Original source · versioned page text
REFUSED Decision Notice DBW24 0134& RAP240045
Officer: Matthew Pinese
Direct Telephone: 07 53296316
Our Reference: DBW24/0134 & RAP24/0045
Your Reference: 2024-6045
7 August 2025
LK Omeros & M Omeros
C/- Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
3/93 Hilton Tce
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
[email protected]
Dear Jack,
Decision Notice
Planning Act 2016
I refer to your application and advise that on 31 July 2025, Council decided to refuse the
application.
Details of the decision are as follows:
1. APPLICATION DETAILS
Application No: DBW24/0134 and RAP24/0045
Street address: 58 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine Beach
Real property description: Lot 65 on RP81810
Planning Scheme: Noosa Plan 2020 (25 September 2020)
2. TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
The application was a Development Application for the following matters:
Building Work Assessable Against the Planning Scheme - Dwelling House (Coastal Protection);
and Referral Agency – Design and Siting (Setbacks)
3. REASONS FOR REFUSAL
Council decided to refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO1 of the Coastal Protection
and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code as the proposed development does not allow for natural
fluctuations of the coast and foreshores to occur, including allowance of climate change.
2. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO3 of the Coastal Protection
and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code as the proposed development extends approximately 9
metres seaward of the coastal building line.
3. The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO2 of State Code 8.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500
ABN: 97 969 214 121
[email protected] TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501
www.noosa.qld.gov.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
4. It has not been demonstrated that the proposal complies with Performance Outcome PO5
of State Code 8.
5. It has not been demonstrated that the proposal complies with Performance Outcome PO6
of State Code 8.
4. REFERRAL AGENCY MATTERS:
The Assessment Manager would have been a referral agency pursuant to Planning Regulation
2017, Schedule 9, Part 3, Division 2, Table 3 – Design and Siting for part of the application (building
work assessable against the building assessment provisions) and so has the functions and powers
of a referral agency for that part.
5. REFERRAL AGENCIES
The referral agencies applicable to this application are:
Referral Status Referral Agency and Referral Trigger Response
Address
Concurrence SARA Planning Regulation The agency provided its
2017 response on 10
Schedule 9, Part 3, December 2024
South East
Division 1, Table 1 (Reference No. 2404-
Queensland (North)
(Planning Regulation 39910 SRA) A copy of
regional
2017) the response is
office attached
Level 4, Foundation
Place 3 South Sea Building works seaward
of a coastal building
Islander Way,
works
Maroochydore
PO Box 1129,
Maroochydore QLD
4558
6. SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
7. RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the
Planning Act 2016 is attached.
8. OTHER DETAILS
If you wish to obtain more information about the decision, electronic copies are available on line at
www.noosa.qld.gov.au or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully,
Matthew Pinese
Development Planner
Page 2 of 4
Page 3
Enc: Appeal Rights
Page 3 of 4
[OCR of page images]
Enc: Appeal Rights
Page 3 of 4
Page 4
Appeal Rights
PLANNING ACT 2016 & PLANNING REGULATION 2017
Chapter 6 Dispute resolution (3) The appellant or, for an appeal to a tribunal, the registrar must,
within the service period, give a copy of the notice of appeal to –
Part 1 Appeal rights
(a) the respondent for the appeal; and
229 Appeals to tribunal or P&E Court
(b) each co-respondent for the appeal; and
(1) Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016 states –
(c) for an appeal about a development application under schedule
(a) Matters that may be appealed to –
1, table 1, item 1 – each principal submitter for the
(i) either a tribunal or the P&E Court; or development application; and
(ii) only a tribunal; or (d) for and appeal about a change application under schedule 1,
table 1, item 2 – each principal submitter for the change
(iii) only the P&E Court; and
application; and
(b) The person-
(e) each person who may elect to become a co-respondent for the
(i) who may appeal a matter (the appellant); and appeal, other than an eligible submitter who is not a principal
submitter in an appeal under paragraph (c) or (d); and
(ii) who is a respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(f) for an appeal to the P&E Court – the chief executive; and
(iii) who is a co-respondent in an appeal of the matter; and
(g) for an appeal to a tribunal under another Act – any other
(iv) who may elect to be a co-respondent in an appeal of the
person who the registrar considers appropriate.
matter.
