Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 - Notice of Submission - James Malcolm
:
4. Confirm that lhe follo-.'ing mandatoI)' supporting information accompanies this application
MandlllOI)' supporting informlllion Conlltmadoo ot Method of
lodgement lodgement
All applications
Aoile plan drawn 10 an appropriale """Ie (1:100, 1:200 or 1:500 are [;}c<.nftnned
recommend.d scales) which ohO'Ws the fOlOwing:
• Ihe location and sne area of lbe lund to which the appli""""" rell11es
(relevant lanrJ)
• tMnMhpolnl
• the bouooaries of the relevant land
• any road frontages or the relevant land, including Ille name ofthe road
• lhe location and use ol any existing or proposad buildings or swetures
on Ille relevant land (note: where exterr.;lve demoliUon Of new buildings
are proposed. """ separale pions [an existing oile plan and Jll1lllOS<ld site
p1anJmay be approfWiate)
• any existing C>r proposec casemonls on ma relevanlland and lheir
luOCUon
• the locelion and use 0' buildings on land adjoining lhe relevanlland
• all vehicle access points and any existing or proposed car parldng areas
on the relevant land. Car parking spaces tor persons with disabllities and
any sorvlce vehicle a.xes. and parking should be clearly ma!t<ed
• lor any new building on lho relavant land. Illelocatloo at refuse slorago I
• the locallon of any proposed retairing wallS 00 the relevant land and th.lr
height .
.
I
• the 'ocatlon of any proposed landscaping on tho rel!vant land
• the location 01 any stormwater delentiQn on the relevant land .
I
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the onsite parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involves new operational work
Plans showing tne ""ture, location. number of""" o•••••t. car paridlig bays, .ITConfinned
p""",sea area 01 new landscaping, proposed type 01new vehicle cross-over
(no<Hesidootlal usas), proposec maximum new vehlwlar se<Viting
o No( app!1ca1R
all'angement (non-resldentJal uses) oft1le proposed new operational worl:.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor materiai submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint proposed of 3.6m x 204m to approx,
7.5m x 5.4m (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 - Notice of Submission - James MalcolmRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.