Skip to the record
Trusted by locals. Built for Noosa.

Council archive · source document

132938-1 Application for a minor change to a development approval (s78-PA) 2018-11-27 · 132008.1128.02

Attached to the e-mail Change to DA (Report, Existing Approval, Bushfire Technical Note, DA Form, Owners consent) - 132008.1128.02.

of 25

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                      Brisbane - Wickham Street Office
                                                         Level 4 HQ South, 520 Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006
                                                                                PO Box 1559, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006
                                                                                                       T +61 7 3539 9500
                                                                                                         D 07 3539 9557


                                                                                        RPS Australia East Pty Ltd ABN 44 140 292 762
                                                                                                       A member of the RPS Group Plc

3 December 2018


Noosa Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565


Our ref:      132938-1
Via:          Email ([email protected])




To whom it may concern,

MINOR CHANGE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL– MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE AND
RECONFIGURING A LOT - GRASSTREE COURT, SUNRISE BEACH QLD 4567, FORMALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOT 6 ON RP901384 AND LOT 9 ON SP252905 (COUNCIL REFERENCE:
132008.1128.01)
In accordance with Section 78 of the Planning Act 2016 (the Act) and on behalf of BlueCare, RPS wish to
make a Minor Change to a Development Approval for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use
and Reconfiguring a Lot (Council reference: 132008.1128.01).
As detailed below, this minor change does not result in change of approved uses but rather minor changes
to internal building layouts to meet current market expectations, industry standards and the existing approval
conditions. While the changes are considered to be ‘minor’, the changes improve the development outcome
in terms of design quality, reduced hardstand area, bushland and waterway protection and bushfire safety.



1. BACKGROUND
On 20 December 2011, the Sunshine Coast Council (the Assessment Manager) approved a development
application for the following aspects of development over land at Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach, formally
described as Lot 6 on RP901384 and Lot 9 on SP252905:
       Material Change of Use for Multiple Housing – Type 3 Retirement and Special Needs (109 x 2bdrm
        units), Commercial Business – Type 2 Medical (as indicated on approved plans) and Wellbeing –
        Type 1 Health (118 beds); and
       Reconfiguring a Lot (1 into 2 lots).
Figure 1 shows the location of the subject site in context of the surrounds.
The proposal will result in the residential aged care facility to be situated on Lot 6 (northern lot) and a
retirement facility to be situated on Lot 9 (southern lot) which includes independent living apartments / units,
and a community facility.




rpsgroup.com.au                                                   Australia Asia Pacific | Europe, Middle East & Africa | North America
Full text of the other 24 pages

Page 2

                                  Figure 1: Land to which the application relates



2. APPROVAL HISTORY
The original approval was due to lapse on 19 December 2017, and therefore in December 2016 a request
was made to Noosa Council to extend and change the existing development approval. This request was
granted on 14 November 2017.
As a result of this approval, the currency period was extended to 19 December 2021 (by this time the use
must have commenced on site otherwise the application will lapse).
As part of the extension request, Council requested minor changes to the proposal to ensure stormwater
treatment and bushfire mitigation within the development were to current standards. This resulted in slight
changes to the approved stormwater basins on the western boundary of Lot 9 and the master plan being
further offset from the southern and western boundaries within Lot 9 to comply with current Bushfire Attack
Levels (BALs).
The shifting of BAL lines within the development resulted in the removal of three independent living units
(ILUs) within the proposal. This loss in yield was not reflected in approval condition 5, however it was shown
on the master plan.
The current master plan approved as part of the extension request is shown below in Figure 2.



132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                Page 2

Page 3

A copy of the current approval is held at Attachment A.




                                           Figure 2: Approved Master Plan
The proposed minor change relates to the Material Change of Use component of the development approval
only. The reconfiguration of a lot approval was enacted in 2013 which has resulted in current Lot 9 on
SP252905 and Lot 1 on SP239726 to the south which was dedicated to Council for conservation / national
park purposes.
Several minor changes are proposed to the development approval to bring the approved product up to
current market standards for retirement living and aged care and to reflect the current preferred ‘care model’
for future residents of all product types. The changes are outlined in detail in Section 3 below. Section 4
confirms that the proposed changes meet the requirements of a Minor Change as defined by the Act.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                Page 3

Page 4

3.   PROPOSED MINOR CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
The following section outlines the proposed minor changes to the development approval. This should be
read in conjunction with the Proposal Plans held at Attachment B, the proposed master plan is shown below
in Figure 3.




