Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Johann Holdysz - MCU25/0118
Housing propos By Johann Holdysz The affordable housing proposal at 64 Lake Mac- donald Drive, Cooroy is back on the agenda. For many Cooroy residents — particularly those in Dianella Court and Viola Place who pre- viously lodged complaints, petitions and submis- sions — this is another opportunity to make their voices heard. Formal submissions on the current Planning Application MCU25/0118 (for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use to establish 25 small dwellings as Affordable Rental Premises) may be made until 24 November 2025. Council’s Decision to Use Cemetery Land In its search for land “surplus to Council needs,” the Noosa Council identified the former rubbish- dump site next to the Cooroy Cemetery — previ- ously earmarked for cemetery expansion purposes as a candidate for affordable housing. That deci- sion is questionable. The cemetery is already near- ing full operational capacity, and there is no clear evidence that the need for future burial space, or for alternative community uses such as open space or recreation, was properly considered before de- claring the land “surplus.” Distance and Access Problems Community concerns have focused strongly on the site's isolation from shops, services and public transport. Councillor Nicola Wilson noted that the site is far from essential services and that it would be difficult and potentially unsafe for vulnerable residents to walk either up Kauri Street's steep slope or along Lake Macdonald Drive, which lacks footpaths. Councillor Jessica Phillips emphasise that housing developments should be carefully lo- cated, appropriately scaled, and should not under- mine community amenity or impose hidden costs on ratepayers. The site lies roughly 1.3 kilometres walking dis- tance (or about 1.16 km “as the crow flies”) from the Cooroy shopping centre — too far for com- fortable access on foot, especially for elderly or mobility-restricted tenants. The nearest bus stop, on the Cooroy-Tewantin Road near Olivene Street, is about 830 metre: hable only via Pear Tree Lane —with a creek crossing that floods, a Johann Holdysz. (Supplied) rough hill climb, a lack of footpaths, and is obvi- ously not a community safe place. Why Location Matters Modern affordable-housing principles favour sites within easy reach of shops, community services and reliable public transport — ideally within 400- 1000 metres of high-frequency bus or train servic- es operating at least every 15 minutes in peak pe- riods. Cooroy simply does not have such transport services. On access grounds alone, this proposal should have been rejected outright. Developer's Response In its planning report for Coast2Bay Housing Drive, Cooroy is prepared for housing development. Land clearing for affordable housing proposal at 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy. Group, consultants RPS Group argued that the site is “close to key services offered within the Cooroy Town Centre” and that tenancy allocation would “favour those with high transportation needs, given the proximity to Cooroy train station and bus services along Tewantin Road.” However, lo- cal residents and councillors strongly dispute that description of “proximity”. Density, Amenity and Infrastructure Councillor Phillips and the community have also raised concerns about the excessive density and intensity of the development, its impact on Co- oroy’s limited infrastructure (roads, intersections, noosatopay.comau NEWS a fiasco parking), and the loss of valued open green space intended for cemetery expansion. Councillor Phillips supports working collab- oratively with the State on affordable housing — but only when developments are well-planned, balanced, and located where they make sense, not simply “forced through because of urgency or political pressure.’ Councillor Wilson summed up community frustration in February s fol- lows: - “It’s too late to consult with the community about how to use the land when we've already taken steps to remediate it; we've jumped the gun and built a road.” Poor Planning and Misplaced Priorities Council’s rushed move to rezone and push afford- able housing on this site appears to be planning by opportunity, not by design. It was followed by a $4.1 million grant for essential infrastructure from the Crisafulli Government — money that could arguably have been spent on a site closer to town, free of contamination issues, and better served by infrastructure. Choosing this location has sacri ficed trees, added unnecessary costs, and reduced space for future cemetery needs. Unresolved Concerns Key issues that remain unresolved include: 1, The site's distance from public transport, shops and essential services. . The social and psychological impact of isolating vulnerable tenants without adequate access to amenities, The developments incompatibility and exces- sive density, more akin to townhouses or unit complexes than the with surrounding single- dwelling character. 4. The risk of setting a precedent for similar high- density developments on adjoining Lots 2 & 3, and the surrounding area. Conclusion Cooroy residents have long supported the prin- ciple of affordable housing — but they also expect it to be planned responsibly, located sensibly, and integrated thoughtfully into the town’s existing character and infrastructure. The proposal for 64 Lake Macdonald Drive fails those basic tests. nD * Sell your broken or unwanted Jewellery in 3 easy steps: 1 We Verify 2. We Weigh 3. We Pay GUARANTEED HIGHEST PRICES PAID tr OOSA 5/19 SUNSHINE BEACH ROAD, NOOSA HEADS QLD 4567 [email protected] | 1300 888 787 GOLD BUYERS Document Set ID: 24325570 Version: 1, Version Date: 21/11/2025 a er, 2025 NOOSA TODAY 14
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Johann Holdysz - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 916 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.