3_Minor Change Letter

Table 4: Substantially different development criteria

 In accordance with Schedule 1 of the                   Response:
 Development Assessment rules, a change may
 be considered to result in substantially different
 development if any of the following apply to the
 change:
 (a) involves a new use; or                             The proposed change does not introduce a new
                                                        use.
 (b) results in the application applying to a new       The proposed change does not introduce a new
 parcel of land; or                                     parcel of land.
 (c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of    The proposed change does not dramatically
 scale, bulk and appearance; or                         change the bulk form of the building with only
                                                        minor works being undertaken to the arbor and
                                                        booster.
 (d) changes the ability of the proposed                The proposed change does not prevent the
 development to operate as intended; or                 development operating as intended. The change
                                                        is to allow the building services to achieve
                                                        compliance and the supporting documentation
                                                        supports the reduced rate of parking as a result.
 (e) removes a component that is integral to the        The alterations proposed does not remove a
 operation of the development; or                       component that is integral to the operation of the
                                                        development. As demonstrated in the attached
                                                        letter by SLR Consulting the reduced parking rate
                                                        will not result in a substantially different
                                                        development to that previously approved from a
                                                        traffic engineering perspective.
 (f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the      The proposed change is not anticipated to impact
 transport network, such as increasing traffic to       traffic flow or the ability to access the site. This
 the site; or                                           item is supported by the attached letter provided
                                                        by SLR Consulting.
 (g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity    The amendments will not result in any new
 of known impacts; or                                   impacts or increase the severity of known
                                                        impacts.
 (h) removes an incentive or offset component that      No offset or incentive is removed as part of the
 would have balanced a negative impact of the           change.
 development; or
 (i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.              The change does not affect the infrastructure
                                                        provisions on the site.



Referral agencies
In accordance with Section 80(1)(a) of the Planning Act 2016, no affected entities are required
to be notified of this minor change application. Referral was triggered to the chief executive,
who is not required to be notified of this minor change application.


Supporting information
In support of this application, the following information will be provided to satisfy the
requirements of Section 79 of the Planning Act 2016:
        DA Form 5
        Land owners consent from the body corporate
        Amended architectural plans by Buchan Architecture
        Traffic Advice by SLR Consulting
        Conditional Building Approval