                                           Figure 3: Proposed Master Plan




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                          Page 4

Page 5

  3.1 Yield and Uses
Table 1 below identifies the existing and proposed yield and uses:
                            Table 1: Comparison of Approved and Proposed Yields

Use                         Approved*                     Proposed                 Difference

Residential Aged Care 96 aged care beds                   96 aged care beds        -
(RAC)
                      2 respite beds                      0 respite beds           Less 2 respite beds

Retirement Village          20 serviced apartments        0 serviced apartments    Less 20 serviced apartments

                            54 independent living         53 ILUs                  Less 1 ILU
                            units (ILUs)
                            (single storey villas)

                            54 independent living         69 ILAs                  Plus 15 ILAs
                            apartments (ILAs)                                      (Including 15 apartments which
                                                                                   were previously approved in the
                                                                                   location of the 20 ‘serviced
                                                                                   apartments’)

Central Community           1,017m2                       973m2                    Less 44m2
Facility

*As per original approval October 2008, not extension approval dated November 2017 which had resulted in the loss of
three ILUs (51 ILUs) due to bushfire constraints

Conversion of Serviced Apartments to ILAs
The table above demonstrates that the 20 serviced apartments approved above the central community
facility are proposed to be reduced to a yield of 15 and converted to ILAs. This is as a result of a change in
care model over the past 10 years whereby serviced apartments are no longer required as a specific product
as per the following:
        In-home care has replaced the need for serviced apartments. BlueCare (and other providers) are
         able to deliver care to residents of the ILA’s in their home whereas previously, residents that required
         a ‘low care option’, i.e. the serviced apartments, were located in one area only. BlueCare can now
         effectively deliver that ‘low care’ option to all residents throughout the retirement village. So whilst
         BlueCare are technically removing 20 serviced apartments it can be argued that we are in effect
         enabling up to 122 retirement dwellings, with up to two residents in each unit the same level of
         service so the use is not being lost or removed from the development, it is just being delivered via a
         different model. Low care is provided on a user needs and provides service directly into their
         existing accommodation allowing for couples to remain together and residents to age in place for
         longer.
        The RAC accommodation is soley for ‘High care’ wherein the average age upon entry is currently 82
         years old and residents are no longer able to look after themselves in their own accommodation.
        It is our opinion that the conversion of serviced apartments to ILAs constitutes a minor change to the
         proposal as the ILU / ILA residents of the retirement can elect to have some level of care /
         assistance provided or are able to request no assistance whatsoever– similar to that of a serviced
         apartment 10 years ago. We also note that the number of dwellings has not increased and that the




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                       Page 5

Page 6

         changes are in the centre of site so no change to the interface with neighbours will result as a
         consequence of this change.
Respite Beds
BlueCare are moving forward with a model of care for the RAC facility which does not include the two respite
beds as originally approved. This is a change in operation from when the original approval was granted as all
aged care beds within the facility will now be suitable for respite care. Therefore, respite care will still be
accommodated within the proposal.

Noosa Plan Use Definitions
The loss of market demand for serviced apartments has also been reflected within the Noosa Plan
amendments to use definitions. The relevant current use definitions of the scheme are outlined
below:
         Multiple housing Type 3 Retirement and special needs
         Means the use of premises for dwelling units or accommodation units that house persons
         who are aged, being nursed or are convalescing. In each case, communal facilities may be
         available to residents for social interaction, recreation and emergency medical attention.
         The use may also include a caretaker’s residence and medical centre where they are
         ancillary to the residential care facility. The use includes a retirement village, residential
         aged care and a group house, however does not include health uses or community
         residence as separately defined.
         Residential aged care
         Means premises housing elderly persons under the supervision of nursing care. Residents
         are accommodated in bedrooms or bed-sit units but not dwelling units
         Retirement village
         Means premises where older members of the community or retired persons reside, or are
         to reside, in independent living units or serviced units, under a retirement village scheme
The above means that if the original application were to be relodged today, serviced apartments would be
classified under the Retirement village use definition, rather than the ‘Wellbeing Type 1 Health’ use as per
the original approval components (described below for reference):
        Multiple Housing – Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (108 x 2 bedroom units and 20
         serviced apartments)
         Retirement village component comprising the 54 ILUs and 54 ILAs; and 20 serviced apartments
        Commercial Business – Type 2 Medical (as indicated on approved plans)
         Included allied health, community nursing, respite and support / hospitality services within the RAC
         building and the central community facility
        Wellbeing – Type 1 Health (98 beds)
         RAC (96 aged care beds + 2 respite beds)




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                   Page 6

Page 7

  3.2 Density
As part of the minor change, some of the ILA and ILU layouts have been amended internally to
accommodate a third bedroom in comparison to the two bedroom product which was approved.
The original approval involved:
        Retirement Village
         -    54 x 2 bedroom ILAs
         -    54 x 2 bedroom ILUS
         -    11 x 1 bedroom serviced apartments
         -    9 x 2 bedroom serviced apartments
         TOTAL: 245 bedrooms – 128 Units; maximum occupation is 245 residents (limit of 2 per unit)
The proposed minor change involves:
        Retirement Village
         -    37 x 2 bedroom ILAs (includes 15 ILAs which were previously serviced apartments)
         -    32 x 3 bedroom ILAs
         -    17 x 2 bedroom ILUs
         -    36 x 3 bedroom ILUs
         TOTAL: 312 bedrooms – 122 Units; maximum occupation is 244 residents (limit of 2 per unit)
The proposed changes results in no additional units however there will be an increase in the number of
bedrooms on site with an additional 67 bedrooms to be provided within the proposed retirement village
however this does not increase density within the development for the following reasons:
        The Retirement Villages Act 1999 specifies that a person must be at least 55 years of age to enter a
         retirement village, however the average entry age is now closer to 75 years.
        The majority of units are occupied by single people, and hence second and third bedrooms are
         utilised for visitors or for recreational purposes (i.e. a craft / sewing room) or as a study.
        Where a couple resides in the unit, often due to age – individuals will sleep in separate bedrooms
         with the third bedroom being utilised for visitors or recreational purpose as noted above
        Occupation of the ILUs is limited to a maximum of two residents. This is controlled both via the
         Retirement Villages Act, the Resident Management Agreement and on site village management.
It is therefore the case that the increase of bedrooms within the retirement village does not result in
increased density (additional permanent persons residing on site).




