Council archive · source document
geotech report · 132003.220660.5
Any poorly compacted surficial fill and very loose natural sands encountered in the investigation may extend across the site boundaries. We therefore advise that sudden stop/start movements of any tracked equipment be avoided in order to reduce transmission of ground vibrations to the adjacent steep fill batter slope to the north-west within the neighbouring road reserve as this could cause localised instability. 6.3.3 Groundwater Seepage Groundwater seepage was not encountered in the previous ASI boreholes and there were no traces of seepage noted during the current investigation when extracting the DCP rods. Some ephemeral seepage inflows may be encountered in any excavations particularly after periods of heavy or prolonged rainfall. In general, we expect that inflows, if any, to be of very small volume and managed by infiltration into the sandy subgrade. Inspection and monitoring of groundwater seepage during excavations is recommended, so that any unexpected conditions, which may be revealed can be incorporated into the drainage design. 6.4 Temporary Excavation Support and Retention Temporary batter slopes through the sandy soil profile no steeper than 1 Vertical (V) in 1.5 Horizontal (H) may be achievable within the site geometry over the northern and western sides of the excavation provided any existing landscape retaining walls are removed. Some instability of temporary sand batters may occur at, or below, the level of any groundwater seepage should it occur, especially after rain periods, and sand bagging may be required to stabilise the lower portion of these batters. Stockpiles of construction materials, excavated materials, existing footings, etc. must be kept well clear of the batter crests to avoid surcharging the slopes. Where battering cannot be accommodated within the site geometry, or is not preferred, a full depth engineered piled wall retention system must be installed prior to excavation commencing. Due to the close proximity of the northern side of the existing house and the presence of poorly compacted sandy fill and very loose sands, deflections will need to be reduced. Adjacent to the existing house and any landscape retaining walls that are to remain, the piles may need to be provided with corbels to support the existing high level house footings and/or temporary propping of the heads of the piles provided. Considering the maximum retained height will be about 1.5m it is likely that cantilever piled walls will be suitable where adjacent structures are not located within the ZoI, as defined above pending confirmation by the structural engineer. The piles would need to extend to sufficient depth below bulk excavation level (BEL) to satisfy stability considerations. The structural engineer must design the shoring walls, calculate the potential deflections and make an assessment of the effect of the deflections on nearby structures. The structural engineer must then make an assessment as to whether the shoring walls must be stiffened and/or braced, and whether any underpinning of nearby structures are required. 32032URrpt 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
geotech report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.