Amended Civil Engineering Plans prepared by ARCOS (Attachment 1), which
provide additional detail in regard to driveway grades and transitions. ARCOS have detailed that ‘We have also
checked that a B99 vehicle can enter and exit satisfactorily’.
Based on the amended design and feedback from ARCOS, it is understood that the design of the development
satisfies the requirements of Information Request Items 2.
This represents our complete response to the Information Request issued by Council, and we look forward to
the Decision Notice being issued in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Planning Act 2016.
As always, please feel free to contact me direct should you require any additional information or clarification.
Yours faithfully,
ADAMS + SPARKES
Michael Lyell
SENIOR TOWN PLANNER
Encl: Amended Civil Engineering Plans prepared by ARCOS (Attachment 1)
Page 2 of 2
Our ref: 211221
Used in these records
ASTP-Resp_To_IR.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 305 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.