Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment F - Carparking Evaluation -Noosa Carparking Study - McGagney report

of 140

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies


x 7\SH 5HWDLO6KRS6DORQ
x 7\SH5HFUHDWLRQ$PXVHPHQW )LWQHVV
x &RPPHUFLDO%XVLQHVV 2IILFH5HDO(VWDWHHWF 
        
,QWHUPVRIHVWLPDWLQJQRQUHVLGHQWLDOWHQDQFLHVZHVXUYH\HGHDFKVLWHDQGGHWHUPLQHG
DSSOLFDEOH*)$RQWKHIROORZLQJJURXQGV

 x 3ODQQLQJ6FKHPHVSUHIHUHQFHIRU+DVWLQJ6WWRIRFXVRQQRQUHVLGHQWLDOXVHVDWVWUHHW
     OHYHO
 x %XLOGLQJGHVLJQ GHILQLQJFKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIUHVLGHQWLDO QRQUHVLGHQWLDOVWUXFWXUHV 
 x %DVHGRQSRLQWLGHQWLI\VPDOOVWDQGDORQHWHQDQFLHVDQGODUJHUFRORFDWHGWHQDQFLHV





[OCR of page images]
e Type 1 & 2 Retail, Shop, Salon;
e Type 2 Recreation, Amusement, & Fitness
e Commercial Business (Office, Real Estate etc.)

In terms of estimating non-residential tenancies we surveyed each site and determined
applicable GFA on the following grounds:

e Planning Schemes preference for Hasting St to focus on nonresidential uses at street

level;
e Building design (defining characteristics of residential & non-residential structures);

e Based on point 2 identify small standalone tenancies and larger co-located tenancies.

Log in to download the original (Attachment F - Carparking Evaluation -Noosa Carparking Study - McGagney report.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.