Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

10.0 Effluent Disposal Report Shed Site

of 11

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                                            QBCC Licence No.1018403

            THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS                 UNIT 3/53 GATEWAY DR, NOOSAVILLE , 4566

                                   Ph.0754740900/ Fax.0754740901/ email: [email protected]

JOB NUMBER    20/0609 -C    EFFLUENT DISPOSAL REPORT
CLIENT        DAVID ROGALSKY
SITE LOCATION PROPOSED SHED,
              142 PLAYFORD ROAD, KIN KIN.
REPORT DATE   14/08/2020



1.   INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this report is to evaluate and define a suitable on-site sewerage treatment and
     disposal system for household effluents in accordance with Australian Standard 1547 -
     2012“On-site domestic-wastewater management”. The Qld Plumbing & Wastewater Code has
     been used for reference purposes during the compiling of this report.

     This report relates exclusively to the proposed Shed at 142 Playford Road, Kin Kin. This
     document has been prepared for the express purpose stated above. This document does not
     cover any other elements related to construction on the site.


2.   SITE DESCRIPTION AND WEATHER CONDITIONS

     The site is an acreage allotment, which fronts a sealed road.
     The slope configuration in relation to surface drainage is linear planar.
     The soil surface condition was moist at the time of testing. There was no evidence of cracking
     of the surface during the investigation.
     The site has no visible rock outcrops on the surface of the allotment.
     The proposed effluent disposal area is exposed to sun and wind.
     The proposed effluent disposal area is well grassed, with dense undergrowth, and has a dense
     growth of small to large sized mature trees present. The proposed effluent disposal area falls at a
     slope of approximately 13% towards the north. Surface water drainage from adjoining
     allotments will not traverse this site. Surface water from the tested area will drain towards the
     north.
     The weather conditions prior to testing were periods of moist conditions.
     The site has a Watercourse feeding a large Dam 15m downhill of the proposed effluent disposal
     area.

3.   SOIL PROFILE

     The borelogs carried out at the site, refer attached Site Plan for localities, indicate that the soil
     profile typically consists of a moist, grey/brown, low plasticity SANDY CLAY.
     Groundwater was not encountered during the field investigation.
     ROCK was encountered at a depth of 400mm during the field investigation.

     RESERVE AREA

     A 100% reserve effluent disposal area can be obtained on this allotment.
Log in to download the original file

10.0 Effluent Disposal Report Shed Site.pdf · 331 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 10 pages

Page 2

     Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the borelogs carried out at the subject allotment
     are indicative of the soil profile over the site any discrepancy between the profile detailed in the
     borelogs and that observed during construction shall be referred to Global Testing for
     immediate attention.

4.   INVESTIGATION DETAILS

     The investigation carried out at the site included hand augered boreholes up to 400mm depth
     and a series of three permeability test pits located as shown on the attached site report. All
     testing carried out was in accordance with Australian Standard 1547 - 2012 “On-site domestic-
     wastewater management”.


5.   TEST RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS (TABLE A1)
      Test No.  Soil           Slope Setback   Recommended                                  Beavers
                Permeability   (m/m) Distance Design Irrigation                             Gardner
                (based on test       (m)       Rate (mm/Day)                                Setback
                results)Ksat                   As per AS/NZS                                Distance
                                                 1547-2012
      PT 1           0.10
      PT 2                   0.11
      PT 3                   0.14
      Average                0.11           . 13          10*                3                  4m

     *Minimum setback distance from a watercourse (when an Advanced Secondary Eco-Safe
      Sand Filter is recommended) required by Noosa Council Policy.

     Determination of Soil Category (Table 5.1 of AS/NZS 1547:2012)
       Soil Category         Soil Texture          Structure         Indicative          Indicative
             BH8                                                    Permeability       Drainage class
                                                                    (ksat)(m/day)
              5               Light Clays          Moderately         0.06-0.12         Poorly Drain
         (00-500mm)                                Structured

     The Design Irrigation Rate of 3mm/week was adopted from the above results in Table A1.

     Noosa Council’s policy suggests that the use of a primary treated effluent disposal system
     will be satisfactory provided;
        # Sufficient permeable surface soil overlying rock is present over the disposal area, not
          less than 1.2metres depth.
        # A suitable soil category material (as per AS1547-2012) is encountered.
        # A Minimum set-back distance of 50m is obtained.
        # Permeability rates are within the required parameters.
     Not all the above requirements have been met, therefore it is concluded that the use of a
     primary treated effluent disposal system is not acceptable.