(4) The service period is –
(2) An appellant may start an appeal within the appeal period.
(a) if a submitter or advice agency started the appeal in the P&E
(3) The appeal period is –
Court – 2 business days after the appeal has started; or
(a) for an appeal by a building advisory agency – 10 business
(b) otherwise – 10 business days after the appeal is started.
days after a decision notice for the decision is given to the
agency; or (5) A notice of appeal given to a person who may elect to be a co-
respondent must state the effect of subsection (6).
(b) for an appeal against a deemed refusal – at any time after the
deemed refusal happens; or (6) A person elects to be a co-respondent by filing a notice of election,
in the approved form, within 10 business days after the notice of
(c) for an appeal against a decision of the Minister, under chapter
appeal is given to the person.
7, part 4, to register premises or to renew the registration of
premises – 20 business days after a notice us published under 231 Other appeals
section 269(3)(a) or (4); or
(1) Subject to this chapter, schedule 1 and the P&E Court Act, unless
(d) for an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice – 20 the Supreme Court decides a decision or other matter under this
business days after the infrastructure charges notice is given Act is affected by jurisdictional error, the decision or matter is non-
to the person; or appealable.
(e) for an appeal about a deemed approval of a development (2) The Judicial Review Act 1991, part 5 applies to the decision or
application for which a decision notice has not been given – matter to the extent it is affected by jurisdictional error.
30 business days after the applicant gives the deemed
(3) A person who, but for subsection (1) could have made an
approval notice to the assessment manager; or
application under the Judicial Review Act 1991 in relation to the
(f) for any other appeal – 20 business days after a notice of the decision or matter, may apply under part 4 of that Act for a
decision for the matter, including an enforcement notice, is statement of reasons in relation to the decision or matter.
given to the person.
(4) In this section –
Note – decision includes-
See the P&E Court Act for the court’s power to extend the appeal
(a) conduct engaged in for the purpose of making a decision; and
period.
(b) other conduct that relates to the making of a decision; and
(4) Each respondent and co-respondent for an appeal may be heard
in the appeal. (c) the making of a decision or failure to make a decision; and
(5) If an appeal is only about a referral agency’s response, the (d) a purported decision; and
assessment manager may apply to the tribunal or P&E Court to
(e) a deemed refusal.
withdraw from the appeal.
non-appealable, for a decision or matter, means the decision or
(6) To remove any doubt. It is declared that an appeal against an
matter-
infrastructure charges notice must not be about-
(a) is final and conclusive; and
(a) the adopted charge itself; or
(b) may not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed,
(b) for a decision about an offset or refund-
set aside or called into question in any other way under the
(i) the establishment cost of trunk infrastructure identified in Judicial Review Act 1991 or otherwise, whether by the
a LGIP; or Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity; and
(ii) the cost of infrastructure decided using the method (c) is not subject to any declaratory, injunctive or other order of
included in the local government’s charges resolution. the Supreme Court, another court, a tribunal or another entity
on any ground.
230 Notice of appeal
232 Rules of the P&E Court
(1) An appellant starts an appeal by lodging, with the registrar of the
tribunal or P&E Court, a notice of appeal that- (1) A person who is appealing to the P&E Court must comply with the
rules of the court that apply to the appeal.
(a) is in the approved form; and
(b) succinctly states the grounds of the appeal. (2) However, the P&E Court may hear and decide an appeal even if
the person has not complied with the rules of the P&E Court
(2) The notice of appeal must be accompanied by the required fee.
Page 4 of 4