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                 Page 7

Page 8

  3.3 Floor Plates / Setbacks
Minor changes to the floor plates for each product type is proposed as a result of this minor change to bring
up to current market standards. Tables 2-4 below provide a comparison of these typical floor plates for the
RAC, Central Facilities and Serviced Apartments and the Apartment Buildings (note: the below figures are
not to scale).
                                       Table 2: RAC Floor Plate Comparison

                        Approved                                                    Proposed




                                                                            Basement no longer proposed




                                                                                    Basement
                        Basement




                      Ground Floor                                                Ground Floor




                        First Floor                                                 First Floor




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                 Page 8

Page 9

                Table 3: Central Facilities and Serviced Apartments Floor Plate Comparison

                      Approved                                                     Proposed




   Basement level previously not proposed




                      Basement                                                    Basement




                    Ground Floor                                            Ground Floor (now ILAs)




                      First Floor                                            First Floor (now ILAs)




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                             Page 9

Page 10

                             Table 4: Apartment Buildings Floor Plate Comparison

                         Approved                                             Proposed




                         Basement                                            Basement




                        First Floor                                          First Floor




                      Second Floor                                          Second Floor

The ILU floor plates are not included above for comparison purposes as they are of a domestic scale and
include three different unit types, please refer to Attachment B – Proposal Plans for details.
Minor changes have been made to the ILU villas layout as a result of increased road efficiency, in particular
the setback to the eastern boundary of the site has been changed to a minimum of 7m from 11m which was
originally approved (which included the buffer of the ‘ring road’ running north to south in this location). The
minor change setback and landscaping solution is superior to the original approval. Furthermore, it allows for
the removal of the ring road and screening planting to be established on the eastern boundary to enhance
the appropriate interface to neighbours.

  3.4 Building Height
Buildings heights within the proposal remain substantially the same. Where minor increases to height have
been made, these are internal to the site to ensure impacts to neighbours are minimised. In particular,
building height is as follows:




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                               Page 10

Page 11

        Residential Aged Care – no change to overall height based on ground floor RL30.6.
        Community Facility – no change to overall height above ground based on ground floor
         RL30.0. The change in the basement car park entry has resulted in exposed basement to the west.
         This creates a part three storey elevation, refer to Section 3.5 below.
        Apartment buildings 1 and 2 – Apartment buildings 1 and 2 have increased RLs of 300mm and
         600mm respectively, however, the reduction to a 5 degree roof pitch does not change the overall
         building RL height.
        Apartment buildings 3 and 4 – Apartment buildings 3 and 4 have decreased RLs of 300mm and
         600mm respectively, therefore, reduced overall building height with 5 degree roof pitch.
        Villas – Units have been designed to match previous building heights.

  3.5 Elevations
As a result of the minor changes to floor plates to meet current market expectations and industry standards,
each elevation for the proposed buildings have been modified as outlined in Attachment B – Proposal
Plans. These minor changes are largely internal to the site and therefore do not create additional impacts for
adjoining neighbours.
The approved and proposed elevations which present outward to the development, including the south RAC
elevation, north community facility elevation and east ILU villa elevation are outlined below.
                                   Table 5: Approved and Proposed Elevations

                         Approved                                                   Proposed




                  South RAC Elevation                                         South RAC Elevation

   A North Community Facility Elevation was not
          included in the approved plans

         North Community Facility Elevation
                                                                        North Community Facility Elevation




                 East ILU Villa Elevation                                    East ILU Villa Elevation




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                    Page 11

Page 12

  3.6 Staging
The existing approval was to be delivered in two stages. For construction purposes, three stages are now
proposed:
        Stage 1: RAC, central facilities, ILAs above the central facilities and 50% of ILUs
        Stage 2: Remaining 50% of ILUs
        Stage 3: Four buildings for the ILAs
These stages are reflected on the Proposal Plans – Attachment B.
A change to the number of stages is not considered a substantial change and falls within the bounds of a
minor change and will enable the efficient delivery of product to the market. Additionally, the change to
staging will have no impact on surrounding residents.

