Council archive · source document
MCU250042 - Response to Information Request · MCU25/0042
In response to the clarification on building height. The following building height blanket drawings illustrate the
south-western roof edge/eave exceeds the 8.0 metre blanket by 100mm. This intrusion is of a very minor nature
and given the over height only relates to the roof edge/eave it would not be material impact on any surrounding
properties.
We seek a relaxation to this item for the following reasons;
a) The encroachment is minor (100mm maximum). The part of roof that encroaches slopes with (not
against) the blanket overlay and does not adversely impact any neighbouring views/view-lines;
b) The area of intrusion does not visually dominate the street or the surrounding lots;
c) The area of intrusion will not unreasonably obscure views or lead to overshadowing of the neighbouring
properties.
d) The southern boundary (the side which includes the encroachment) is setback 8.5 metres from the side
boundary, therefore confirming there is no material impact on this property by the minor height
intrusion.
Based on the above, amended drawings have been provided to include the building height blanket.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU250042 - Response to Information Request.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 4.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.