Council archive · source document
PR25042.Minor Change.12Oct2026 · OPW22/0140.02
Our Ref: PR25042 E-mail: [email protected]
Mobile: 0430 011 617
Date: 12 October 2026
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
Tewantin QLD 4565
Dear Sir/Madam,
RE: APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 78 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2016
37 BOTTLEBRUSH AVE, NOOSA HEADS FORMALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 133 RP88934
MCU22/0087.01 & OPW22/0140.01
We act on behalf of S & J Knobel P/L Tte in relation to the development approval for 37 Bottlebrush
Avenue, Noosa Heads, originally granted on 21 July 2023 and subsequently changed on 18 November
2025. This application seeks approval to revise the pedestrian entry to Unit 3 and amend Conditions 13
and 23 concerning external finishes and waste facilities.
The existing approval comprises:
- Development Permit for Material Change of Use – Multiple dwelling (3 units); and
- Development Permit for Operational Works – drainage works, landscaping, stormwater
and earthworks.
INTRODUCTION
This change application is made under section 78 of the Planning Act 2016, with Noosa Shire Council as
the responsible entity. The approved use and number of dwellings are retained. The changes arise from
detailed design and seek to improve pedestrian access and clarify the delivery of building finishes and
location of bin storage areas.
The land subject of this application has been approved for a Multiple Dwelling use pursuant to Noosa Shire
Council Development Permit reference MCU22/0087.01 & OPW22/0140.01.
Further to the receipt of Council’s most recent change approval dated 18 November 2025, the Applicant
has completed the detailed design phase and identified a range of minor variations to the attached
architectural plans. The proposed variations result in a more efficient and functional residential outcome
and are therefore considered supportable, though triggers the need for Council’s assessment as a Minor
Change application.
In addition to minor design variations accommodated within the attached Architectural Plans, the Applicant
has identified a limited number of development conditions requiring amendment for clarity and to improve
the overall administration of the approval.
Page 1 of 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 6 pages
Page 2
MINOR CHANGE ASSESSMENT
The proposal is assessed against the definition of minor change in Schedule 2 of the Act and the
considerations in Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules. On the scope described:
- The same three-dwelling outcome is retained on the site. No increase in dwelling numbers, building
height or overall development scale is sought. The localised entry and servicing changes do not
fundamentally alter the development’s character or operation.
- No new use, land parcel, vehicular access or additional traffic-generating activity is proposed. No
integral operational component or identified offset is proposed to be removed. Landscaping and
waste management must remain effective.
- The changes are not expected to introduce prohibited development or trigger public notification
where none was previously required.
- No new or additional referral, other than the statutory exception for the chief executive, or additional
referral assessment matter is identified from the described changes. This position requires
confirmation against the approval’s referral history and current triggers.
- Subject to substantiation of the landscaping and waste servicing outcomes, the changes do not
materially worsen amenity or infrastructure impacts. On that basis, we consider the proposal
capable of assessment as a minor change.
PROPOSED DESIGN CHANGES
The revised architectural plans relocate the pedestrian entry to Unit 3 from the central portion of the Berrima
Row frontage to the north-eastern corner of the site. The applicant advises that discussions with Council
officers have informed the design, particularly the treatment of frontage landscaping. Figure 1 compares the
proposed and approved arrangements below, with the revised Architectural Plans forming Attachment A
to this report.
Figure 1 – Proposed Vs Approved Footpath Comparison
As is evident above, the proposed change considers relocating the pedestrian connection to the north-
eastern corner of the site, where more sympathetic levels allow for a more seamless transition between
Page 2 of 7
Page 3
Berrima Row and Unit 3.
The approved pedestrian access outcome which accommodated the footpath central to the Berrima
Row frontage created an undesirable level difference between the road and the raised terrace. To
improve accessibility for future residents and their guests, the Architectural Plans have been amended
to provide an at grade pedestrian connection and security gate further north along Berrima Row than
currently approved.
The principal planning consideration is the effect of the relocated path on the Berrima Row landscape
treatment. The comparison indicates retained frontage planting and a reconfigured garden and terrace
arrangement. These areas continue to soften the development and provide separation between the
dwelling and the street. Existing street trees provide additional visual context but do not replace the
need for adequate landscaping within the site.
Importantly, the same quantum of landscaping has been achieved across the development, though the
proposed change will deliver a significantly improved private open space and accessibility outcome for
Unit 3.