  3.7 Car Parking
Table 6 below provides a comparison of the approved and proposed car parking rates.
It is important to note that the proposed car parking rates as a result of the minor change exceed the
requirements of the Noosa Plan:
                                        Table 6: Car Parking Rates Comparison

Use                         Approved spaces                  Proposed spaces        Difference

RAC                         Staff: 54                        Staff: 38              Less 16 spaces

                            Visitor: 20                      Visitor: 10            Less 10 spaces

                            Emergency Vehicle: 1             Emergency: 1           -

                            Service Vehicle: 1               Service Vehicle: 1     -

Central facilities and      Staff: 5                         Staff: 5               -
serviced apartments
                            Visitor: 16                      Visitor: 14            Less 2 spaces

                            Residents: 7                     Residents: 15          Plus 8 spaces

                            Service Vehicle: 1               Service Vehicle: 1     -

                            Emergency Vehicle: 1             Emergency Vehicle: 1   -

Apartment ILUs              Residents: 65                    Residents: 54          Less 11 spaces

                            Visitors: 17                     Visitors: 14           Less 3 spaces

Villa ILUs                  Residents: 74                    Residents: 81          Plus 7 spaces

                            Visitors: 30                     Visitors: 53           Plus 23 spaces

TOTAL                       292 spaces                       288 spaces             Less 4 spaces

In terms of total car parking numbers for the entire development, the minor change results in the loss of 4 car
parks overall within the development. This represents only a 1.4% decrease in the car parking rates and falls
within a minor change as defined by the Act.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                Page 12

Page 13

RAC Parking
We note that the greatest reduction in car parking numbers is associated with the RAC use. The current car
parking rate for a Residential Aged Care Facility under the Noosa Plan is:
        1 space per 4 residential aged care beds within the facility and 1 emergency vehicle space
As per this rate, to be compliant with the planning scheme, the RAC facility needs to provide 24 spaces + 1
emergency vehicle space. The minor change proposes 48 spaces + 1 emergency vehicle space.
BlueCare will be the operators of the RAC facility and have determined that 48 spaces + 1 emergency
vehicle space will be sufficient for operation for the following reasons:
        All clients will be high care dependency and therefore not capable of driving cars (spaces are not
         needed for these residents). The original approval was designed at a time where there were low-
         care (some of whom drove) and high care clients;
        There will be a maximum of 27 staff at any one time (peak during day / afternoon) Monday to Friday.
         On weekends, a maximum of 20 staff will be on site;
        Shift handover involves up to 17 staff spread over approximately two hours;
        The bus stop on Ben Lexon Drive will facilitate some staff and visitors utilising public transport to
         access the site;
        Peak visitor periods are expected to be mid-morning (older visitors) and early evening (post work –
         young visitors) which is normally outside of staff handover period.
We have also undertaken an analysis into car parking rates for RACs (both nearby developments and other
South East Queensland planning schemes). This analysis confirms the following:
        A RAC development at Goodchap St, Noosaville for 90 beds provided a car parking rate of 0.58
         spaces / bed (Council Ref: MCU18/0019). The approval was issued on 23 October 2018.
        Brisbane City Council RAC car parking rate: 1 space per 6 beds
        Sunshine Coast Council RAC car parking rate: 1 space per 4 beds
It is evident that the proposed car parking rate for the RAC is in accordance with the current market and
operation of aged care developments and well exceeds the car parking rate specified for RACs by Noosa,
Sunshine Coast and Brisbane Councils.

  3.8 Circulation / Access / Egress / Refuse Collection
The internal road network has changed to reduce the amount of road to improve efficiency, increase
landscaping opportunities and improve the visual appeal of the proposal while also maintaining appropriate
manoeuvrability. Of key difference is the following:
        Removal of the north/south road along the eastern boundary of Lot 9
        Removal of the east/west road separating the originally approved ‘Type H’ villas on the northern
         boundary of Lot 9
        Changed access to the villas south of the community facility on Lot 9
        Inclusion of laneways in the north east and south east corners of Lot 9 to service four villas. Refuse
         vehicles are not intended to access these laneways hence the inclusion of ‘waste collection points’ at
         the entrance to these laneways




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                  Page 13

Page 14

        Access / egress from Grasstree Court remains unchanged to both Lot 6 (three access points
         maintained) and Lot 9 (two access points maintained)
        The proposal now includes one consolidated basement entry / egress for the apartment buildings in
         comparison to the two originally approved
        While three access points are maintained from Grasstree Court, the car parking area towards the
         frontage of Lot 6 has been modified to ensure better manoeuvrability / operation / access-egress.
        The visitor parking associated with the ILUs which was situated throughout the internal road network
         is now to be situated in the driveway of each ILU. The driveway has been designed to a sufficient
         length to accommodate a car while not impeding pedestrian access through the internal path
         network.

  3.9 Civil Engineering
Calibre has prepared a Civil Engineering Technical Memorandum – Attachment C to confirm the
servicing requirements for the proposed development and the changes proposed from the original approval
solutions. The memorandum addresses the following engineering items:
        External Works
        Internal Works
        Stormwater Management
        Internal Services
The following information highlights the minor changes to civil engineering solutions only, for further
information refer to Attachment C.
External Works – Watermain
A water network analysis has been undertaken as it is proposed to service the development with a water
flow which can achieve 30 litres / second for the purposes of fire fighting. This water flow is consistent with
the flow demands for a site with this proposed use.
The water analysis identifies that with the construction of an additional 150mm water main along Grasstree
Court, the required water flow for fire fighting can be achieved without detrimental impact to the surrounding
water network.
Additional details and the water analysis are held at Attachment C.

