2022-01-17 General Committee Meeting Agenda

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                17 JANUARY 2022


           6.3. the applicant has not demonstrated that some buildings will be sufficiently
                screened from Council’s major road network;
           6.4. building 4 exceeds the maximum building height for the area and has a reduced
                building setback from Hofmann Drive; and
           6.5. pedestrian connectivity and access is poor.
     7.    The proposal does not satisfy Specific Outcome O28 of the Landscaping Code and
           O17 of the Driveway and Carparking Code as the car parking area is deficient in
           landscaping with unsatisfactory provision for shade trees.
     8.    The proposal is significantly deficient in car parking and does not comply with Specific
           Outcome O7 of the Noosa Plan’s Driveways and Car parking Code.
     9.    The applicant has not satisfactorily demonstrated that the development will not
           adversely impact on the external traffic network contrary to Overall Outcomes tt) ix of
           the Noosaville Locality Code and 14.142.2 a) of the Transport, Roads and Drainage
           Code.
     10.   The applicant has not demonstrated that stormwater management can be successfully
           and appropriately integrated into the current development layout consistent with
           14.157.2 of the Water Sensitive Design Code and Specific Outcome O8 of the
           Transport, Roads and Drainage Code.
     11.   The proposal includes clearing of significant vegetation as part of the proposed
           measures for stormwater management contrary to the purpose of current
           environmental covenants registered over the site and the Noosaville Locality Code
           requirements for Precinct OS3 Specific Outcomes O218 to O222 and Precinct OS6
           Specific Outcomes O224 & O225.
     12.   The proposal does not comply with the draft Noosa Plan as:
           12.1. the quantum of retail proposed is not envisaged on the site and does not advance
                 nor assist in preparing for a transitioning or changing economy contrary to
                 Strategic Intent 3.2.6 - A diverse and resilient economy and Strategic Outcomes
                 3.3.5(r) and (s)(i)(B);
           12.2. the proposal is not contributing to the key priority sectors identified in Strategic
                 Intent 3.2.6;
           12.3. the proposal does not comply with PO1 of the Transport Code and PO6 of the
                 Driveways and Parking Code as carparking is grossly deficient and the applicant
                 has not demonstrated there will not be adverse effects on the surrounding traffic
                 network;
           12.4. the development does not comply with Overall Outcomes 6.4.1.2 (3)(c) (iii) & 3(f)
                 of the Major Centre Zone Code as it does not reflect appropriate subtropical
                 design and is not distinctively recognisable as being Noosa Style; and
           12.5. the stormwater management of the site does not comply with the Water Quality
                 and Drainage Code Outcomes PO7 and PO11.
     13.   There is no significant need for the proposed retail and the proposal fails to advance
           the priority sectors envisaged by Noosa’s Local Economic Plan.
     14.   The proposed uses are clearly defined by The Noosa Plan and the applicant’s
           proposed use definitions are unnecessary, inappropriate and have the potential to
           cause confusion.
     15.   There are no discretionary matters which would warrant approval of the development
           proposal.
     16.   For the aforesaid reasons, approval of the development proposal would not advance
           the purpose of the Planning Act 2016.
B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
                                                                                     Page 29 of 72