                                       Report 20/0609-C edr page2

Page 3

6.      RECOMMENDATIONS
         The Design Irrigation Rate of 3mm/day be adopted.
         The site be provided with an “Advanced Secondary Eco-Safe Sand Filter” capable of
          producing advanced secondary effluent, or an equivalent system, to councils approval
          in lieu of a septic tank.
         The disposal system be by, # A Covered surface drip irrigation system consisting of
          ‘Wasteflow or Netafim’ Pressure-Compensating Drippers, as per AS/NZS
          1547:2012.
         Purple line is to be used from the ASTP to the irrigation area.
         An in-line filter is to be installed between the Treatment Plant and the Irrigation System.
          Regular maintenance of the Filter shall be undertaken, according to manufacturers
          recommendation.
         An 150mm high diversion bank/border shall be constructed around the irrigated
          area.
         The dripper system shall evenly distribute effluent to avoid clogging by soil or root
          intrusion. Maximum spacing shall be 1000mm.
         Non-return valves and flush-out valves should be installed on irrigation lines. The
          minimum required amount of effluent to be pumped at regular intervals, should be such,
          that all irrigation lines are full, and effluent delivered equally.
         The Wasteflow/Netafim lines are to be placed on the surface, with a 150mm layer of
          mulch placed over the irrigation lines. Existing evergreen plants are to be utilized to
          maximize evapo-transpiration.
         The disposal area required is 80m2.
          This area has been calculated on a daily flow rate of 240 litres/day (2 people @120Lper
           person/ per day) and a design irrigation rate of 3mm/day.
          This flow rate will accommodate the proposed Shed only. A 100% reserve area (as
          per site plan) is to be kept free of buildings and traffic.
         The disposal area should be located in the vicinity of PT 1, PT 2 and PT 3 as per
          attached site plan.
         All set-back distances as required by the local authority shall be met;

        . Stormwater run-off including roof-water from buildings shall be diverted around and away
           from the disposal area. Imported fill may be required should there be insufficient soil
           available for the design of the disposal system.
Certification
The local authority may request that an inspection and certification is undertaken on the installation
of the system when nearing completion. The installer must contact Noosa Council prior to ‘burying’
the system, if certification is required.
          Please note: Personal Hygiene Products, Bleaches and detergents high in phosphorous will
          damage the capabilities of the Treatment System’s performance. Information should be
           sought by the Treatment System’s manufacturer for a guide of suitable products acceptable
           for the system.
Yours Sincerely,




Michael S. Pinkney (Laboratory Manager)
                                        Report 20/0609-C EDR-page3

Page 4

                      THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS



SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT:               David Rogalsky.                        AUTHORIZED                  Building Suncoast
                                                             BY:                         Green.
PROJECT:              142 Playford Road,                     DATE TESTED:                10/07/2020
                      Kin Kin.                               JOB NO:                     20/0609-C


                      Drilling Method: 100mm Hand Auger                                             Borehole
                                                                                                     No: 3
   Depth            Description                                                    PENET.          Comments
                                                                                  (blows per
   (mm)                                                                            100mm)
                                                                              1      2    3    4
       0            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff

     100
     200            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff
                    (Becoming Weathered Rock)
     300
     400            ROCK -Hand Auger Refusal.
     500
     600
     700
     800
     900
    1000
    1100
    1200
    1300
    1400
    1500
    1600
    1700
    1800
    1900
    2000
    2100
    2200
    2300
    2400
    2500
Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-1993 Site Investigation Code
                                                       20/0609-C edr Page 4

Page 5

                   THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS


SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT:               David Rogalsky.                        AUTHORIZED                  Building Suncoast
                                                             BY:                         Green.
PROJECT:              142 Playford Road,                     DATE TESTED:                10/07/2020
                      Kin Kin.                               JOB NO:                     20/0609-C

                      Drilling Method: 100mm Hand Auger                                             Borehole
                                                                                                     No: 4
   Depth            Description                                                    PENET.          Comments
                                                                                  (blows per
   (mm)                                                                            100mm)
                                                                              1      2    3    4
       0            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff

     100
     200            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff
                    (Becoming Weathered Rock)
     300
     400            ROCK -Hand Auger Refusal.
     500
     600
     700
     800
     900
    1000
    1100
    1200
    1300
    1400
    1500
    1600
    1700
    1800
    1900
    2000
    2100
    2200
    2300
    2400
    2500
Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-1993 Site Investigation Code
                                                       20/0609-C-edr Page 5