Stormwater
Changes have been proposed to the stormwater management solutions for the site in response to upgrades
to standards and advice from Noosa Council. The locations of proposed stormwater devices are generally in
keeping with the approval locations however we have now undertaken further work and established more
detailed solutions. Hence we have included a new stormwater management plan for assessment.
The masterplan has been updated to reflect the proposed changes to shapes and dimensions of the
stormwater basins. The Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Calibre is held within Attachment C.
The report ensures stormwater management within the proposal will be undertaken in accordance with local
and State requirements. The report confirms the following:
        Stormwater detention for downstream flood mitigation will be deleted from the design in accordance
         with Condition 63.1 of the Decision Notice.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                 Page 14

Page 15

        The southern (retirement living) bioretention basin size and location has been amended from that of
         the existing approval. Additionally, a separate infiltration basin has been added in accordance with
         the Girraween Stormwater Management Plan. Attachment C holds an engineering drawing showing
         these stormwater changes.
        The northern RAC bioretention basin size and location has been amended to use a proprietary
         cartridge system from the treatment of water quality. Additionally, a separate infiltration basin has
         been added in accordance with the Girraween Stormwater Management Plan.
The stormwater solution presented within Attachment C will be adopted moving forward to detailed design
and operational works applications.

  3.10 Bushfire
A Bushfire Technical Note has been prepared by Meridian Urban and is held at Attachment D. The
technical note confirms that the nature of the minor changes proposed continue to comply with or improve
upon the previous bushfire assessments completed by Land Graphics (with the original application in 2008)
and by RPS (with the extension application in 2017).
The minor changes proposed, in relation to bushfire protection include:
        Altered building siting for the residential aged care facility on Lot 6 and minor change to the internal
         layout; and
        Altered product and layout for the retirement facility on Lot 9 including the revised vehicle circulation
         network.
None of the proposed minor changes impact upon the identified asset protection zones or separation buffers
previously noted by RPS in 2017, or other bushfire protection measures which have been identified.
The proposed RAC facility is to be shifted forward towards Grasstree Court to increase the extent of
separation to the narrow vegetated tributary to the rear of the site, between the site and Sunshine Beach
State High School to the north. Whilst this corridor is constrained by virtue of its dimensions and disturbance
/ management, relocation to achieve a separation distance of BAL 29 is now provided. This represents a
substantial improvement from the existing approval.
The revised vehicle circulation network across Lot 9 and servicing the approved retirement facility remains
capable of accommodating emergency fire appliances, as required. Further, it does not present any adverse
or unintended impacts on existing adjoining development to the east from what was previously approved.
As per the current set of approval conditions, a bushfire hazard assessment and management plan is being
prepared and will be submitted to Council for assessment as part of the forthcoming Operational Works
application.

  3.11 Landscaping
Changes to landscaping are purely a result of the proposed changes within the master plan layout. A
Landscape Concept Plan has been prepared by Urbis which is held at Attachment E which reflects this
minor change. The Concept Plan is shown below in Figure 4.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                   Page 15

Page 16

                                         Figure 4: Landscape Concept Plan
The same level of landscaping is achieved through the proposal and minor reduction in hardstand area is
achieved given the reduced road area.
As required by the approval conditions, a detailed landscape package will be provided as part of forthcoming
Operational Works applications.

  3.12 Ecology / Offsets
We note that the existing approval conditions require offsetting for the proposed clearing of the site. The
proposed minor change is not to affect this clearing and offsetting and operational works for this component
will proceed as per the approval.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                             Page 16

Page 17

    4. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE LIST OF APPROVED PLANS /
       DOCUMENTS AND CONDITIONS
The following section outlines the proposed changes to the approved plans / documents and conditions. This
section should be read in conjunction with Attachment B (Revised Proposal Plans).
Proposed changes to approved plans / documents
Table 7 below identifies the proposed changes in red to the plans / documents required to reflect this minor
change request.
                           Table 7 – Proposed change to approved plans / documents

Plan No.              Rev.        Plan Name                                          Date

7448-06                           Lots 1 & 9 Cancelling Lot 1 on SP177650            15 May 2008
                                  prepared by Conics (Sunshine Coast) Pty Ltd

132938-01D                        Masterplan prepared by RPS Smith + Tracey          18 October 2017
DA_106                            Architects                                         November 2018

DA_107                            Staging Plan prepared by Smith + Tracey            November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_108                            Precincts Plan prepared by Smith + Tracey          November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_109                            Pedestrian Circulation prepared by Smith +         November 2018
                                  Tracey Architects

DA_110                            Vehicular Circulation prepared by Smith + Tracey   November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_111                            Building Setbacks prepared by Smith + Tracey       November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_112                            Landscaping Calculation prepared by Smith +        November 2018
                                  Tracey Architects

DA_113                            Site Cover Calculations prepared by Smith +        November 2018
                                  Tracey Architects

DA_115                            Typical Site Section A prepared by Smith + Tracey November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_116                            External Finishes Schedule prepared by Smith +     November 2018
                                  Tracey Architects

DA_117                            Area Schedules prepared by Smith + Tracey          November 2018
                                  Architects

DA11                  P1          Residential Aged Care – Ground Floor / Site Plan   November 2008 2018
DA_118                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA12                  P1          Residential Aged Care – First Floor Plan prepared November 2008 2018
DA_119                            by Smith + Tracey Architects




