Original source · versioned page text
Attachment F - Carparking Evaluation -Noosa Carparking Study - McGagney report
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (10.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Noosa Council
Noosa Car Parking Study 2017 - 2032
Final Report
Table 5-1: Parking Demand Management Options
Efficiency Effectiveness
Parking
Key features Potential benefits Potential risks Short- Long-
Strategy Benefits Costs Value
term term
The implementation of parking Very effective method of controlling When implemented in isolation, prices may
costs priced by length of stay parking demand encourage a shift in clientele to other town
Encourages higher turnover of parking centres (and thus may be opposed by local
spaces business owners). This risk may be mitigated
Priced
Allows for flexible demand by coordinated local and regional Average Average Average Average High
parking
management implementation of priced parking.
Charges cost of parking directly to user May be politically difficult to implement unless
Priorities for higher priority users strong existing parking demand justifies it
Discourages long term visitors
Time limits on parking to increase Encourages higher turnover of parking Stringent parking controls may discourage
Time Limits turnover, supported by parking spaces high value visitors
and other enforcement Can be used to target specific user Results in additional enforcement costs and
Average High Average High Average
Priority groups (i.e. visitors, service vehicles, higher rates of infringement notices, requiring
Controls mobility impaired) a certain degree of punitive revenue gathering
Provide information on the location Allows drivers to identify the nearest Management burden placed on Noosa Shire
and availability of parking resources available parking facilities and evaluate Requires passing installation and maintenance
(either real-time or static) the relative value associated with costs to developers
Directional Placed on key access roads to different parking areas
Low Low Low Low Average
signage inform drivers of the locations, Reduces the distance travelled by
availability, and the price associated vehicles looking for a car-park
with the parking facilities Encourages more efficient utilisation of
existing supply
Reduces need for individuals and Lower parking (and associated traffic) In an environment with limited public
business to have access to private requirements transport (as in Noosa), implementation must
vehicles Potential reallocation of parking spaces be led by private companies and Noosa
Potential for collaboration between to more productive purposes Council, as opposed to a market-led solution
businesses / government for private use
Car-share Average Low Average Low Average
organisations for vehicle supply Will require accompanying travel behaviour
efficiencies change programs to assist transition to car-
sharing
Requires an initial momentum / catalyst for
successful uptake
40
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.