Other areas of deep planting and feature landscaping treatments have been retained and will continue
to soften the built form, provide privacy for residents and contribute to the broader streetscape
presentation. As a comparable amount of deep planting and soft landscaping has been maintained, we
consider the proposed changes demonstrate consistency with the intent of the approved landscaping
outcomes for the site, whilst improving pedestrian connectivity with Berrima Row.
In addition to the above, the relocated path facilitates an improved path of travel for fire services. As
shown below, the at grade footpath now proposed provides for a more direct route to the rear terraces
of Units 1-3 in the event of an emergency.
Figure 2 – Fire services route
Having regard to the above, we do not consider the proposed changes in any way to compromise the
presentation of the development to the Berrima Row frontage and request Council’s endorsement of the
updated Architectural package.
Page 3 of 7
Page 4
PROPOSED CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
CONDITION 3 – APPROVED PLANS
Development authorised by this approval must be undertaken generally in accordance with
the Approved Plans listed in the tables below.
Applicant Comment
We request the table of approved plans be updated to reference the Architectural Plans provided as
Attachment A to this request. Amendments are in line with the below updated table.
Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date
DA1.06 ST Site Plan, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & 10/09/2026
Design
DA2.01 ST Ground Floor Plan, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA2.02 ST Level 1 Floor Plan, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA2.03 ST Level 2 Floor Plan, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA2.04 ST Roof Plan, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & 10/09/2026
Design
DA3.01 ST North Elevation, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA3.02 ST East Elevation, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA3.03 ST South Elevation, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA3.04 ST West Elevation, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & Design 10/09/2026
DA4.01 ST Section A, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & 10/09/2026
Design
DA4.01 ST Section B, prepared by Black Wood 12/11/2025
Architecture & 10/09/2026
Design
Page 4 of 7
Page 5
CONDITION 13
Applicant Comment
The applicant requests clarity from Council with respect to Condition 13 of the decision notice. In particular,
we note the endorsed built form incorporates a range of external finishes including lightweight and texture
variation. The above condition as written is vague and does not reflect the fact that the current design
achieves the required variation. We request the condition be amended as follows:
13. The external finishes must be provided in accordance with the approved architectural plans
and their materials and finishes schedule. The building must incorporate a mix of
lightweight and textured external finishes, with varied textured finishes to masonry areas to
break up the surfaces.
CONDITION 23
Applicant Comment
Each unit shall be provided with a 1x140L waste bin and 1X240L recycling bin, in accordance with Councils
minimum service levels nominated in Council’s Planning Scheme Policy 9 - Waste Management. The policy
requires a minimum of 120L volume storage per dwelling unit.
An independent bin set down for each unit shall be nominated on the Basement Plan, with this to be
reflected within the Community Management Statement. Each bin storage area shall be impervious and
appropriately sized to accommodate bins.
The existing condition does not expressly require one consolidated bin store. The amendment therefore
seeks explicit acceptance of separate storage areas and a shared washdown facility, while preserving the
required hygiene and drainage controls. This arrangement uses the basement and avoids the potential
need to establish an additional ground-level store within landscaped areas.
Page 5 of 7
Page 6
Figure 3 – Bin storage areas
In support of the above, we request the condition be amended as follows:
23. Bin storage areas and wash down shall be nominated on the Architectural Plans, designed
and maintained in accordance with Planning Scheme Policy PSP9 Waste Management and
the Noosa Plan’s Waste Management Code. Where separate bin storage areas are
nominated, these shall be dedicated to their respective unit with this included within the
Community Management Statement.
Page 6 of 7
Page 7
APPLICATION FEES
In accordance with Council’s current fees and charges schedule 2026/27, it is understood a fee of $3,206.00
applies to a Minor Change request of this nature byway of the following calculation;
Change Application Estimated Fee
Minor change to a Development Approval – minor $3,206.00
matters
Total $3,206.00
We trust this information is sufficient for your purposes, however, should you require any further details or
clarification please do not hesitate to contact the writer by telephone on 0430011617
Yours sincerely,
for Mallee Group
Ben Walsh
Director | Principal Planner
[email protected]
+61 430 011 617
cc: S & J Knobel P/L Tte
Page 7 of 7
Used in these records
PR25042.Minor Change.12Oct2026.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
PR25042.Minor Change.12Oct2026.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.