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                              Page 17

Page 18

DA_120                            Residential Aged Care – Roof Plan prepared by      November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA13                  P1          Residential Aged Care – Basement prepared by       November 2008
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA14                              Residential Aged Care – N and W Elevations         May 2008
DA_121                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects              November 2018

DA15                              Residential Aged Care – S and E Elevations         May 2008
DA_122                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects              November 2018

DA_123                            Residential Aged Care – Typical Sections           November 2018
                                  prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA16                  P1          Residential Aged Care – Village Site Plan          November 2008
DA_124                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects              November 2018

DA_125                            Central Facilities & ILAs – Basement Car Park      November 2018
                                  prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA17                  P1          Central Facilities & Serviced Apartments ILAs –    November 2008
DA_126                            Ground Floor Plan prepared by Smith + Tracey       November 2018
                                  Architects

DA18                  P1          Apartment Type sa-1b & 2b prepared by Smith +      November 2008
                                  Tracey Architects

DA19                              Central Facilities & Serviced Apartments ILAs –    May 2008
DA_127                            Level 1 First Floor Plan prepared by Smith +       November 2018
                                  Tracey Architects

DA20                              Central Facilities & Serviced Apartments –         May 2008
                                  Elevations and Section prepared by Smith +
                                  Tracey Architects

DA21                              Central Facilities & Serviced Apartments – S and   May 2008
                                  W Elevations prepared by Smith + Tracey
                                  Architects

DA22                  P1          Apartment Buildings – Basement prepared by         November 2008
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA23                  P1          Apartment Buildings – Level 1 prepared by Smith    November 2008
                                  + Tracey Architects

DA24                  P1          Apartment Buildings – Level 2 prepared by Smith    November 2008
                                  + Tracey Architects

DA25                              Independent Living Apartment Type a1-2b & a3-      November 2008
DA_128                            2b+s (& handed) prepared by Smith + Tracey         November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_131                            Central Facilities & ILAs – E Elevation and Typical November 2018
                                  Section prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                             Page 18

Page 19

DA_132                            Central Facilities & ILAs – N Elevation & Typical   November 2018
                                  Section prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_133                            Apartment Buildings – Basement Plan prepared        November 2018
                                  by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_134                            Apartment Buildings – Ground Floor Plan             November 2018
                                  prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_135                            Apartment Buildings – First Floor Plan prepared     November 2018
                                  by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA26                              Apartment Type a2-2b & a4-2b type a3-3b             November 2008
DA_136                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects               November 2018

DA_137                            Apartment Buildings – E & W Elevations prepared     November 2018
                                  by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_138                            Apartment Buildings – Typical N Elevation &         November 2018
                                  Section prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_139                            Apartment Building 4 / Roof Plan prepared by        November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_140                            Apartment Building 4 / Sections prepared by         November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_141                            Apartment Building 3 / Roof Plan prepared by        November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_142                            Apartment Building 3 / Sections prepared by         November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_143                            Apartment Building 2 / Roof Plan prepared by        November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_144                            Apartment Building 2 / Sections prepared by         November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_145                            Apartment Building 1 / Roof Plan prepared by        November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_146                            Apartment Building 1 / Sections prepared by         November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_147                            Apartment Buildings – Photo Montage from            November 2018
                                  National Park prepared by Smith + Tracey
                                  Architects

DA27                              Apartment Buildings - Elevations prepared by        May 2008
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA28                              Apartment Buildings – Elevation and Section         May 2008
                                  prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA31                              ILU Type b-2b1g prepared by Smith + Tracey          May 2008
                                  Architects




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                             Page 19

Page 20

DA32                              ILU Type b-2b+s/2g prepared by Smith + Tracey    May 2008
                                  Architects

DA33                              ILU Type c-2b1g C (2B-1G) prepared by Smith +    May 2008
DA_148                            Tracey Architects                                November 2018

DA_149                            ILU Type C (3B-2G) prepared by Smith + Tracey    November 2018
                                  Architects

DA_150                            ILU Type D (3B-2G) prepared by Smith + Tracey    November 2018
                                  Architects

DA34                              ILU Type c-2b+s/2g prepared by Smith + Tracey    May 2008
                                  Architects

DA35                              ILU Type d-2b+s/2g prepared by Smith + Tracey    May 2008
                                  Architects

DA36                              ILU Type h-2b1g H1 (2B-1G) + K1 (3B-2G)          May 2008
DA_151                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects            November 2018

DA_152                            ILU Type H2 (2B-1G) + H2 (3B-2G) prepared by     November 2018
                                  Smith + Tracey Architects

DA_153                            Independent Living Units – Roof Plans prepared   November 2018
                                  by Smith + Tracey Architects

DA37                              Independent Living Units – Elevations Sheet 1    May 2008
DA_154                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects            November 2018

DA38                              Independent Living Units – Elevations Sheet 2    May 2008
DA_155                            prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects            November 2018

DA_156                            Independent Living Units – Typical Sections      November 2018
                                  prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects

0673 DA ADD P47                   Masterplan / Carparking Layout prepared by       May 2008
DA_114                            Smith + Tracey Architects                        November 2018