Page 6

                      THE ONLY NAME IN SOILS


SOIL PROFILE REPORT
CLIENT:               David Rogalsky                         AUTHORIZED                  Building Suncoast
                                                             BY:                         Green.
PROJECT:              142 Playford Road,                     DATE TESTED:                10/07/2020
                      Kin Kin.                               JOB NO:                     20/0609-C

                      Drilling Method: 100mm Hand Auger                                             Borehole
                                                                                                     No: 5
   Depth            Description                                                    PENET.          Comments
                                                                                  (blows per
   (mm)                                                                            100mm)
                                                                              1      2    3    4
       0            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff

     100
     200            SANDY CLAY (CL) Low plasticity,
                    grey/brown, fine to coarse sand, moist, stiff
                    (Becoming Weathered Rock)
     300
     400            ROCK -Hand Auger Refusal.
     500
     600
     700
     800
     900
    1000
    1100
    1200
    1300
    1400
    1500
    1600
    1700
    1800
    1900
    2000
    2100
    2200
    2300
    2400
    2500
Borelogging in accordance with AS1726-1993 Site Investigation Code
                                                       20/0609-C-edr Page 6

Page 7

* DO NOT Allow newspapers, disposable or sanitary napkins, rubber products,
         nappy liners, cotton buds etc. to enter the system.



* DO NOT Use an in-sink garbage grinder. These are not recommended by most
         councils as they can add extra loading equivalent to about 2 persons.



* DO NOT Use strong caustics, acids, alkalis or chemical detergents. These can
         damage the system and cause bad odours.




* DO NOT Use disinfectants or other bactericides.



* DO NOT Put grease/fats or food scraps down the kitchen sink i.e plates should be
         scraped resonably clean prior to washing up.


* NEVER       Dispose of used cooking oil or similar material down the sink.




                                    20/0609-C edr Page 7

Page 8

               LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL NOTES

1. A Site Classification Report may be requested by Certifiers or Local Council to aid in
   approval of this report regarding articulation, if the site is suspected of being classified as H,
   E or P in accordance with AS2870. Global Testing should be contacted to undertake this
   testing (additional charge applies), if not previously requested. This Effluent Disposal
   Report does not address articulation or flexible joints (an RPEQ should be sought if design
   of either of these is required- additional charges apply).
2. If any future amendments are required due to the movement of the building footprint,
   amount of bedrooms, on-site earthworks, or requests for an alternative area or alternative
   system, an additional charge of $330 will apply to complete an updated Effluent Disposal
   Report.
3. Global Testing has completed this report based on plans and information as supplied by the
   client.
4. Any levels or slope measurements within this report are approximate only, and should not be
   used for construction purposes.




                                        20/0609-C edr Page 8

Page 9

                    Covered Pegged Surface Drip Irrigation System
                             Utilize existing plants
150mm cover of mulch                                 1000mm max. Spacing


Ground Level




                                  Netafim or Wasteflow Pressure Compensating Dripper Lines
                                             Place on surface and cover with 150mm mulch.

150mm high mound surround




                       Diversion drain
                                         or Cut off drain         Irrigation lines




                       Slope greater than 15%

                                  Typical Plan Layout of Manifold and Laterals for an
Netafim or                                   Irrigation Area of 80m2
Wasteflow Pressure
Compensating Dripper
Lines
                                                            1m
To Advanced Secondary
Eco-Safe Sand Filter

                        8m




          Flush-out Valves                                  10m

Page 10

Page 11

     Job No: 20/0609-C Date Tested: 10/07/2020          Site : 142 Playford Rd, Kin Kin (Shed) Client : David Rogalsky   SCALE 1.500




                                                   Proposed Advanced Secondary Eco-Safe
                                                   Sand Filter with Large Capacity Pump
                                                   (To be installed)
                             Survey Pegged #9014


Proposed pressure-compensating Covered                            Fill Batter
Surface Drip Irrigation Area - 80m2
(Wasteflow or Netafim to be used)
(To be mulched, utilize existing plants,                                                  Proposed
border and install)                                                                       Shed
                                                                                          On Level Cut/
                                                     BH2                                  Fill Platform
                                                                    BH1
                                                     PN2            PN1
                     15m                     20m

                                      BH3
                            10m       PT1                                       2m Cut
                   BH5
                   PT3                                      30% Slope
           13%                             BH4
           Slope    8m                     PT2

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.