Original source · versioned page text
2016-01-11 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 12 of 50
10. Pursue options to implement lighting and marker options for boats and beacons to address safety
issues, noting relevant environmental and legal (national and international) parameters which must be
considered
° The concept of illuminated channel markers for improved safety for vessels had been discussed
and it related to The Noosa River becoming a Category 1 river and derelict boats posing a
navigation safety issue.
e The jury thought that even if the state authorities did not act then perhaps Council could develop
lighting for the river that complied with national and international marine laws.
e This came up during discussion of river users and safety for users at night given some vessels
were not lit
e This led to a recommendation that Council consider undertaking this as an initiative
11. Implement stricter management of acceptable commercial uses of river and assume control of
commercial leases/uses on river including all recreational rentals, house boat rentals etc.
° This discussion arose because the jury felt that there should be control of people who had
leases for an “acceptable commercial use” and who were then subletting to other people/
businesses for commercial uses unrelated to the original lease
e The jury thought that there should be clearly defined areas with physical markers to define
physical areas of jetty lease commercial operations. This was to demonstrate where commercial
operations area encroaching on public land, to make it easier to police.
° The jury thought that much stricter of control of where these businesses operate was required.
12. Determine a cap and locations (based on the Noosa River Plan evidence base) for live-a-boards
allowing them to continue as long as they comply with guidelines, permits and operate on a user pays
basis noting that failure to comply to result in lease being terminated.
° The jury thought that many of the current LOBs were not complying with legislation and they
thought that this should be rectified.
° There were jurors who thought that some LOBs contributed to the local economy
° There was discussion about the eyesore nature of the LOBs and that moving them to where
they were less visible and away from busy, prime locations , was a possibility — creation of
specific zones for LOBs.
° The jury were clear that non-compliance with regulations would result in the removal of a permit.
This example may make other LOB owners improve their compliance
Page 12 of 50See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.