Proposed changes to approval conditions
Table 8 below identifies the proposed changes in red to the approval conditions required to reflect this minor
change request.
                               Table 8 – Proposed changes to approval conditions

    5. The approved development comprises the following:
           Multiple housing – Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (109 x 2 bdrm units) (122
              independent living units and apartments)
           Commercial Business – Type 2 Medical (as indicated on approved plans)
           Wellbeing – Type 1 Health (118 beds) (96 beds)




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                              Page 20

Page 21

    7. The development may be staged in accordance with the plan titled ‘Masterplan’ prepared by RPS
         dated 18 October 2017, Plan Ref: 132938-01D Smith + Tracey dated November 2018, Plan Ref:
         DA_106
    14. The Vegetation Management operational works application must detail the location and extent of
         vegetation disturbance on Lot 1 SP177650 Lot 9 on SP252905 and Lot 6 on RP901384 must be
         accurately marked on-site, including any setback requirements for bushfire mitigation purposes, for
         Council officers to inspect prior to commencement of any vegetation clearing.
    18. Any lighting to the development is not to impact on the ecological values of the adjacent National
         Park and the southern portion of Lot 1 SP177650 Lot 9 on SP252905, i.e. lighting must not be
         directed toward, and light spill must be minimised to, the adjacent National Park or remnant
         vegetation to the south. Details of the design response to this requirement must be submitted with
         the application for operational works.
    30.1 Remove the existing roadway and footpath connection between Ben Lexcen Drive and the adjacent
         service road through the north-east corner of Lot 1 on SP177650 Lot 9 on SP252905 and across
         the Ben Lexcen Drive verge. Kerb must be re-instated on the western side of Ben Lexcen Drive
         where the roadway connection currently joins and a concrete footpath, at least 2 metres wide, must
         be constructed along the western verge of Ben Lexcen Drive from this point up to the intersection
         with the Grasstree Court extension.
    33. Pedestrian crossings shall be provided in Grasstree Court generally as shown on ‘Masterplan’
         prepared by RPS dated 18 October 2017, Plan Ref: 132938-01D Smith + Tracey dated November
         2018, Plan Ref: DA_106. The crossing shall include linemarking and suitable signage in
         accordance with the MUTCD.
    35. Vehicular access driveways to service the development shall be constructed from the Grasstree
         Court frontages of the site. The driveways shall be generally in accordance with Council’s standard
         drawing SEQ R-051 and Masterplan prepared by RPS dated 18 October 2017, Plan Ref: 132938-
         01D Smith + Tracey dated November 2018, Plan Ref: DA_106.
    39. The vehicle access driveway to proposed carparking level in Apartment Building 3 the apartment
         buildings must be constructed prior to the commencement of the use in Apartment Building 3. Of
         the apartment buildings.
    40.1 Generally in accordance with drawing number ‘Masterplan’ prepared by RPS dated 18 October
         2017, Plan Ref: 132938-01D Smith + Tracey dated November 2018, Plan Ref: DA_106
    41. Carparking shall be provided within the sites generally as shown on drawings number
         0673_DA_ADD_P47 DA_114 ‘MASTERPLAN/Carpark Layout” prepared by Smith + Tracey
         Architects dated October 2008 November 2018, 0673_DA13/P1 “Residential Aged Care –
         Basement” prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects dated May 2008 November 2018,
         0673_DA22/P1 DA_133 “Apartment Buildings – Basement” prepared by Smith + Tracey Architects
         dated May 2008 November 2018 and within “Independent Living Units” as shown on the approved
         floor plans, except as modified herein.
    44. One of the carspaces at the western end of the ground floor parking area of the “Residential Aged
         Care’ shown on drawing number 0673_DA13/P1 shall be dedicated as a turning / manoeuvring
         area.
    45. One of the carspaces at the eastern end of the ground floor parking area of the “Residential Aged
         Care’ shown on drawing number 0673_DA13/P1 shall be dedicated as a turning / manoeuvring
         area.



132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                             Page 21

Page 22

    72. The fire-fighting demand on Unitywater’s water supply system from the development must not
         exceed 15 30 litres per second.
    80. Prior to the issue of any Development Permit for Operational Works amended plans for the
         development must be submitted to and approved by Council, the amended plans must be
         consistent with the ‘Masterplan’ prepared by RPS dated 18 October 2017, Plan Ref: 132938-01D.



    6. MINOR CHANGE STATUS
The proposed change to the development approval is consistent with the definition of a ‘minor change’ under
the Act as demonstrated in Table 9 below:
                                    Table 9 – Minor Change Test under the Act

