Original source · versioned page text
2022-11-08 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 8 NOVEMBER 2022
Page 86 of 89
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 8 NOVEMBER 2022
Studies reveal that around 355,000 tonnes of soil is mobilised into the catchment every year, potentially
depositing a 4.5mm layer of sediment in the bottom of Lake Cootharaba every year.
An overview of past studies on the possible causes of the increase in nutrients and sediments and their
impact downstream in Noosa River between 2008 and 2010 was provided to workshop attendees.
This poses the question as to whether this level of sedimentation input to Lake Cootharaba occurred
before European settlement, and the relationship between increased loads of sediment relate and
significant flooding events.
Discussion:
¢ People perceive water quality is related to turbidity levels.
e NICA proposes a study to quantify sediments entering and leaving Lake Cootharaba including
Particle size, distribution and fluid flow rate.
e NICA is interested in the existence of data on past flow rate measurements in Lake Cootharaba.
8. Coastal ephemeral creeks
KIIKK Project and coastal ephemeral creek monitoring volunteer Paul Ryan provided an overview of
sampling undertaken at 11 sites from 2005 to 2018. The sites included Noosa National Park, Burgess
Creek, Marcus Beach Creek, Castaways Creek, Peregian Creek and Murdering Creek entering Lake
Weyba.
Results:
¢ Results of physical parameters were usually below the guidelines.
e The Coastal Connect Dunes Rehabilitation Project was developed, and the water quality
monitoring program was designed to analyse the effect of the remedial works on nearby water
quality.
e Changes in physical chemical parameters have been encountered but the causes are still
inconclusive. The water monitoring project is ongoing.
e There is a difference in pH measurements above and below the Sewage Treatment Plant in
Burgess Creek, with more acidic pH levels and consistent with other local coastal creeks on areas
reported above the treatment plan.
Discussion:
There is a need for strategic and clear goals to be defined before selecting water parameters and further
sites to be analysed.
9. Mary River Catchment Coordinating Committee
MRCCC Project Officer Brad Wedlock provided an overview of the MRCCC Waterwatch Program which
has been operating over the past 20 years with 106 volunteers across the Mary Catchment, with some
sites in Noosa.
e The program includes baseline data extension, collaboration and partnership, WQOs and
guidelines.
* Noosa Council funded MRCCC to develop a sub-catchment scoring system and report cards
based on the EHMP and WQOs.
e MRCCC has managed three Mary River sites on behalf of DES since 2016 for the Great Barrier
Reef Catchments Loads Program. The parameters measured include sediment, nutrients and
Discussion:
Minutes — Water Quality Workshop 24/08/22 Page 6
Page 86 of 89See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.