Council archive · source document
GIA request.msg · MCU22/0199.01
Subject: Re: Attn Antoinette Becker: Generally in Accordance From: Hermes At Deakin Date: 2024-03-19T02:50:30+00:00 To: Antoinette Becker CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual. Hi Antoinette, Thanks for that. We are really keen to get this done. I need to do what ever it takes to get this process completed as soon as possible. These delays are now costing us a lot of money. Please send me an invoice for the $716 fee so that I can pay. Also please tell me what other things I have to do to make this happen quickly. I can attend your office as early as this afternoon if this will expedite this matter. Thanks Ashley Sent from my iPad On 19 Mar 2024, at 12:21 pm, Antoinette Becker <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Ashley I have managed to get an answer from the planner who advises a generally in accordance application is triggered as the approved plans are changing. The cost is $716. We can use this email to begin the process if you wish to proceed. Please let me know. Thanks Antoinette From: Hermes At Deakin <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 1:08 PM To: Mailbox Council Mail <[email protected]> Subject: Attn Antoinette Becker: Generally in Accordance You don't often get email from [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> . Learn why this is important <https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furl.au.m.mimecastprotect.com%2Fs%2F6JvPCvl14VhVnyyUQBHJ8%3Fdomain%3Daka.ms&data=05%7C02%7C[email protected]%7Ceefc0d593ac4403f291d08dc47bf5f85%7C99d9dd67b90f4999a44ef2d3700133b2%7C0%7C0%7C638464134467090803%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CilIU1c%2BndwvGSgQdwjNsE30ChXaDvCFi52Z0Bs%2BnK4%3D&reserved=0> CAUTION: This email originated outside of Council. Do not open links or attachments if the email is unexpected or unusual. Dear Antoinette, Thank you for your time today. As discussed, Karen from Pacific BCQ has indicated that there may be a process required within Council to allow an alternate engineer/builder to be involved in this process. The Original SCG Engineering plans for a driveway and site levelling have been used to complete that work. The SCG Engineering plans will be used for the retaining wall construction. The original Architect and Builder have been replaced with GJ Gardner Noosa (Noosa Custom Homes). The house siting on the pad remains the same. The house footprint is almost identical. The number of bedrooms and bathrooms has remained the same. Could you please let me know what is required so that the builders can submit the final drawings to Council? Thanks Ashley Noosa Council respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the lands and waters of the Noosa area, the Kabi Kabi people, and pays respect to their Elders, past, present and emerging. The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. <20240072 - Preliminary Design Drawings (1).pdf> <2024072 - NSC OPW Decision Notice with Conditions (Dated 20-06-2023).pdf> <NSC MCU Stamped Approved Plans (Dated 12-05-2023) (1).pdf> <2024072 - NSC MCU Decision Notice with Conditions (Dated 19-05-2023) (1).pdf>
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
GIA request.msgRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 120 KB (small file)
- File type
- MSG
No other editions are linked here.