Minor change means a change that – for a development approval –
(i) Would not result in substantially different                 Refer to Table 5 below which demonstrates the
    development                                                 changes does not result in ‘substantially different
                                                                development’.
If a development application for the development, including the change, were made when the change
application is made would not cause –
    (a) The inclusion of prohibited development in the The proposed changes do not include prohibited
        application; or                                development in the application.
    (b) Referral to a referral agency, other than to the Not applicable. There were referral agencies for the
        chief executive, if there were no referral       original development application.
        agencies for the development application; or
    (c) Referral to extra referral agencies, other than         The original application was referrable to the
        to the chief executive; or                              Department of Environmental and Resource
                                                                Management (DERM) for the following matters:
                                                                    Vegetation clearing
                                                                    Koala conservation
                                                                    Wetlands
                                                                    Conservation estate
                                                                If the application were remade at the time of this
                                                                change application being lodged, a referral to the
                                                                Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR)
                                                                would be required as an extra referral agency for the
                                                                following trigger:
                                                                    Infrastructure related referral (State transport
                                                                      infrastructure) for exceeding the thresholds
                                                                      specified in Schedule 20 of the Planning
                                                                      Regulation 2017 (the Regulation).
                                                                However DTMR is part of the chief executive and
                                                                therefore the changes remain definable as a ‘minor
                                                                change’.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                       Page 22

Page 23

    (d) A referral agency to assess the application             As specified above, DERM and DTMR are the
        against, or have regard to, matters prescribed          applicable referral agencies if the application was
        by regulation under section 55(2), other than           remade at the time of this application being lodged.
        matters the referral agency must have                   The matters which DERM had regard to in assessing
        assessed the application against, or have had           the original application are outlined in (c) above.
        regard to, when the application was made; or            DERM is not required to assess the application
                                                                against, or have regard to, any additional matters
                                                                prescribed under the regulation.


    (e) Public notification if public notification was not The original development application required public
        required for the development application.          notification.



    (i)    The change would not result in substantially different development considering the individual
           circumstances of the development in the context of the changes proposed, and having regard to
           the matters indicated at Section 4 of Schedule 1 to the Development Assessment Rules


Schedule 1 - Development Assessment Rules                   Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:
    (a) involves a new use                                      The minor change does not introduce new uses and
                                                                maintains the approved uses of:
                                                                  Retirement village and community centre
                                                                     facility (Multiple Housing – Type 3 Retirement
                                                                     and Special Needs)
                                                                  Residential care facility (Wellbeing – Type 1
                                                                     Health)
                                                                  Medical services provided within the
                                                                     residential care facility (Commercial Business
                                                                     – Type 2 Medical)
    (b) results in the application applying to a new            The minor change does not result in the application
        parcel of land                                          applying to a new parcel of land.
                                                                We note that the real property descriptions are
                                                                different to the original application but this is a result
                                                                of the approved subdivision being enacted.
    (c) dramatically changes the built form in terms            While tweaks are proposed to many aspects of the
        of scale, bulk and appearance                           approval to bring the product to current market
                                                                standards, the changes do not dramatically change
                                                                the built form in terms of scale, bulk and
                                                                appearance. This has been clearly demonstrated in
                                                                Section 2 above.
    (d) changes the ability of the proposed                     The proposal will operate as intended and provide a
        development to operate as intended                      modern facility to accommodate the northern
                                                                Sunshine Coast’s ageing population as envisaged
                                                                for the site by the Noosa Plan.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                          Page 23

Page 24

    (e) removes a component that is integral to the             The minor changes sought do not remove a
        operation of the development                            component that is integral to the operation of the
                                                                development. The transition of the ‘serviced
                                                                apartments’ to ‘independent living units’ does not
                                                                remove this offering from the proposal. As detailed
                                                                in Section 2 above – the proposal will still be able to
                                                                ‘service’ the proposed apartments and villas within
                                                                the retirement village.
    (f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the           The proposal results in a loss of four car parks in
        transport network, such as increasing traffic           total across the development.
        to the site                                             The proposed car parking arrangements have been
                                                                formulated to ensure they remain compliant with the
                                                                current Noosa Plan and as demonstrated within
                                                                Section 3.2 above, no changes to the density result
                                                                from the proposal.
                                                                Therefore, we do not believe the proposed changes
                                                                significantly impact on traffic flow and the transport
                                                                network.
    (g) introduces new impacts or increase the                  The proposal appropriately manages all known
        severity of known impacts                               impacts and does not introduce new impacts.


    (h) removes an incentive or offset component                The original approval involved a vegetation offset
        that would have balanced a negative impact              which is being maintained and carried out as per the
        of the development                                      current approval conditions.
    (i) impacts on infrastructure provisions                    The proposal does not impact on infrastructure
                                                                provisions as there are no changes to density on the
                                                                site. Therefore there will be no change to the impact
                                                                of infrastructure in the area.



The above minor change request is accompanied by the following supporting information:
        Attachment A                Existing Approval
        Attachment B                Proposal Plans
        Attachment C                Engineering Technical Note
        Attachment D                Bushfire Technical Note
        Attachment E                Landscape Concept Plans
        Attachment F                Planning Act Form 5 – Change Application
        Attachment G                Owner’s Consent


The application fee of $4,455.00 will be paid upon receipt of Council’s invoice.




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                                       Page 24

Page 25

If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact Penny Cooper on 07 3539 9714 or
the undersigned on 07 3539 9557.


Yours sincerely,
RPS




CHIARA TOWLER
Senior Planner




132938-1 | Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach: Minor Change | 3 December 2018                            Page 25

Used in these records

About this file

File size
6.2 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

132938-1 Application for a minor change to a development approval (s78-PA) 2018-11-27.pdf · 6.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.