Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Attachment F - Carparking Evaluation -Noosa Carparking Study - McGagney report

of 140

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (10.4 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Noosa Council
                                                                                                                                                                                 Noosa Car Parking Study 2017 - 2032
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Final Report


Table 5-1: Parking Demand Management Options
                                                                                                                                                                       Efficiency                Effectiveness
  Parking
                           Key features                              Potential benefits                                 Potential risks                                                        Short-     Long-
  Strategy                                                                                                                                                  Benefits     Costs       Value
                                                                                                                                                                                                term       term
               The implementation of parking             Very effective method of controlling         When implemented in isolation, prices may
                costs priced by length of stay             parking demand                                encourage a shift in clientele to other town
                                                          Encourages higher turnover of parking         centres (and thus may be opposed by local
                                                           spaces                                        business owners). This risk may be mitigated
Priced
                                                          Allows for flexible demand                    by coordinated local and regional                  Average     Average     Average   Average      High
parking
                                                           management                                    implementation of priced parking.
                                                          Charges cost of parking directly to user     May be politically difficult to implement unless
                                                          Priorities for higher priority users          strong existing parking demand justifies it
                                                          Discourages long term visitors
               Time limits on parking to increase        Encourages higher turnover of parking        Stringent parking controls may discourage
Time Limits     turnover, supported by parking             spaces                                        high value visitors
and other       enforcement                               Can be used to target specific user          Results in additional enforcement costs and
                                                                                                                                                            Average      High       Average     High     Average
Priority                                                   groups (i.e. visitors, service vehicles,      higher rates of infringement notices, requiring
Controls                                                   mobility impaired)                            a certain degree of punitive revenue gathering

               Provide information on the location       Allows drivers to identify the nearest       Management burden placed on Noosa Shire
                and availability of parking resources      available parking facilities and evaluate    Requires passing installation and maintenance
                (either real-time or static)               the relative value associated with            costs to developers
Directional    Placed on key access roads to              different parking areas
                                                                                                                                                              Low         Low         Low       Low      Average
signage         inform drivers of the locations,          Reduces the distance travelled by
                availability, and the price associated     vehicles looking for a car-park
                with the parking facilities               Encourages more efficient utilisation of
                                                           existing supply
               Reduces need for individuals and          Lower parking (and associated traffic)       In an environment with limited public
                business to have access to private         requirements                                  transport (as in Noosa), implementation must
                vehicles                                  Potential reallocation of parking spaces      be led by private companies and Noosa
               Potential for collaboration between        to more productive purposes                   Council, as opposed to a market-led solution
                businesses / government                                                                  for private use
Car-share                                                                                                                                                   Average       Low       Average     Low      Average
                organisations for vehicle supply                                                        Will require accompanying travel behaviour
                efficiencies                                                                             change programs to assist transition to car-
                                                                                                         sharing
                                                                                                        Requires an initial momentum / catalyst for
                                                                                                         successful uptake




                                                                                                           40
Log in to download the original file

Attachment F - Carparking Evaluation -Noosa Carparking Study - McGagney report.pdf · 10.4 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.