Council archive · source document
Martoo Planning statement · 132006.1395.04
Attached to the e-mail 132006.1395.04 Request for Extension of Relevant Period.
Page 2
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS:
In accordance with Section 388 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, in deciding a request to extend
the relevant period, the assessment manager must only have regard to:
a) the consistency of the approval, including its conditions, with the current laws and policies
applying to the development, including, for example, the amount and type of infrastructure
contributions, or charges payable under chapter 8, parts 2 and 3; and
(b) the community’s current awareness of the development approval; and
(c) whether, if the request were refused—
(i) further rights to make a submission may be available for a further development application;
and
(ii) the likely extent to which those rights may be exercised; and
(d) the views of any concurrence agency for the approval given under section 385.
ASSESSMENT:
The current development approval was assessed and granted under the superseded planning scheme
prior to the current Noosa Plan. The proposal was reviewed against the 2006 Noosa Plan provisions
under the previous application for extension of the relevant period, wherein it was determined that the
core values of the site including environmental and density provisions were met. A comparison of the
proposal against the current planning scheme is detailed below:
2006 Noosa Plan Proposal Complies
Population density - 100persons/ha = 40.54persons 33 persons
Semi Attached Housing zone area of 3818.5m2 plus road area of
236m2 (based on original deed between Council to include area of
road transferred to Council in calculations)Total 4054.5m2 = 40.54
persons
Gross Floor Area – 40.54 persons x 40m2 = 1621.6m2 1896m2 x
Site cover - 40% complies
Landscaping - 1m2 1320m2
60% soft landscaping complies
Roof form - 5 degree minimum pitch Complies
and 600 mm eaves
Conditions included in approval
Eaves provided for 75% perimeter of building Complies
Conditions on approval
Boundary setbacks
• Frontage -6.0m • Frontage – 6.0m
• Side - half building height • complies
• Side – half building height • complies
• Rear – 6.0m • Rear– complies
Conditions included in approval
Building Height
• in storeys - 2 storeys max • in storeys - 2 storeys
• in metres - 8 metres max • in metres - 8.0 metres max
Length of wall
• 15 metres with one design element • complies
• variation in roof forms • variation in roof forms
• segmented balconies • segmented balconies
• no more than 4 attached dwelling units • complies
Carparking - 1 covered space per dwelling unit and 1 space for 20 covered spaces
visitor parking 4 uncovered
As indicated above the proposal generally complies with the current provisions of the Noosa Plan apart
from gross floor area. It is noted that the existing approval is for 10 units which is actually less than the
12 units that could be developed on site. The slight increase in gross floor area is considered to meet
the Specific Outcome which indicates development:
a) results in a building scale that is compatible with surrounding development;
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Martoo Planning statement.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 355 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.